
46 segments available
Do tariffs help rebuild American manufacturing or hold it back? In this episode, American Compass founder and chief economist Oren Cass sits down with commentator and author Noah Smith and a16z General Partner Erik Torenberg for a lively debate on the future of U.S. industry. They discuss the case for tariff-driven re-industrialization versus free-market approaches, the role of allies in trade policy, and what the numbers really show about manufacturing jobs, investment, and output. Along the way, they challenge each other’s assumptions and explore what it would take to actually bring more production back to American soil. Timecodes: 0:00 Introduction & Framing the Free Trade Debate 0:50 American Compass & Economic Philosophy 3:50 The Limits of Free Markets and Policy Implications 5:04 Rethinking Comparative Advantage & Modern Trade 9:08 Tariffs: American Tradition vs. Chinese Strategy 10:25 Evaluating the Impact of Trump’s Tariffs 12:15 Short-Term Pain vs. Long-Term Gain in Manufacturing 15:41 Data, Indicators, and the State of US Manufacturing 24:21 The Role of Industrial Policy and Workforce Development 45:24 Trade Deficits and Scale 52:23 Global Competition 1:02:40 Negotiating with Allies and the Limits of Tariff Threats Resources: Find Oren on X: https://https://x.com/oren_cass American Compass: https://americancompass.org/ Find Noah on X: https://x.com/noahpinion Subscribe to Noah’s Substack: https://www.noahpinion.blog/ Stay Updated: Let us know what you think: https://ratethispodcast.com/a16z Find a16z on Twitter: https://twitter.com/a16z Find a16z on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a16z Subscribe on your favorite podcast app: https://a16z.simplecast.com/ Follow our host: https://x.com/eriktorenberg Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures.
Oren Cass introduces the debate on whether free trade with China promotes free markets or distorts them. He argues that engaging in free trade with a non-market economy like China can hinder the advancement of true free markets, emphasizing the importance of understanding trade dynamics beyond mere deficits and surpluses.
"The question is does free trade with China advance free markets or does it distort and wreck our free market? We have treated free trade as the natural extension of free market. If you are attempt to ..."
Oren Cass discusses the founding of American Compass in 2020, aiming to restore an economic consensus that values family, community, and industry. He critiques the excessive faith in markets and highlights the need for a new economic approach that prioritizes human flourishing over corporate profits.
"trade between us and Europe is positive sum without trade you know being balanced trade is positive sum we're really excited to to to have you on because we've been talking about some some topics over..."
Cass raises questions about how restoring American manufacturing can strengthen family and community ties. He reflects on the challenges of linking manufacturing to social outcomes, drawing comparisons with countries like Germany and South Korea that have high manufacturing shares but face social issues.
"Sure. Yeah, I'll I'll try to keep it short. Let me know if you want me to say more about anything. Uh but I founded American Compass back in 2020 uh with the mission to restore an economic consensus t..."
Cass critiques traditional economic models taught in introductory courses, arguing they oversimplify the complexities of modern economies. He emphasizes the need for policies that reflect the realities of manufactured goods and the strategic choices countries make to develop economic advantages.
"actually going to take care a lot of the of the things that matter most to people. And and that pairing of family community, and industry maybe seems a little bit odd. Those aren't three things that a..."
Cass discusses the misconception that trade is always beneficial, highlighting the current U.S. trade deficit as an example of exchanging goods for assets rather than tangible benefits. He argues for a reevaluation of how trade impacts the economy and the importance of policy in shaping outcomes.
"Um let me say a little bit more about the kind of the the broader question first and and then if we want to to dive into the manufacturing piece certainly we can. Um you know I I think the to to your ..."
Cass challenges the assumption that free trade is synonymous with free markets, arguing that engaging with non-market economies like China can distort market principles. He advocates for a nuanced understanding of how trade policies can impact domestic markets.
"at all. You can have the situation we have in the American economy today represented by a a you know trillion plus dollar trade deficit in which you are exchanging goods for assets. And so if you imag..."
Cass outlines his policy proposals, including reduced immigration and trade protectionism, arguing that these strategies reflect historical American practices. He emphasizes the need for policies that account for global competition, particularly from China.
"You know, we do a lot of work also on industrial policy, on financial markets and investment flows, on labor policy uh on competition policy, but all of it ultimately follows the same template of aski..."
Cass discusses the potential long-term benefits of Trump's tariffs on U.S. manufacturing output and employment. He emphasizes the importance of consistent policy commitments and complementary measures to support domestic industry.
"they might be doing some sort of uh pro-fertility policy, but historically China has been the poster child for extremely unwise anti-fertility policy. So, uh, I I wouldn't characterize anything of wha..."
The discussion shifts to the current state of manufacturing indicators in the U.S. Cass acknowledges challenges faced by manufacturers but argues that it is too early to determine the overall impact of tariffs on the manufacturing sector.
"think a you know a good proxy is how long did it take Japanese automakers to set up in the US after their imports into the US were uh badly constrained. Uh and then I think from there a lot of it come..."
Cass expresses cautious optimism about the manufacturing sector's response to tariffs, citing examples of companies adjusting their investments. He argues that the long-term effects of tariffs may lead to a resurgence in domestic manufacturing.
"now uh apparently as a result of the tariffs is simply temporary pain for long-term gain. We just have to stay the course. Is that an accurate summary of what you're telling me? Well, I guess I'd pref..."
Cass emphasizes the significance of capital investment in revitalizing the manufacturing sector. He discusses the timeline for seeing tangible results from tariffs, suggesting that sustained investment over the next few years is essential for achieving long-term manufacturing growth.
"if the goal is not to, you know, make America the assembly hub of the world but to actually re-industrialize you have to actually create incentives to to bring back those intermediate supplies. You ca..."
In this segment, Cass addresses the expectations surrounding manufacturing employment in the wake of tariff policies. He argues that immediate job growth should not be expected, as the effects of tariffs will take time to materialize in the labor market.
"believe we'll get longer in a later in August. There is uh various you know manufacturing sentiment indications. There is actual kind of industrial output capacity utilization these kinds of measures...."
Cass discusses various manufacturing sentiment indicators and their implications for the industry. He highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of these metrics to gauge the health of the manufacturing sector accurately.
"Uh, are you you know um what PMIs are right? Uh, yeah. But so what are Yeah. So I mean feel free to educate me. the Institute for Supply Management, which is a, you know, consortium kind of thing. The..."
The conversation turns to recent manufacturing data, including the Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) and employment statistics. Cass and Smith debate the reliability of these indicators and their correlation with broader economic trends.
"Bloomberg article from uh the first of this month. It said US factory activity contracted in June for a fourth consecutive month as orders and employment shrank at a faster pace extending the malaise ..."
Cass reflects on the predictions made by economists regarding the impact of tariffs on manufacturing. He argues that while short-term pain is evident, the long-term benefits of reshoring and increased capital investment should not be overlooked.
"correlated with you know government statistics on how manufacturing is doing. And so I'm wondering where's the alternative statistics? Where are the numbers I'm not seeing that show good news in the m..."
In this segment, Cass critiques the economic consensus surrounding tariffs and their predicted effects. He emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in economic forecasting.
"argument from the other side, right when the argument was, you know, okay we're going to aggressively expand free trade. We're going to embrace China. Um and oh, we got a lot of initial negative resul..."
Cass discusses the importance of productivity in the manufacturing sector and how it relates to capital investment. He argues that a successful reshoring effort must also focus on improving productivity metrics to ensure sustainable growth.
"predictions of everything that was going to go wrong initially have have have essentially been wrong. I mean that what about the data I just read you? What about that? I mean that was an economist eco..."
The debate continues as Cass and Smith explore what would need to happen for them to change their views on the long-term effects of tariffs. Cass emphasizes the importance of observing capital investment trends as a key indicator of success.
"actually step back and recognize that it does seem the world's a little bit more complicated than that. I agree that the world is complicated and I agree that there's a lot of uncertainty over the imp..."
Cass reiterates the significance of capital investment in reshoring efforts. He discusses how sustained investment in domestic production capacity is crucial for achieving the desired outcomes of tariff policies.
"economists about that pain in the manufacturing sector and that's exactly what all the data are showing us now. Yeah, I I've been extremely explicit throughout in in discussing tariffs that that there..."
In this segment, Cass reflects on the shortcomings of traditional economic models in predicting the effects of tariffs. He emphasizes the need for a broader perspective that incorporates various factors influencing economic outcomes.
"think the good news is that there are other dimensions on which we should see things sooner. capital investment construction, and so forth are going to be a leading indicator of that. But I'm I'm not ..."
Oren Cass discusses the potential for revitalizing American manufacturing through increased domestic investment. He emphasizes the importance of sustained investment levels across various sectors and the need for improved productivity in manufacturing to ensure long-term growth and job creation.
"domestic production capacity. Um I I think if we see that and you know frankly in a lot of ways that that was already at elevated levels because of you know other things that Noah and I agree on like ..."
Cass addresses the challenges of predicting the effects of tariffs on the economy. He explores the shortcomings of traditional economic models and emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of how tariffs can impact manufacturing and investment decisions.
"as well. So I have a uh another question here which is that you've often talked about the um what you see as the shortcomings of economics you know as a discipline uh for predicting the effects of tar..."
In this segment, Cass outlines his views on industrial policy as a crucial element for revitalizing manufacturing. He argues for free trade with allies while recognizing the competitive threat posed by China, advocating for a strategic approach to tariffs that supports domestic production.
"coming from? Well, I guess I happy to answer that in detail. I want to I figured no that that you were going to touch on the prior question also, but I'll I'll just add that's the prior question. I'm ..."
Cass highlights key indicators for assessing the health of the manufacturing sector, particularly focusing on factory construction trends. He discusses the impact of recent industrial policies and the need for ongoing investment to reverse declining trends in manufacturing capacity.
"sidetrack uh for me right there. I I you know I I wrote about all these things pretty extensively during the Biden years and I thought this is what we ought to be doing. But I think industrial policy ..."
Cass emphasizes the need for stability and certainty in tariff policies to encourage long-term investments in manufacturing. He critiques the inconsistency of past tariff strategies and stresses the importance of a coherent industrial policy to support domestic manufacturing.
"a bad sign to me, but I I accept that in 5 years we may see something else. I'm just sorry genuinely curious which because that was when I mentioned I'm very interested to see in August what the Q2 um..."
In this segment, Cass critiques the reliance on outdated economic models that fail to accurately predict the effects of tariffs and free trade. He argues for a perspective that prioritizes domestic investment and considers the real-world implications of trade policies on American manufacturing.
"Okay. Um yeah, I mean I think the uh I would just echo some of what uh you know what what Noah had just said about some of these other factors that that I think are really important as well because uh..."
Cass reflects on historical examples of tariffs in the U.S. and their impact on economic growth. He discusses the arguments for and against tariffs, drawing on economic theories and the experiences of other countries to support his case for a more protectionist approach to trade.
"And and so me for me the question is what are the incentives for people pursuing private profit and and if we have policies that uh make it the incentive to offshore to uh you know try to bring in che..."
Oren Cass elaborates on the strategic use of tariffs as a bargaining tool against China, particularly regarding currency undervaluation. He distinguishes between using tariffs as a protective measure for manufacturing and as a threat to influence China's economic policies. The conversation highlights the nuanced role tariffs can play in international trade negotiations.
"overall would become enriched because of other effects in the service industry in other industries. And so when you're talking about these predictions that free trade with China would be uh beneficial..."
The discussion shifts to game theory and the rationality of economic actors. Cass argues that credible threats can deter irrational actors like China, but emphasizes that tariffs should not be viewed as a means to harm U.S. interests. The segment critiques the notion of economic warfare and stresses the importance of prioritizing American prosperity over punitive measures.
"know, there's definitely reasons why tariffs would have hurt the manufacturing sector and there's reasons why it could have helped. Um, for example, if you had uh used tariffs as a kind of bargaining ..."
Cass discusses the significance of scale in manufacturing, referencing Paul Krugman's work. He explains how China's vast market allows for unprecedented production scales, making it difficult for the U.S. to compete without forming strategic partnerships with allies. The segment emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to enhance U.S. manufacturing capabilities.
"their currency would have been a good idea for our manufacturing industry and for us in general. Um, but that doesn't mean that tariffs are a policy that that if actually implemented help manufacturin..."
In this segment, Cass advocates for pooling markets with allies like Europe, Japan, and Korea to achieve competitive scale against China. He highlights the necessity of reciprocal trade agreements that benefit both U.S. and allied manufacturers. The conversation underscores the importance of collaboration in addressing global manufacturing challenges.
"then fine. That's certainly an argument you can make. But if we're talking about helping our manufacturing sector helping our people's living standards in general, hurting them double the amount we hu..."
The discussion addresses trade imbalances with key allies and the misconception of focusing solely on net exports. Cass argues that gross exports should be prioritized, as they reflect the overall health of trade relationships. This segment challenges conventional views on trade deficits and emphasizes the benefits of increased exports for U.S. manufacturers.
"market such that we have a large market too so we can compete with the Chinese because we can match them for scale. Now the only way to do that given our small size is to get other countries to pull t..."
Cass concludes by illustrating the importance of gross exports over net exports in trade discussions. He provides a concrete example to demonstrate how increasing exports can lead to better outcomes for U.S. manufacturers, even in the face of trade deficits. This segment reinforces the idea that trade relationships should be evaluated on their overall growth potential.
"is with China. You know when you when you describe Germany's strategy as export export export that is of course Japan's strategy and and Korea's strategy certainly vis the US v the US and so itap I me..."
The debate continues as Noah Smith explains how increased exports to Germany could potentially reduce domestic sales of American-made cars. He emphasizes the need to consider the overall demand for manufactured goods and how trade dynamics affect domestic production.
"the total market size available to our manufacturers. And so I think we, you know, obviously trade deficits are always a sore spot because people have an inherent sense of fairness and they worry abou..."
Oren Cass argues that increased trade can lead to lower production costs, allowing for greater vehicle ownership and overall consumption. He discusses how scaling manufacturing can benefit both U.S. producers and consumers, despite the complexities of trade deficits.
"cars to Germany but Germany is exporting 12 billion of cars to the US unless you've created an extra $2 billion of demand for cars you've just reduced US car sales right um So if no you well I mean th..."
The conversation shifts to the implications of trade deficits on U.S. manufacturing. Oren Cass and Noah Smith explore the nuances of trade balances, questioning the simplistic view that trade deficits inherently harm domestic production.
"Right? And so the point is that um when you when you have um two countries and they start trading, does the number of cars that people consume go up? Absolutely. Does it go up by more than the number ..."
Noah Smith highlights the historical trajectory of U.S. industrial output, noting that despite trade deficits, manufacturing productivity rose during periods of globalization. He challenges the notion that trade deficits directly correlate with declines in domestic manufacturing.
"right but if you look at GM if you look at GM total vehicle production while you're looking that up I let me just make two related points one is that this strikes me as a a classic example of what goe..."
The discussion delves into the complexities of U.S. manufacturing output and trade deficits, with Noah Smith emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of economic patterns rather than relying on surface-level interpretations of trade data.
"flatlined since 2007. now since 2007. That's right. But during the time of the China shock, it didn't actually flatline. It actually rose. Yeah, there was still a period of increase there. But but if ..."
Oren Cass and Noah Smith debate the relationship between trade deficits and economic growth, with Cass arguing that trade can be a positive-sum game. They explore how trade dynamics can influence overall market demand and manufacturing capabilities.
"US manufacturing grew and grew during the era of hyper globalization and during the you know increase in competition from Germany and Japan in the 80s and even during the initial increase of competiti..."
The conversation turns to strategies for addressing trade imbalances with allies. Oren Cass suggests using negotiations and market access as tools to rectify these issues, while Noah Smith questions the effectiveness of such approaches.
"must be getting destroyed. And that said, I do think trade deficits present a problem. Um, if they're too large, if they're for the wrong reasons if we're just borrowing to consume, it's a, you know, ..."
The debate concludes with reflections on the Trump administration's trade policies and the potential for establishing a free trade zone with allies. The participants discuss the implications of using tariffs and market access as leverage in trade negotiations.
"No no that uh Yeah this this fascinates me, right? Because it seems to me that we're like if you think about okay what the Trump administration posture has been are you giggling because you're imagini..."
The conversation shifts to the credibility of tariffs as a negotiating tactic. One speaker argues that using tariffs against allies could ultimately benefit China, undermining U.S. interests. They discuss the paradox of threatening tariffs that could hurt both the U.S. and its allies, questioning the rationale behind such strategies and whether they truly serve as effective negotiation tools.
"I don't know. I um so if we're saying that we're going to use the threat of tariffs to establish a free trade zone you know, that's but that but that because of game theory, because the idea that acto..."
This segment delves into the distinction between using tariffs as a temporary negotiating tool versus establishing them as a long-term policy. The speakers debate the implications of tariffs on American manufacturing and the broader economy, emphasizing the need for a coherent strategy that balances immediate threats with sustainable economic growth.
"response to this idea. The second point is if this is your argument, we're back in the realm of tariffs are bad, but they're a good threat because we're threating threatening to shoot ourselves in the..."
The discussion continues with a focus on the potential long-term effects of current tariff policies on U.S. manufacturing. The speakers consider the timeline for evaluating the success of tariffs in reshoring production and the importance of accompanying workforce development policies. They highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to ensure that tariffs do not hinder investment in the manufacturing sector.
"latter. So those are two important counter-arguments I think to what you're saying here. Yeah. I guess I would just say on on the first point, first of all, it it apparently at least at the moment is ..."
In this segment, the speakers find common ground regarding the necessity of tariffs on certain strategic industries, particularly concerning China. They discuss the importance of balancing trade policies that support domestic production while recognizing the complexities of global trade dynamics. The conversation emphasizes the need for a thoughtful approach to tariffs that considers both economic and national security interests.
"you were describing. Um and and then on the second point I I would just say it's interesting and and quite satisfying perhaps to the extent to which we are landing in in a a very similar place at the ..."
The final segment reflects on the future of U.S. manufacturing in light of current tariff policies. The speakers discuss the importance of monitoring investment responses and workforce development initiatives over the next few years. They emphasize the need for ongoing evaluation of tariff strategies to ensure they effectively promote domestic manufacturing without unintended negative consequences.
"could do it in a way that actually had long-term certainty and predictability. Uh, and if you could actually also then use it as a revenue source, which meant that relatively speaking, you're also nee..."