
111 segments available
Dave Smith is a comedian, libertarian, political commentator, and the host of Part of the Problem podcast. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep464-sb See below for timestamps, transcript, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. *Transcript:* https://lexfridman.com/dave-smith-transcript *CONTACT LEX:* *Feedback* - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey *AMA* - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama *Hiring* - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring *Other* - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact *EPISODE LINKS:* Dave's X: https://x.com/ComicDaveSmith Dave's YouTube: https://youtube.com/DSmithcomic Dave's Instagram: https://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmith Dave's Website: https://comicdavesmith.com/ Part of the Problem Podcast: https://partoftheproblem.com/ *SPONSORS:* To support this podcast, check out our sponsors & get discounts: *Call of Duty:* First-person shooter video game. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/call_of_duty-ep464-sb *Tax Network USA:* Full-service tax firm. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/tax_network_usa-ep464-sb *Notion:* Note-taking and team collaboration. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/notion-ep464-sb *Shopify:* Sell stuff online. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/shopify-ep464-sb *BetterHelp:* Online therapy and counseling. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/betterhelp-ep464-sb *OUTLINE:* 0:00 - Episode highlight 1:26 - Introduction 1:45 - Libertarianism 3:00 - Ron Paul 6:13 - Military–industrial complex 13:06 - War on Terror 25:25 - China and Taiwan 33:13 - Just war theory 40:22 - Israel and Gaza 57:49 - Douglas Murray 1:05:42 - Hamas 1:22:01 - Hitler and Stalin 1:24:15 - Darryl Cooper 1:33:27 - Antisemitism 1:47:00 - World leaders 1:59:34 - Jeffrey Epstein 2:07:37 - Sam Harris 2:20:21 - Ukraine and Russia 2:39:46 - Joe Rogan 2:52:15 - Conspiracy theories 3:10:06 - Hope *PODCAST LINKS:* - Podcast Website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast - Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr - Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 - RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ - Podcast Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 - Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/lexclips *SOCIAL LINKS:* - X: https://x.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://instagram.com/lexfridman - TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://facebook.com/lexfridman - Patreon: https://patreon.com/lexfridman - Telegram: https://t.me/lexfridman - Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/lexfridman
Dave Smith discusses the ramifications of the Iraq War, emphasizing how the lies that led to the conflict have devastated the country and the economy. He argues that dehumanizing adversaries prevents effective diplomacy and highlights the need for a more humane approach to international relations.
"All the people who sold the war in Iraq they lied us into war after a war. They've bankrupted the country, damn near destroyed the dollar, and like no one loses their job. No one even gets in trouble ..."
In this segment, Smith analyzes Donald Trump's political motivations regarding war, suggesting that Trump is incentivized to end conflicts quickly to maintain his political capital. He critiques the cycle of violence that perpetuates further conflict and advocates for a shift in strategy.
"and then let's see if maybe we could heal. Where are the tapes? Why is everyone talking about the flight logs and the files? Where are the tapes? This guy was clearly taping people to blackmail them. ..."
Dave Smith elaborates on the various branches of libertarianism, including minarchism and anarcho-capitalism. He discusses the influences of key figures like Ron Paul and Milton Friedman, and positions himself within the Rothbardian school of thought, emphasizing the importance of limited government.
"like anything like with left-wing schools of thought or right-wing schools of thought, there's many different camps and different thinkers and so within the kind of broader theme of libertarianism the..."
Smith expresses his deep admiration for Ron Paul, calling him a 'great American hero.' He highlights Paul's integrity, his consistent anti-war stance, and his role as a lone voice in Congress against bipartisan agreements, showcasing the impact of Paul's philosophy on his own beliefs.
"about him? A big fan is an understatement. I think Ron Paul is like the greatest living American hero. Um, I I I revere him on the level of of the founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson or George Washingt..."
In this segment, Smith discusses Ron Paul's central thesis that liberty should be the highest political value. He critiques the inherent force of government and connects it to issues of corruption and military intervention, arguing for a more principled approach to governance.
"he was just kind of alone in the woods being you know they used to call him Dr. No, because well, he was a medical doctor and then he was he would be the lone no vote in Congress like all the time lik..."
Smith reflects on Ron Paul's foresight in calling out corruption in Washington, D.C. He discusses how Paul's message of draining the swamp laid the groundwork for future political movements, including the rise of Donald Trump, and emphasizes the need for accountability in government.
"And he was, you know, you imagine what it must have been like from like the lobbyist perspective when they first tried to go there, you know, and they'd be like, "All right, listen. we really need you..."
Dave Smith shares his perspective on the roots of terrorism, challenging the mainstream narrative that terrorists hate America for its freedoms. He argues that U.S. foreign policy and military actions contribute to anti-American sentiment, providing a nuanced understanding of global conflicts.
"worship or something like that. I do think he's a I think he's a genuinely great man and I think great men are to be revered. Yeah, as you said there's integrity there. Can you speak to the ideas that..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the consequences of U.S. military interventions, highlighting the cycle of violence that ensues. He critiques the lack of accountability for the human cost of war and emphasizes the need for a more compassionate approach to foreign policy.
"so there there's a a lot of components to that, but essentially Ron Paul was talking about draining the swamp way before it was like this dominant mass message. And I think Ron Paul in many ways laid ..."
Smith explores the cultural dimensions of conflict, arguing that many regions resist the imposition of foreign values. He critiques the oversimplified narratives that ignore the complexities of international relations and the historical context of U.S. interventions.
"things for me, okay, at the time. So I was like a I was a young man when I first found Ron Paul. I was I was in uh 2007 was when I first saw him and then started obsessively reading all of his books. ..."
In this poignant segment, Smith reflects on the human cost of war, emphasizing the suffering caused by military actions. He shares a personal perspective on how violence affects families and communities, advocating for empathy in discussions about foreign policy.
"make sense to like what are what is it exactly that like um all the Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush and and even like Milton Friedman and guys like that and Thomas Soul and the it's like you want a c..."
Smith discusses the concept of 'insurgent math,' explaining how military actions can lead to increased recruitment for extremist groups. He critiques the effectiveness of drone strikes and other military strategies, arguing for a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy.
"of get like like I tapped into something that was outside the empire. And I had um I had heard a lot, you know, I was already against George W. Bush and I didn't like the war. I could I I had already ..."
In this segment, Smith addresses the misconceptions surrounding terrorism and the motivations behind it. He argues that understanding the root causes of terrorism is essential for developing effective policies and preventing future conflicts.
"to look at this speedy trial are you kidding me like this is like what is going on here they can own guns and their women can wear miniskirts and that and that just made people so angry that they were..."
Smith emphasizes the importance of empathy in political discourse, particularly regarding military actions. He argues that understanding the perspectives of those affected by war is crucial for creating a more just and peaceful world.
"that could only happen in a history book. That didn't happen to America in the '9s. 2001 was basically the '9s. Um and uh and it was just like, oh, finally it clicked. It was like, that makes sense. i..."
In this closing segment, Smith reflects on the long-term consequences of military interventions, urging listeners to consider the human cost of war. He advocates for a shift in mindset towards diplomacy and understanding rather than violence.
"through the whole piece and there's not one mention of the million people who died in the war. You know, he literally just goes the piece is just measure life under Saddam Hussein verse life under the..."
Dave Smith discusses the instinctual human response to violence and the cycle of retaliation that often follows acts of aggression. He reflects on a past debate regarding the appropriate response to terrorism, emphasizing that the desire to retaliate is a deeply ingrained human trait. This segment explores the motivations behind military actions and the tragic beauty of shared human experiences in conflict.
"this click for me. But it's in a way and I'm not like I'm not a leftist. I'm not an egalitarian. I'm not a cultural relativist. I'm not saying that all cultures are the same or that we all look at the..."
In this segment, Smith examines the influence of the military-industrial complex on global conflicts. He argues that the presence of a profit-driven third party complicates the dynamics between warring factions, making de-escalation difficult. Smith draws parallels between historical conflicts and modern warfare, highlighting how financial interests can perpetuate cycles of violence.
"the real killers are? You think there's a chance that you could come here and and that is like the most human instinct ever? It's like some other tribe just came in here and killed some people in our ..."
Dave Smith critiques the role of mainstream media in shaping public perception and justifying military interventions. He reflects on historical events, such as the Gulf War, and how narratives are constructed to create a sense of urgency for war. This segment delves into the disconnect between public sentiment and the motivations of political leaders, emphasizing the need for critical thinking in the face of media narratives.
"difficult. Yeah. The military-industrial complex in America. It's so big and it's so sophisticated and it's so so it's not just that there's you know um you know there's this there's the intelligence ..."
Smith discusses the concept of just war theory and the moral implications of military intervention. He acknowledges that while there can be justifiable reasons for war, such as self-defense, the loss of innocent lives complicates these justifications. This segment explores the ethical dilemmas faced by nations when considering military action and the importance of weighing consequences.
"think about it because there's for I think for the most part in human history, you would have had to have some type of plausible threat, some type of plausible reality to convince people that we actua..."
In this segment, Smith critiques the American mindset regarding military intervention and empire-building. He argues that the belief in the right to intervene in foreign conflicts reflects a broader imperial mentality. Smith emphasizes the need for humility and self-awareness in international relations, advocating for a focus on domestic issues rather than foreign entanglements.
"'92 really. I mean, they had a little they were in the George HW Bush administration, but after '92, they really weren't. So, they're just writing at these think tanks, and it just didn't seem as, you..."
Dave Smith addresses the complexities surrounding Taiwan and China's one-China policy. He discusses the implications of potential military intervention and the economic dependencies that complicate the situation. This segment highlights the importance of diplomatic relations and the dangers of escalating tensions between superpowers.
"concerned with my marriage. And the idea that like imagine if there were the political will to uh invade Mexico like if DC decided we're taking Mexico City like that's that's going to be part of Ameri..."
Smith emphasizes the need for constructive dialogue and partnerships between the U.S. and China. He critiques the aggressive posturing often seen in U.S. foreign policy and advocates for a more cooperative approach. This segment explores the potential consequences of cold war thinking and the importance of fostering relationships to avoid conflict.
"you don't really know much about the situation. It sounds ridiculous to say but there's something magical about not Taiwan but DSMC. It's incredibly difficult to manage the supply chain and manufactur..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the constraints of reality in international relations, particularly regarding military interventions. He reflects on the limitations faced by the U.S. in addressing conflicts like those in Ukraine and Taiwan. Smith argues for a pragmatic approach to foreign policy that acknowledges the complexities of power dynamics and the need for diplomacy.
"coming in. Um, but there's like even when it's like China, you say China's asserting the one China policy, but the one China policy is the policy of the United States of America and has been for 50 ye..."
Dave Smith concludes with a discussion on the definition of just wars within libertarian theory. He acknowledges that while there are scenarios where military action may be justified, the moral implications of such actions must be carefully considered. This segment emphasizes the importance of accountability and the ethical responsibilities of nations in warfare.
"of in the position is just like you're like hey we'd sure love if you don't do that. You know you can do it and you can get away with it but we would sure love it if you don't. And so the goal would b..."
Dave Smith discusses the moral implications of killing innocent people in extreme scenarios, emphasizing that while there may be extenuating circumstances, the act itself is never justified. He uses a hypothetical situation to illustrate the complexity of moral choices in warfare, stressing the importance of demonstrating necessity in military actions that result in civilian casualties.
"right to kill innocent people there. That's never morally okay. Now there could be a scenario just like this is true in life in general right like there's lots of things that you don't have the right ..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on World War II, discussing the moral complexities of wartime decisions. He argues that even in justifiable military actions, the loss of innocent lives should be mourned and considered a tragedy, highlighting the need for somber reflection rather than celebration of military victories.
"about all these these wars. you know it's not like um you know, I think that like let's just say like if you could make World War II like you could reduce it down to the simplest caricature of what Wo..."
Dave Smith critiques the notion that civilians can be held accountable for the actions of their governments, drawing parallels to the logic used by terrorists. He argues against the justification of targeting civilians, emphasizing that such reasoning is fundamentally flawed and morally indefensible.
"guess essentially I'd say no you don't ever have a right to kill innocent people. It's never self-defense to be killing innocent people. I mean short of like you know some type of scenario where like ..."
Smith discusses the October 7th attack by Hamas, labeling it a horrific act of terrorism. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the broader context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the historical grievances that contribute to such violence, while firmly condemning the targeting of innocent civilians.
"assumption, the axiom of the discussion. Yeah. The the question is, is it is there no other option than doing it this way? It's like, okay, like October 7th happened. We can all agree this was like a ..."
In this segment, Smith critiques Benjamin Netanyahu's long tenure as Prime Minister and his policies towards Palestinians. He argues that Netanyahu's approach has led to increased violence and suffering, and discusses the implications of the ongoing blockade of Gaza, calling for a reevaluation of Israel's responsibilities towards the Palestinian people.
"Obama. But Osama bin Laden very explicitly said when he was asked like "Well, are you just going to target like US military sites or are you targeting US civilians?" It was an interview in the '9s bef..."
Dave Smith addresses the complexities of humanitarian aid in Gaza, arguing for the need to allow reputable international organizations to provide assistance. He critiques the current blockade and the implications of funding Hamas, advocating for a more humane approach to aid that prioritizes the welfare of the Palestinian people.
"destroyed the legacy of Benjamin Netanyahu. Um who is you know I I mean this isn't like George W. Bush you know was I mean he was on the job for almost a year when 9/11 happened but it was still kind ..."
Smith discusses the historical context of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, emphasizing the need for a resolution that respects Palestinian rights. He draws parallels to historical injustices, arguing that the status quo is indefensible and calling for a reevaluation of the power dynamics in the region.
"liberal Jewish community in Israel wouldn't be able to put pressure on them to make a deal. But what are the options? So, if he doesn't allow the money in, it also looks really bad for him because if ..."
In this segment, Smith explores potential pathways for Palestinian self-determination and flourishing. He emphasizes the importance of building infrastructure, democratic processes, and normalization of relations with Israel as essential steps towards a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
"And much like in the same way that like if you kidnap someone and you lock them in your basement and you don't feed them, you murdered that person. So in other words uh um stated differently, you're n..."
Smith highlights the necessity of empathy in understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He discusses the emotional impact of violence on both sides and the importance of recognizing the humanity of all individuals affected by the ongoing strife.
"defending uh Arab terrorism. It's uh I think it's really it's it's a tragedy that the Arabs embraced terrorism. Uh I don't think it's unique to them. And in fact, you know, I think it was the um the Z..."
In this concluding segment, Smith expresses a hopeful outlook for the future of Israeli-Palestinian relations. He discusses the potential for peace through dialogue and cooperation, drawing on historical examples of reconciliation between nations.
"rights, being ruled by a government that they do not get to vote uh for or against. Um, no right to do commerce with the outside world, no freedom of travel, no freedom of movement, no basic property ..."
Dave Smith discusses the potential for a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, drawing parallels to Egypt's land for peace deal. He emphasizes the need for Israel to reconsider its stance and the importance of addressing the Palestinian situation, while acknowledging the fears and complexities involved in such a shift.
"been to war since you know and like I do at least try to hold out that like that is you know it's not like Egypt is you're not going to say they don't have an issue with radical Islam in Egypt you kno..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on the historical context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, referencing Thomas Jefferson's quote about slavery. He argues that while there are legitimate concerns about security, the moral imperative to end oppression must prevail, and he expresses hope for a future resolution.
"also remember in the hopeful message you send like at any day you can make a deal. That's one of the frustrating things I had with I hosted a debate on Israel. It's like it just felt hopeless and a lo..."
Dave Smith explores the idea of Saudi Arabia playing a mediating role in the Israel-Palestine conflict. He suggests that normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia could lead to a more stable situation in Gaza, highlighting the need for cooperation among regional powers.
"Egypt like if the Israelis they're almost like look these are American sock puppets you know for the most part right and So their their thing is that like okay 100% of my population is completely oppo..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the complexities surrounding Hamas, describing it as a fanatical organization that has not prioritized the welfare of its people. He examines the implications of Hamas's actions on the peace process and the perception of the Palestinian struggle.
"of their land. And that the whole um a land for people for a people without land was never true. That was just a slogan that made that felt good to avoid what you guys actually did. and the fact that ..."
Smith reflects on the disturbing celebrations in Gaza following violent events, comparing them to the reactions in the U.S. after 9/11. He emphasizes the need for understanding the context of suffering and the psychological impact of prolonged conflict on the Palestinian people.
"no question that they have pursued they have they have pursued a path that was just devastating to their own people and there's no question they have not spent the resources they have on their priorit..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the cyclical nature of violence in the Israel-Palestine conflict, arguing that military actions often exacerbate the situation. He advocates for a change in approach to break the cycle and foster a path toward peace.
"mission accomplished banners and flying on jet. I mean, I think all of the I think having Bob Hope specials at the end of the Persian Gulf War was sickening. I just think all of it is like horrific. U..."
Smith critiques the notion of Israel as a democracy while millions of Palestinians live under occupation without voting rights. He argues that true democracy cannot exist under such conditions and calls for a reevaluation of the situation.
"for the prospects of peace. Well, I'd say I get your point. I guess it's an interesting question that I I don't know if any of us know exactly the answer to but I would say that like um you know even ..."
In this segment, Smith contrasts the ethical implications of violence perpetrated by Hamas and the Israeli government. He discusses the moral responsibilities of both sides and the need for a more humane approach to conflict resolution.
"there's an aggressive military campaign support for Hamas goes back up. So, I just think that like I'm more hopeful than not that like you could get to a place where like but it it requires like you y..."
Smith elaborates on the realities of occupation, arguing that the long-standing control over Palestinian territories undermines the claim of democracy in Israel. He emphasizes the need for recognition of Palestinian rights and the historical injustices that have shaped the current landscape.
"his words were, "The Zionist Project always knew it was going to involve transfer." That was Benny Morris's words. Now, when when Finkelestein was grilling him on this on your podcast, he kind of said..."
In the concluding segment, Smith calls for a fundamental change in how the Israel-Palestine conflict is approached. He stresses the importance of acknowledging past wrongs and working towards a future where both Israelis and Palestinians can coexist peacefully.
"have voting rights. And I just by any other like reasonable commonly held standard of democracy, we would not call that a democracy. I mean, like, I'm not again, I'm not even saying this to try to be ..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the moral complexities of warfare, particularly regarding civilian casualties. He compares the actions of governments in war to those of individuals in murder cases, arguing that intent matters and that repeated civilian deaths in military operations cannot be dismissed as mere collateral damage.
"mean look they kill people in a more primitive barbaric way I guess you could say you know there's something a little bit cleaner about like you know when it's done by a government um and it's collate..."
Smith elaborates on the ethical considerations of war, asserting that the value of civilian lives should be paramount. He critiques the justification of military actions that result in civilian deaths, drawing parallels to domestic crime and emphasizing the need for accountability in warfare.
"bad guy and I want to kill you and you're at home with a a bunch of women and children and I know there's women and children there. Like I know for a fact that if I blow up this building it's going to..."
This segment addresses the inherent immorality of war, with Smith arguing that the loss of innocent lives is a constant in conflict. He reflects on the complexities of justifying wars, including World War II, and the challenges of discussing ethics in the context of military actions.
"pretty much and then also when you mix in with that the fact that like you know I mean if you go and I'm not taking an opinion on the word genocide. I don't even like to get into that conversation. I ..."
Smith discusses the historical context of World War II and the role of leaders like Churchill and Stalin. He critiques the narratives surrounding these figures and the implications of their decisions on the course of history, highlighting the need for a nuanced understanding of leadership in wartime.
"know, when when Tucker was on um Pierce Morgan, he said the thing he goes, you know, I don't like my tax dollars being used to intentionally kill children. And a lot of people really objected to that ..."
In this segment, Smith tackles the controversial topic of human shields in warfare. He argues that the use of civilians as shields complicates moral judgments and emphasizes the responsibility of governments to avoid civilian casualties, regardless of the tactics employed by their adversaries.
"the surface level states that the value of every life of every civilian life is equal and high in value. That's a good society. That's the concern with extremist ideology that uh that basically is ver..."
Smith reflects on the complexities of discussing war ethics, asserting that while military actions are often justified, the reality of civilian deaths must be acknowledged. He emphasizes the need for a moral framework that transcends national boundaries and addresses the fundamental wrongness of war.
"here. And then just to go one step further, I think particularly like part of the reasons why people have different attitudes about the way two nations fight like what what we think of as war versus w..."
This segment explores the nature of warfare and its impact on civilians. Smith argues that the distinction between military and civilian targets is often blurred, leading to tragic consequences. He calls for a reevaluation of how wars are conducted and the ethical implications of military strategies.
"not the situation here, you know? So like while Israel is saying, hey they're using human shields, it's also like, and that is true, I think, to some degree. I think the Israelis overplay it a little ..."
Smith discusses the historical narratives surrounding World War II and the implications of these narratives on contemporary discussions about war. He critiques the oversimplification of complex historical events and the need for a more nuanced understanding of the motivations and actions of leaders during wartime.
"like third rails of American politics that if you like if if you have any type of view that is not the the approved authorized view of how these events went, you're in a lot of trouble. If you wanted ..."
In this segment, Smith addresses the work of Daryl Cooper and the controversies surrounding his views on historical events. He emphasizes the importance of responsible storytelling in history and critiques the tendency to oversimplify complex narratives, particularly regarding World War II.
"scientifically figured it out. Since you mentioned Daryl Cooper, you're friends with him. Can you tell me about him and tell me about the whole saga about where he got attacked after the the talker in..."
Smith concludes with a discussion on the importance of truth in historical narratives. He argues that understanding the complexities of history is crucial for informed discussions about current events and emphasizes the need for honesty in recounting past atrocities and leadership decisions.
"conflict or the history of this. He is has like the utmost responsibility in the way that he tells the story and the way he presents it. I cannot understand how anyone would listen to his work and com..."
Dave Smith critiques the portrayal of historical figures like Churchill and the oversimplification of World War II narratives. He argues against the idea that appeasement is always wrong and emphasizes the complexity of historical events, suggesting that the lessons drawn from history should not justify modern aggression against civilians.
"if that's what you are coming into it for. Okay. One thing I want to say is I think calling Daryl Nazi Nazi sympathizer is just wrong and it it does a lot of damage. I think he's he has a lot of value..."
Smith discusses how the narrative of World War II is often weaponized in contemporary debates, particularly regarding Israel and Hamas. He highlights the dangers of trivializing historical events and warns against drawing direct comparisons between historical and modern conflicts, emphasizing the importance of understanding the context and power dynamics involved.
"go to total war against a civilian population because this one time it was necessary. Like it's and and the idea that Bobby Kennedy said this to me again, somebody who I I really do love and uh admire..."
In this segment, Smith addresses the increase in antisemitic sentiments on social media platforms. He explores the challenges of distinguishing between genuine hate and trolling, and how outrage culture complicates the discourse around antisemitism, ultimately leading to a dilution of the term's meaning.
"was arguing with one guy on a podcast uh and he said that he goes, "You can't allow dictators to have nuclear weapons cuz they might use them." And I was like, "But but we are the only ones who ever u..."
Smith reflects on the effects of woke culture on young white men in America, discussing how identity politics have created a backlash. He argues that the current cultural climate has led to a rise in resentment and a reactionary stance among those who feel marginalized by progressive narratives.
"Um then there's also it's like there's so many weird dynamics because there's no question like I see it all the time. I mean I see a level of like Jew hatred on Twitter that I've never seen before in ..."
Smith examines the influence of Israel in American foreign policy and military actions. He discusses the historical context of U.S. involvement in wars and how Israel's actions are often intertwined with American military strategies, raising questions about the implications for Jewish communities worldwide.
"too. Um but then also you're like you don't see that this is going to result in something bad. So there's there's that. Um, but I mean I you know clearly and and what's weird to me is that I I guess i..."
In this segment, Smith shares his personal experiences with criticism of Israel and the backlash he faces as a Jewish individual. He discusses the complexities of Jewish identity in the context of global politics and the challenges of navigating discussions around Israel without being labeled as self-hating.
"by fourstar general Wesley Clark. He literally said it was a study paid for by the Israelis that we were going to topple seven countries in 5 years and we didn't get there in 5 years but we've been ma..."
Smith analyzes the conflicting narratives surrounding the Israel-Palestine issue, highlighting how extreme voices on both sides can undermine constructive dialogue. He emphasizes the need for nuanced discussions that recognize the complexities of the situation rather than resorting to inflammatory rhetoric.
"people get hysterical about it. In a way that's completely not productive. But to me, I think I think of the Jewhating uh nerds and trolls on Twitter as just the other side of the woke. I kind of get ..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on his past interview with Benjamin Netanyahu and expresses his desire for a longer, more in-depth conversation. He shares his hesitations about interviewing world leaders like Vladimir Putin, citing the pressure from polarized audiences and the complexities of discussing sensitive topics. Smith contemplates the balance between critical questioning and allowing leaders to express themselves authentically.
"then with the um with the the Jewing post, too, it's just Yeah. It's it just feeds right into the the opposition side of how to caricature, you know? It's like, oh, so their game is they'll smear ever..."
Dave Smith shares his thoughts on the psychological toll of engaging with online criticism and the expectations that come with being a public figure. He discusses the importance of maintaining focus on his career and family while navigating the challenges posed by vocal critics. Smith reflects on the necessity of accepting the consequences of public life, including the scrutiny and backlash that often accompany it.
"because the reason I'm leaning against doing it is because the very people you're talking about cuz I just don't want them to on either side, pro- Israel, pro, it doesn't really matter. But the chanti..."
In this segment, Smith expresses his passion for engaging in debates and the adrenaline rush that comes with it. He discusses the obligation he feels to challenge himself and defend his views in public forums. Smith acknowledges the risks involved in debates, including the potential for public humiliation, but emphasizes the importance of rigorous argumentation and the thrill of intellectual confrontation.
"of this. Like it's just and I just like I just kind of made a decision at a certain point that it's like I'm just going to accept that that's the price of business here. That's what it costs and then ..."
Smith elaborates on the unique challenges of interviewing world leaders compared to other guests. He highlights the need for a different approach to elicit genuine responses from powerful figures like Netanyahu. Smith discusses the barriers these leaders face and the importance of creating a comfortable environment for open dialogue, while also recognizing the weight of the topics at hand.
"price. And so I just from my perspective I'm like, "Yeah, but how could you turn down getting three hours with Netanyahu?" Like that would just be so interesting. And I'm not even saying you know, lik..."
In this reflective segment, Smith contemplates the expectations placed on public figures and the psychological impact of criticism. He discusses the balance between personal ambition and the fear of failure in public debates. Smith emphasizes the importance of being prepared and the responsibility that comes with engaging in high-stakes discussions.
"be super supportive of Netanyahu is super critical in a way that you can't do in front of the guy. Yeah, you can't you you have there's a if you want to reveal something about that person there's a di..."
Smith and Fridman discuss the philosophical implications of life’s finite nature. They explore the idea that scarcity can enhance the value of life experiences and ideas. Smith argues that the inevitability of death fosters creativity and the evolution of thought, suggesting that new ideas often emerge from generational shifts.
"probably all had things like certain type of ventures in life where you're like, all right, no, I don't want to do that. But then you have to have a moment and be like, why is it you don't want to? Oh..."
In this segment, Smith shares his skepticism about transhumanism and the pursuit of eternal life. He discusses the potential dangers of overextending human life and the importance of maintaining a natural balance. Smith emphasizes the value of a finite lifespan in fostering meaningful experiences and societal progress.
"like have a conversation to talk to the guy. Probably try to get some important questions in, but also give him a chance to breathe and be a person. Um, I just from my perspective, but again, it's a v..."
Dave Smith discusses the mysterious career trajectory of Jeffrey Epstein, questioning how someone with no apparent experience could rise to immense wealth and power so quickly. He highlights the connections to intelligence agencies and the implications of Epstein's relationships with powerful figures, suggesting a deeper level of corruption and evil at play.
"rogue elements within those organizations like this is not necessarily coming from the director or or what you know I I don't know but you look at the guy the way his his career trajectory tracks is l..."
In this segment, Smith delves into the shocking revelations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's alleged pedophile ring, implicating high-profile individuals and discussing the systemic cover-up. He emphasizes the moral outrage at the lack of accountability and the complicity of institutions that failed to act against such heinous crimes.
"And then you're just in you're just inserted into this world with all of the most like highest level political leaders and cultural figures and stuff. But the thing that's amazing about the Jeffrey Eb..."
Dave Smith critiques the media's role in suppressing the Epstein story, highlighting the failure of journalists to expose the truth despite having evidence of a child trafficking ring. He questions the ethics of those who chose to remain silent and the implications of such decisions on public trust in media institutions.
"I mean like the there's a blackmail operation that relies on raping American children and and like if this is uh you know whether it's CIA or MSAD doesn't make one less you know it's equally horrible ..."
Smith raises critical questions about the missing evidence in the Epstein case, particularly the tapes that could implicate powerful figures. He discusses the legal complexities surrounding such evidence and expresses skepticism about whether the truth will ever be fully uncovered, reflecting on the broader implications for society.
"news network and you uncovered a child raping ring that implicated the most powerful people in our society and your news network told you we will not run this story because of our relationship with th..."
In this segment, Smith examines the suspicious circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody, questioning the narrative presented by authorities. He discusses the implications of such events on public perception and the overarching themes of corruption and accountability in the justice system.
"don't know what the legal process of this is, but like cuz I think technically it's child porn, so like Yeah. Okay. you can't just like distribute it out and let everybody watch it. But isn't there a ..."
Dave Smith reflects on the importance of trust in institutions, particularly in light of the Epstein scandal. He critiques the notion that we should blindly trust these institutions when they have failed to protect the most vulnerable, arguing for greater transparency and accountability to restore public faith.
"And I I mean, even the the fact that even the Trump administration when Pam Bondi goes, "We're going to release all of this information. We've only redacted what needs to be redacted for national secu..."
Smith speculates on the potential involvement of intelligence agencies in the Epstein case, discussing how such connections could explain the lack of accountability. He emphasizes the need for a critical examination of the relationships between powerful individuals and government entities.
"actually. I believe in institutions like I I think they have val so this is where you and I probably disagree on the libertarian side I think it's I think institutions if they're run efficiently can r..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the changing landscape of media and how it affects political engagement. He highlights the shift from traditional media to podcasts and social media as platforms for political discourse, emphasizing the importance of reaching audiences directly.
"way, the MSAD thing is a new thing. It used to be uh FSB and CIA. Uh what do I want to say about that? Oh yeah. I've uh been gradually growing in popularity over the past 10 years. I've been doing uh ..."
Dave Smith shares his experiences engaging with world leaders, emphasizing the value of direct dialogue in understanding their perspectives. He critiques the mainstream media's portrayal of these figures and advocates for more open conversations to foster better understanding.
"they're like they're they're human beings. And I think a lot of them as human beings are exhausted by journalists by shitty journalists I should say that and it's hard for them to know which is the go..."
Smith discusses the importance of diplomacy over military intervention in resolving global conflicts, using examples from recent wars. He argues for a more nuanced understanding of international relations, advocating for solutions that prioritize dialogue and negotiation over aggression.
"though it's a but whatever these these shows on the internet have the audience and so that's a big factor just that it's like oh this is where you can go to the audience and then I would say and I don..."
Smith contrasts Donald Trump's approach to the Ukraine conflict with that of Joe Biden, suggesting that Trump's desire for peace is more genuine. He critiques the idea of security guarantees and the implications of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts.
"solution here. And so there's just like a lot and and the problem is when you don't like if you make everybody monsters and they're not human beings, well, you can't do diplomacy with monsters. You ca..."
Dave Smith argues that Vladimir Putin has shown a willingness to negotiate throughout the Ukraine conflict. He references NATO's refusal to consider Putin's proposals and the potential consequences of ignoring diplomatic avenues.
"puts Donald Trump and and I don't think everything he's done has been perfect um and I really did not like that mineral uh deal that he was floating out for a while there and I I think maybe that migh..."
Smith asserts that while Putin initiated the war in Ukraine, the West's actions, particularly NATO expansion, contributed to the conflict. He emphasizes the need for accountability and understanding the complexities of international relations.
"fought. And also like there's simply we're in this weird position where America postures like they're so tough but really when it comes down to it we're not going to war in Ukraine. There's no politic..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the historical context of NATO expansion and its implications for U.S.-Russia relations. He highlights George Kennan's warnings about the dangers of expanding NATO after the Cold War.
"throughout the war. And there's been a lot of solid reporting on this. And I mean the sources on it are pretty impeccable. The the head of NATO Stlenberg, I always mess up his name but he literally sa..."
Smith expresses hope for a swift resolution to the Ukraine conflict, suggesting that Trump's urgency for peace could lead to a quicker end to the war. He reflects on the human cost of prolonged conflict and the need for decisive action.
"So, I do think I think uh also the Joe Biden's CIA director who was a CI CIA director's whole four years uh uh William Burns uh when he was ambassador to Russia, he wrote the net means net and in the ..."
Dave Smith analyzes Ukrainian President Zelensky's evolving stance on the war, noting a shift from a hardline approach to a more pragmatic view that includes seeking security guarantees. He discusses the implications of this change for peace negotiations.
"he did it seemed like he I'm not defending the decision. I'm just saying it seemed like he reluctantly uh debate, you know, what was it in 2014 or 15 when they had the plebites in Crimea and in the Do..."
Smith reflects on the unique nature of the Ukraine conflict, emphasizing the reality of neighboring countries at war. He contrasts this with America's historical military engagements and the complexities of fighting on home soil.
"bit of an entitlement to demanding a security guarantee. Like what exactly do you mean from America? What that'll go to war if you're invaded? Why are why do we owe that to anybody? Like that's crazy...."
In this segment, Smith discusses the moral implications of war, questioning the justification for violence and the responsibility of leaders. He draws parallels between personal conflicts and international relations to highlight the need for accountability.
"who's at fault. Oh, I I agree. I'll say one standard, like one standard for everybody. The standard that I laid out before is the same one I said. It's did you absolutely have to do that? you know, on..."
Smith critiques U.S. foreign policy decisions over the decades, linking them to the current conflict in Ukraine. He argues that past administrations have contributed to the escalation of tensions with Russia through reckless policies.
"it may be wrong. Um, but if China or Russia ever like backed a street push to overthrow the democratically elected government in Mexico and then install a pro-Chinese or a pro-Russian government and t..."
Dave Smith delves into Putin's perspective on security threats posed by NATO and the historical context of Russia's military actions. He emphasizes the need to understand these motivations to address the conflict effectively.
"all, we're in a post-nuclear world right? So, meaning post there's nuclear weapons. So, the threat of somebody being on your border is just not the same kind of threat when you're a nuclear power, whi..."
Smith highlights the devastating human toll of the Ukraine conflict, stressing the importance of recognizing the consequences of war. He calls for a reevaluation of strategies to prevent further loss of life.
"should make very clear because the way that comes across the full responsibility of the invasion of Ukraine lays at the hands of Vladimir Putin. Sure. I completely agree with that. Vladimir Putin is u..."
In this concluding segment, Smith speculates on the future of U.S.-Russia relations and the potential for peace. He emphasizes the need for diplomatic engagement and understanding to avoid further escalation.
"that. That being said, you can also point out that the, you know, really what we're talking about here is the George HW Bush administration, the Clintons, Bush again, Obama, and then Trump. And the pe..."
Dave Smith discusses the intense reality of war when it occurs on neighboring countries' borders, contrasting it with America's historical distance from conflict. He emphasizes the psychological impact of living in a war zone, particularly for those in Ukraine and Russia, who have experienced significant trauma throughout the 20th century. This segment highlights the unique challenges faced by nations engaged in direct conflict and the deep-rooted historical traumas that shape their current realities.
"uh with whoever the future president is. You'll be the only guy who's interviewed both of them, I think. Yeah. During this war, right? And I have to say the border crossing is getting increasingly mor..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on the historical traumas experienced by both Russia and Ukraine, including famines and invasions that have shaped their national identities. He points out that Americans may struggle to comprehend the depth of this trauma, which adds complexity to the current conflict. This discussion sheds light on how past experiences influence present-day perceptions and reactions to war, emphasizing the emotional weight carried by these nations.
"as we've found out over the years there's still a lot of challenges to that. Even when your side has night vision goggles and the other one doesn't, and your side can call in air strikes and the other..."
Dave Smith shares insights from his podcasting journey, highlighting the unique relationship he builds with his audience. He discusses how podcasting allows for deeper connections than traditional media formats, fostering a sense of familiarity and friendship between hosts and listeners. This segment explores the evolving nature of audience engagement in the digital age and the authenticity required to maintain trust in these relationships.
"Plus a history in both nations of super sophisticated and expansive intelligence agencies. Right. Right. Right. Yeah that's a very good point. Yeah. You host a podcast called Part of the Problem. Yes...."
Smith and Fridman delve into the concept of how many hours of content consumption it takes to form a genuine connection with a podcast host. They discuss the shift from brief television appearances to long-form conversations that allow audiences to truly understand personalities. This segment emphasizes the importance of authenticity and vulnerability in building rapport with listeners, suggesting that deeper connections can be formed through extended engagement.
"then at the same time, right, like even though we just kind of met that one time and then we talked on the phone and now we're doing the show. I kind I know you already like I already know you and it'..."
In this segment, Smith expresses his admiration for Joe Rogan, discussing how Rogan's podcast has transformed the landscape of media and comedy. He highlights Rogan's genuine curiosity and fearlessness in addressing controversial topics, which has allowed for open discussions that challenge mainstream narratives. This segment reflects on the impact of Rogan's platform in providing a space for diverse perspectives and the importance of authenticity in media.
"to 50 hour range is when you're like okay it's kind of interesting in a way right because like the the thing before like the Joe Rogan experience and was like kind of the thing that made comedians big..."
Smith discusses the challenges of engaging in controversial conversations, particularly in the current political climate. He reflects on how Rogan's willingness to explore sensitive topics has been both groundbreaking and risky. This segment emphasizes the importance of having open dialogues about contentious issues and the role of media figures in facilitating these discussions, highlighting the need for courage in the face of societal pressures.
"you see into your their soul, you'll notice that and you know that about them. Like this is a guarded person. This this was ultimately Camala Harris's issue, right? And this is why she was probably, y..."
Dave Smith shares his gratitude for Joe Rogan's mentorship and support throughout his career. He recounts how Rogan provided him with opportunities that significantly impacted his life and career trajectory. This segment underscores the importance of mentorship in the entertainment industry and the positive influence of supportive figures who help emerging talents navigate their paths.
"like that. So like I always really admired him and I was always a huge fan of his. And then he literally not only did he like change my life, but he changed like all of my friends lives. Like it's lik..."
Smith praises Joe Rogan's fearlessness and genuine curiosity, noting how these traits inspire him. He discusses Rogan's ability to engage with a wide range of topics without fear of backlash, which sets him apart from traditional journalists. This segment highlights the value of authenticity and courage in media, encouraging others to embrace their curiosity and engage in meaningful conversations.
"just he is like and I try not to abuse this but there's been like a few points like over the years where I was like I really need advice on this and I've gone and he's been like the absolute best at l..."
In this segment, Smith critiques the approach of some conspiracy theorists who present their conclusions with certainty without sufficient evidence. He emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and careful analysis when discussing controversial topics. This discussion serves as a reminder of the need for rigor and skepticism in evaluating claims, particularly in the realm of conspiracy theories, and the potential pitfalls of jumping to conclusions.
"not he legitimately didn't give a fuck if like he talks to any of the presidential candidates or not, if he he'll just talk to friends like just cuz he wants to. And there's no like clickbaitiness to ..."
In this segment, Smith addresses popular conspiracy theories, particularly the claim that Israel was involved in the 9/11 attacks. He urges listeners to scrutinize the evidence presented and highlights the psychological biases that can lead to flawed conclusions in conspiracy thinking.
"there's just a lot of things like that. There's a lot of things I even see like because it's a very popular conspiracy theory online now that um that Israel did 9/11. And I'm like, uh, I'm open. You k..."
Dave Smith critiques the tendency of some conspiracy theorists to overlook critical analysis in favor of sensational narratives. He emphasizes the need for rigorous examination of claims and the dangers of confirmation bias in shaping beliefs about historical events.
"the case is. I mean, there's several psychological effects. I think there's a certain drug to the dogmatic certainty that you were mentioning. It, you know it really annoys me that there's something a..."
Smith reflects on the lack of accountability for leaders who misled the public into wars, particularly regarding Iraq. He discusses the erosion of trust in institutions and the implications of leaders facing no repercussions for catastrophic decisions.
"certain about this. It's at least debatable. And you know, so you always try and then the thing like I I feel like at least for me is which I try to do. I'm sure I fail at at this a ton but you try to..."
In this segment, Dave Smith expresses hope for a more transparent and authentic political landscape. He discusses the potential for new leadership that resonates with the public's desire for genuine representation and the importance of long-form discussions in politics.
"American people just wouldn't put up with it anymore. And this is why trust in every institution and the corporate media and the Congress and all of it has evaporated is that it's like he's just sayin..."
Smith shares insights from economist Jean Ebstein on radical optimism, using historical examples like the abolition of slavery and the fall of the Soviet Union to illustrate how significant societal changes can occur unexpectedly. He encourages a hopeful perspective on current political dynamics.
"transparency, more like authenticity. I think also the Democratic party has learned the lesson of like you have to have candidates that do I I don't give a shit about podcast, but do podcast like thin..."
Dave Smith discusses the changing standards for political candidates, emphasizing the importance of authenticity and the ability to engage in long-form discussions. He contrasts current expectations with past political practices, highlighting the benefits of transparency in leadership.
"you're going to have to do a long form show where people you really have to have, you know, and and that that I think is long-term a real positive development, you know, like you you just kind of know..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on the significance of authenticity in political candidates, citing figures like John Stewart as examples of genuine voices in a sea of phoniness. He argues that true authenticity can resonate with voters and foster trust in leadership.
"makes you actually a better person. I I ultimately think that Barack Obama was a fascinating human being. And there was a choice made early on to be more to do like less interviews, be more behind the..."
Smith speculates on the possibility of a transformative figure emerging in the Democratic Party, drawing parallels to Donald Trump's rise in the Republican Party. He discusses the need for a candidate who can authentically connect with the electorate and challenge the status quo.
"They're a mess like I've never seen a political party before. But that in itself is is I think a very good thing. And what comes from here is there's a lot of possibilities now. And you know there's n..."
Dave Smith emphasizes the importance of courage in political discourse, highlighting the need for leaders to express their beliefs authentically. He discusses the challenges faced by those who dare to speak out against prevailing narratives and the value of honest dialogue in politics.
"to the Democrats. But the thing is, it would have to be somebody outside of the three-letter agency control cuz that's what everyone's rejecting right now. But if you were to actually sit there and go..."
Dave Smith shares a powerful perspective on radical optimism, drawing parallels between historical events like the abolition of slavery and the fall of the Soviet Union. He emphasizes how societal changes that once seemed impossible can occur rapidly, urging listeners to maintain hope in the face of current challenges.
"and he told me this once and I just always loved it and he so I call it Ebstein's Ebstein's case not that Eb different Ebstein Jean Ebstein no relation I want to be clear on that okay this is Jean's l..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on the changing dynamics of information control in society. He discusses his past fears during the COVID-19 pandemic about censorship and the suppression of alternative voices, contrasting it with the current landscape where diverse opinions can flourish, highlighting the loss of monopoly on propaganda.
"neocons because when he was trying to have daunt with Russia the neocons were in the press being like he just guaranteed another hundred years of Soviet dominance you know and if someone had just been..."
Dave Smith critiques the media's role in shaping public opinion, particularly during the lead-up to the Iraq War. He argues that the current media environment, with influential figures like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson, prevents a unified narrative from dominating, showcasing the importance of diverse voices in public discourse.
"remember so vividly 2002 and and 2002 now you know 911 happened in late 200 1. We invaded Iraq in 2003, but all of 2002 was a massive propaganda campaign just constantly laying down the blueprints for..."
Smith expresses optimism about the future, particularly in technological advancements and medical innovations. He shares a personal story about his son's successful heart surgery, illustrating how modern medicine has transformed lives and emphasizing the miracles of progress that many take for granted.
"a place now where we have this world of possibilities that that would have seemed impossible just so recently. And so just thinking like all of that rambling stew, whatever all that was that leaves me..."