
52 segments available
My guest today is Scott Aaronson, a theoretical computer scientist, OG blogger, and quantum computing maestro. Scott has so many achievements and credentials that listing them here would take longer than recording the episode! Here's a select few: - Self-taught programmer at age 11, Cornell computer science student at 15, PhD recipient by 22! - Schlumberger Centennial Chair of Computer Science at The University of Texas at Austin. - Director of UT Austin's Quantum Information Center. - Former visiting researcher on OpenAI's alignment team (2022-2024). - Awarded the ACM prize in computing in 2020 and the Tomassoni-Chisesi Prize in Physics (under 40 category) in 2018. … you get the point. Scott and I dig into the misunderstood world of quantum computing — the hopes, the hindrances, and the hucksters — to unpack what a quantum-empowered future could really look like. We also discuss what makes humans special in the age of AI, the stubbornly persistent errors of the seat-to-keyboard interface, and MUCH more. I hope you enjoy the conversation as much as I did. For the full transcript, some highlights from Scott’s blog, and bucketloads of other goodies designed to make you go, “Hmm, that’s interesting!” check out our Substack - https://newsletter.osv.llc/. Important Links: - Shtetl-Optimized - https://scottaaronson.blog (Scott’s blog) - My Reading Burden - https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=8217 - On blankfaces - https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=8217 Show Notes: 0:00:00 Intro 0:00:38 Main podcast 0:01:52 So much reading. So little time. 0:07:26 The problem of human specialness in the age of AI 0:23:00 It’s always the same quantum weirdness 0:26:39 Why it’s easy to be a quantum huckster 0:31:06 Quantum progress, quantum hopes, and quantum limits 0:41:04 Encryption in a post-quantum world 0:52:12 Wielding the hammer of interference 1:01:50 Scientific discovery in a quantum empowered world 1:13:33 Bureaucracy and blank faces 1:16:03 Scott as Emperor of the World Books Mentioned: - The Fifth Science; by Exurb1a - The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy; by Douglas Adams
Scott Aaronson discusses the challenges of discerning genuine advancements in quantum computing from the hype. He highlights how the involvement of money leads to misinformation, with companies making bold claims about quantum capabilities without substantiating them with scientific rigor.
"for even an intelligent Layman trying to disambiguate what is the real deal verse the hype is virtually impossible once there is money involved then there are husters they can just put out a press rel..."
In this segment, Jim O'Shaughnessy introduces Scott Aaronson, a prominent theoretical computer scientist and award-winning academic. Scott shares a memorable moment regarding an undergraduate teaching award that left a lasting impression on him, showcasing his passion for education.
"well did you get an improvement over a classical [Music] computer well hello everyone it's Jim o shanesy with another infinite Loops I must tell you that today's guest really dogs me uh my guest is Sc..."
Scott Aaronson reflects on the overwhelming amount of reading required to stay updated in his field. He discusses the balance between consuming information and producing original work, emphasizing the challenge of managing time effectively amidst a flood of new research and inquiries from students.
"know gave you that little chill feeling I think that that that that would have to be like a undergraduate teaching award that I got when when I was at what a what a great answer that I I love that ans..."
Jim shares his insights on observing children and their unfiltered curiosity. He believes that watching kids can teach adults about human nature and the importance of exploration, contrasting this with the pressures of adult life and the need to stay informed.
"because I think we kind of are animated by the same thing which is we are so lucky to be alive at this point in the timeline and and like to to not read about everything that's going on seems to me to..."
Scott discusses the impact of parenthood on his productivity and how he navigates teaching complex concepts to his children. He expresses the joy of sharing knowledge about topics like quantum computing while acknowledging the distractions that come with family life.
"basically a full-time job in itself right and so then and then and then that that's incredibly dangerous because I can feel like okay I I am you know I'm I'm I'm making progress on something that seem..."
Scott introduces his thoughts on the concept of human specialness in relation to AI. He argues that our perceived weaknesses, such as mortality and unpredictability, may actually become strengths in a world increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence.
"specific to me you know all the the emails that I get from you know because of my blog for example from you know random people around the world and you know and like if there's some student who has qu..."
In this segment, Scott challenges the notion that humans are fundamentally different from computers. He emphasizes the need to articulate what makes us unique, questioning the relevance of evolutionary history in defining our consciousness compared to AI.
"they take over my life and but you know it seems like if I want to you know continue to do original things and you know maybe I've got you know a few more decades you know or who knows how long in whi..."
Scott presents a thought experiment involving an alien intelligence that exhibits human-like qualities. He discusses the implications of recognizing sentience in beings that may not share our biological makeup, urging listeners to consider the criteria for consciousness.
"unprocessed humans and and by that I mean like we can learn a lot in my opinion by watching kids right because they don't have any of the millions of social conditioning and everything that we adults ..."
Scott explores the complexities of granting rights to AI systems. He argues that if we consider an alien made of silicon as sentient, we must also examine the criteria that differentiate it from humans, challenging the audience to think critically about AI's place in society.
"in their na what I call humans in our natural state right like like before we decide on what's the correct answer machine they're trying to install in our head yeah yeah no I mean I mean certainly ano..."
Scott emphasizes the importance of establishing operational criteria to distinguish between human and AI consciousness. He critiques the tendency to rely on vague appeals to human experience, advocating for a more rigorous examination of what defines sentience.
"why is uh why do we think factoring is harder than multiplying you know you know I mean that's that's uh you know that that that is one of the highlights of my life you know is when I can you know get..."
In this segment, Scott discusses the hypothetical ability to create perfect backups of AI systems. He contrasts this with human experience, questioning whether such capabilities could alter our understanding of identity and continuity in consciousness.
"the fact that uh we are kind of imper you know these unpredictable things they might they might in the age of AI actually turn into our strps talk about that a little bit yeah I mean uh uh you know so..."
Scott delves into philosophical thought experiments regarding identity and consciousness in the context of AI. He raises questions about the implications of digital replication and the ethical considerations surrounding the existence of multiple copies of a person.
"uh you know would uh desert you know uh deserve rights or you know deserve the same consideration that we give right it's like you know imagine that that some some alien you know shows up from another..."
Scott Aaronson explores the philosophical implications of creating backup copies of ourselves. He discusses thought experiments about digital copies and the ethical considerations of what happens to the original version of a person. This segment raises questions about identity and the nature of consciousness in a world where backups could be commonplace.
"you into being well then I guess you can make a backup copy of yourself and that future and if you're going on a dangerous mountain climbing trip then you know you can just leave a backup first and uh..."
In this segment, Aaronson delves into the relationship between quantum mechanics and personal identity. He argues that the chaotic details of our brain's state may be crucial to who we are, suggesting that perfect copies cannot be made without losing essential aspects of our identity. This discussion highlights the fundamental differences between human consciousness and AI.
"that right I think uh okay let's let let's grant that that probably you or I wouldn't want to be the first ones to try it but you know suppose you're you're in a a society where this is common this is..."
Scott Aaronson explains the no-cloning theorem in quantum mechanics, emphasizing that exact copies of quantum states cannot be made without destruction. He connects this principle to human identity, suggesting that our unique experiences and decisions cannot be replicated, which sets us apart from AI systems that can generate infinite outputs.
"that you know and if it fires that might set off a Cascade of other events you know that might ultimately lead to uh you know you taking one job rather than another job or something uh but you know a ..."
Aaronson discusses the ephemeral nature of human decisions and how this uniqueness adds value to our actions compared to AI-generated content. He uses the example of Shakespeare's works to illustrate how human mortality and the inability to replicate experiences make our contributions more significant.
"about quantum mechanics okay and crucially here we're not talking about the brain being a quantum computer right we're not talking about it using entanglement or you know uh uh you know which some peo..."
In this engaging segment, Scott Aaronson references science fiction narratives that explore themes of identity and teleportation. He discusses how these stories often reflect our fears and curiosities about technology, particularly regarding the implications of creating copies of ourselves and the psychological effects of such experiences.
"had for example an AI Shakespeare right well you know Shakespeare I guess wrote 23 play no sorry thir 39 plays right 39 39 plays uh and some sonets and that's all we're ever going to get from Shakespe..."
Aaronson reflects on the ethical dilemmas posed by teleportation that destroys the original body. He connects this to quantum teleportation, explaining how it requires the destruction of the original state, which raises moral questions about identity and existence in a future where such technology might be possible.
"teleportation in his universe is that it actually does destroy your original human body yes and and one of the scenes is just brilliant because it's him he's groggy he thinks it's him and then he sees..."
In this thought-provoking segment, Scott Aaronson discusses the challenges of aligning AI with human values. He emphasizes the importance of not locking in outdated or harmful values as technology evolves, suggesting that we must encode a flexible understanding of ethics into AI systems to ensure they reflect our growth as a society.
"happens in technology there is some science fiction writer who got there first right and and so you know this this is an argument that many people you know you you know used to give why why not to wor..."
Aaronson provides an overview of quantum teleportation, explaining how it allows for the transfer of quantum states using classical information while destroying the original state. This segment highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and its implications for our understanding of identity and existence.
"system would uh you know we like we don't want to lock in and aify you know the values that Humanity currently holds you know presumably just like we look back on people in the 1700s and we find you k..."
In this segment, Scott Aaronson discusses the current state of quantum computing and the misconceptions surrounding it. He emphasizes the importance of firsthand experience with technology to discern reality from hype, particularly in a field where many claims can be misleading.
"the protocol you have to measure the first state right you know along with half of the uh the uh entangled pair and you measure it in a way that inherently destroys the first copy right and that's the..."
Aaronson shares insights on how to navigate the hype surrounding quantum computing. He discusses the challenges of distinguishing genuine advancements from exaggerated claims, emphasizing the need for transparency and practical experience to understand the true capabilities of quantum technologies.
"have to actually experience that but you know Al although although who knows yeah as I was listenting and I don't have it in my notes but you'll I'm sure know uh what I'm referring to I was reading re..."
Scott shares his experiences advising investors in quantum computing startups, outlining key questions they should ask. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the company's actual technological capabilities and the realistic timelines for achieving breakthroughs, cautioning against overly optimistic claims that lack scientific grounding.
"that they can just put out a press release saying you know we use the quantum computer to recognize handwriting we use the quantum computer to you know help uh rout Vehicles you know through a city ri..."
Aaronson reflects on the significant advancements in quantum computing over the past 25 years, particularly in controlling qubits. He discusses the critical threshold of fault tolerance and the implications of reaching it, while also acknowledging the ongoing challenges in demonstrating quantum advantages over classical computing.
"do this on my blog for 20 years and you know I can I can you know I'm able to reach some people but you know you know I don't you know orders of magnitude fewer people than the husters are able to rea..."
In this segment, Scott addresses the uncertainty surrounding the future applications of quantum computing. He highlights the known algorithms and their potential speedups, while cautioning against unsubstantiated claims of revolutionary breakthroughs. He stresses the need for a grounded understanding of quantum capabilities among startups and investors.
"would be being approached by startups or existing companies how if you were their advisor yes what would you urge them to do what questions would you have them ask so I have been an advisor to various..."
Aaronson discusses the two most promising applications of quantum computing: simulating quantum mechanics and breaking public key cryptography. He explains the economic significance of these applications and the challenges that remain in achieving practical quantum advantages, urging a realistic perspective on the technology's potential.
"right but then you know usually uh there were there were lots and lots of claims about you know uh what they can do experimentally uh uh what they're hoping to do in the next you know few years right ..."
Scott provides guidance on evaluating quantum computing startups, emphasizing the importance of honesty regarding their capabilities and timelines. He encourages investors to critically assess claims made by these companies and to seek a clear understanding of the technology's limitations and potential.
"the key crossover point where you know we expect things to uh to scale and you know uh uh uh we think you know if you could control two cubits with like 99.99% accuracy then you know you'd be probably..."
In this segment, Aaronson explores the relationship between quantum computing and artificial intelligence. He discusses the urgency of advancements in quantum technology, particularly in the context of cryptography, and the potential implications for security in a world where quantum capabilities are unlocked.
"speedups uh um you know at least at least uh uh uh uh can be can be obtained you know based on any of the known algorithms right and so so if they're not saying something that is rooted in you know on..."
Scott emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of quantum computing compared to AI. He discusses the clarity of issues surrounding quantum technology and the importance of recognizing its unique challenges and opportunities, particularly in relation to cryptography and its implications for security.
"quantum computer science and you know and and if if if someone is saying well you know we will use our quantum computer at least at first to simulate quantum mechanics we'll use it to you know simulat..."
Scott Aaronson discusses the importance of honesty in quantum computing startups and the misconceptions surrounding their potential. He emphasizes the need for investors to understand the realities of quantum algorithms and warns against those who oversell the technology as the next big leap for AI. This segment highlights the critical evaluation necessary when engaging with quantum computing ventures.
"let's say I'm Consulting you know is does this Quantum Computing startup understand all of that and are they honest about all of that right and you know if they are then I say okay well you know uh uh..."
In this segment, Aaronson clarifies the differences between quantum computing and artificial intelligence, asserting that while quantum computing has well-understood issues, AI presents more profound uncertainties. He discusses the geopolitical implications of quantum advancements, particularly in cryptography, and the urgency for secure encryption methods in a post-quantum world.
"algorithms and as I listened to you uh I I hearken back to the uh the kind of like uh azimoff's rules for robots and your idea of programming into the AI uh the idea of humans being special because of..."
Scott Aaronson elaborates on the potential threats quantum computers pose to current encryption methods. He explains the concept of post-quantum encryption and the efforts to develop quantum-resistant protocols. This segment underscores the importance of transitioning to secure encryption systems to protect sensitive data from future quantum capabilities.
"us in the west I would I would I mean yeah I mean we should we should we should clearly separate Quantum Computing and AI right two different discussions okay but uh uh you know that that that do inte..."
Aaronson discusses the complexities involved in upgrading encryption systems to be quantum-resistant. He highlights the risks of introducing new security vulnerabilities during this transition and the necessity for thorough scrutiny of new encryption methods. This segment emphasizes the ongoing challenges in ensuring data security in the face of evolving quantum technologies.
"specifically there is you know yes uh uh quantum computers would happen to be able to uh break most of the encryption that currently protects the internet okay but now you know now you know and and an..."
In this segment, Scott Aaronson reflects on the human factor in cybersecurity vulnerabilities. He shares anecdotes illustrating how human error often undermines even the best security systems. This discussion highlights the importance of addressing human behavior in the context of cybersecurity, particularly as quantum computing becomes more prevalent.
"there has been a whole push to to do what's called postquantum encryption or Quantum resistant encryption okay and these are new forms of encryption you know mostly still just on classical computers r..."
Aaronson addresses common misconceptions about quantum computing, emphasizing that it is not a panacea for all computational problems. He explains the specific capabilities of quantum computers and the inherent limitations they face. This segment aims to clarify the realistic expectations surrounding quantum technology and its applications.
"they did decide to uh use these lattice-based encryption systems and so you know now now there's like a giant uh kind of you know uh a giant but mundane problem you could say of you know get you know ..."
In this segment, Scott Aaronson delves into the principles of quantum mechanics that underpin quantum computing. He explains the concept of superposition and the challenges of extracting useful information from quantum states. This discussion provides insight into the fundamental differences between classical and quantum computation.
"right they just haven't been studied enough right they might be you know you know it might be that even as we fortified you know our front door and put a moat with alligators and you know we left the ..."
Aaronson discusses the ongoing efforts to secure cryptographic systems against quantum threats. He highlights the challenges in proving the security of both current and future encryption methods. This segment emphasizes the importance of continued research and vigilance in the field of cryptography as quantum computing evolves.
"and math you know like the P versus NP problem right are are are are are very much related to that you know to like proving that P is not equal to NP would be a prerequisite to proving any of these cr..."
In this segment, Scott Aaronson shares insights on the human vulnerabilities that persist in cybersecurity, regardless of technological advancements. He discusses how social engineering can compromise security systems and the need for awareness and training to mitigate these risks. This segment highlights the critical role of human behavior in cybersecurity.
"yeah there's a lot of work that has to be done including by the way upgrading the architecture of Bitcoin and ethereum and all the other cryptocurrencies uh to use these Quantum resistant encryption s..."
Aaronson reflects on the challenges posed by human behavior in cybersecurity, likening it to an operating system problem. He discusses the ease with which individuals can be manipulated into compromising security protocols. This segment underscores the necessity of addressing human factors in the development of secure systems.
"you know you could have the best you know cyber security in the world right but if someone calls you know uh uh uh the person in charge and says like hey this is Bob from you know over in Tech do you ..."
In this segment, Scott Aaronson critiques the notion that AI can be safely contained. He discusses the reality of AI deployment and the challenges of ensuring safety in an interconnected world. This discussion highlights the urgency of addressing AI safety as technologies continue to advance.
"whatever right that's a that's a that's not a computer science problem you could say that's a that's a that's a human problem yeah it's definitely a human OS problem and it reminds me of Terry prer uh..."
Aaronson concludes by reiterating that quantum computers, while powerful, have their limitations. He emphasizes that they are not a universal solution and that understanding their capabilities is crucial. This segment aims to ground expectations regarding the future of quantum computing.
"to happen right it's like we know that that that that horse has left the barn right you know there are already like you know GPT enabled agents that people have released onto the internet to like with..."
Scott Aaronson explains the concept of superposition in quantum computing, emphasizing that while a quantum computer can represent multiple states simultaneously, the challenge lies in measuring these states to obtain useful outputs. He discusses how quantum mechanics introduces unique probabilities, including negative amplitudes, which differ from classical probability, and how these properties are essential for achieving computational speed-ups.
"you can create what's called a superp position of many different States including of all the different answers to your computational problem right like you know that the that that you can do okay the ..."
In this segment, Scott delves into the intricacies of quantum interference and how it plays a crucial role in quantum computing. He describes the need to choreograph amplitudes to ensure that the contributions to the right answer reinforce each other while those for incorrect answers cancel out. This careful orchestration is vital for achieving a high probability of measuring the correct output from a quantum computer.
"blah blah blah right and but but the truth is you know if it was just a matter of God rolling some dice once in a while that wouldn't be a big deal okay that you know you could you could sort of handl..."
Scott uses the metaphor of a 'quantum hammer' to illustrate the unique capabilities of quantum computers. He discusses the challenge of identifying which problems can benefit from quantum speed-ups and highlights the significant discovery made by Peter Shor regarding the potential for quantum computers to factor large numbers efficiently, which has profound implications for encryption and security.
"means that that event won't happen at all okay uh whereas for other uh uh possible events right I C if I can get the the uh uh uh all the contributions to their amplitudes to be pointing the same way ..."
Scott addresses the ongoing search for practical applications of quantum computing beyond simulating quantum mechanics. He discusses the potential for quantum computers to impact various fields, including chemistry, material science, and drug development, while acknowledging the challenges in finding significant advantages over classical computing methods.
"part is first of all I've got to choreograph all that even though I don't know myself which answer is the right one right if I already knew what would be the point right and secondly I've got to do al..."
In this segment, Scott shares examples of potential breakthroughs that could arise from quantum simulations, such as improving fertilizer production and discovering new high-temperature superconductors. He emphasizes the importance of using quantum computers to tackle complex chemical reactions and societal challenges, while also noting that these tools won't provide instant solutions but could significantly advance our understanding.
"blame us they say you know what have you been doing all this time right where you know like it's like it's like the the story of Rumple stilt skin right you know you Spa this straw into gold so why no..."
Scott discusses the NP-complete problems and the implications of quantum computing on these complex challenges. He explains the significance of the P vs NP question and the conjecture that NP-complete problems may not be efficiently solvable by quantum computers. This segment highlights the theoretical limits of quantum computing and the ongoing exploration of its capabilities in solving difficult computational problems.
"that you you know with at least one of them you will make a discovery that will uh uh you know have a big impact on chemistry or Material Science or or or or or or Nuclear Physics or or or some area l..."
Scott addresses common misconceptions about the practical applications of quantum computers, particularly the belief that they will enhance everyday tasks like gaming or email. He clarifies that many software issues stem from bugs rather than computational complexity, and emphasizes that quantum computers are better viewed as specialized accelerators for specific problems rather than general-purpose devices.
"the grover speed up which roughly speaking lets you solve NP complete problems and about the square root of the number of steps that a classical computer would need so you get some Advantage but you k..."
In this segment, Scott discusses the future relevance of quantum computers in personal devices. He argues that the cloud will likely serve as the primary access point for quantum computing resources, making personal quantum computers unnecessary. Scott emphasizes the need for quantum computers to tackle specific problems that classical computers struggle with, rather than mundane tasks.
"okay but then you know sometimes when I when I talk to late people about this like they're under the impression well you know I'm going to have a quantum computer on my phone and it'll help me you kno..."
Scott reflects on the challenges of conveying the true potential of quantum computing to the public. He shares anecdotes about common frustrations with technology and highlights the importance of understanding the meaningful advancements quantum computing could bring, such as breakthroughs in fertilizer production. This segment underscores the gap between public perception and the actual capabilities of quantum technology.
"these you know special problems where we can choreograph these interference patterns to get uh uh these big speed ups and we don't know exactly how big that class of problems is you know we've been tr..."
Scott shares a story about a customer service chatbot from Air Canada that provided incorrect information, leading to a legal ruling. He contrasts the chatbot's empathetic response with the rigid adherence to policy by human representatives. This segment explores the implications of AI in customer service and the need for human-like understanding in bureaucratic systems.
"we can't print something out because you know the printer driver doesn't work or you know you take the the crowd strike thing that happened you know a month ago where like a large fraction of all the ..."
In a whimsical thought experiment, Scott is asked what two ideas he would implant in the world's population if he could. He suggests the Golden Rule for morality and a principle of rationality related to understanding base rates. This segment encapsulates Scott's vision for a more empathetic and rational society, emphasizing the importance of these foundational concepts.
"for the bement fair right and the chatbot said yeah that's fine and then and then the humans you know overrode that they said no you know you can't and it doesn't matter that the chatbot said that bec..."