
34 segments available
Michael Huemer is a professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado. He is the author of more than sixty academic articles in epistemology, ethics, metaethics, metaphysics, and political philosophy, as well as eight amazing books. Episode website: https://www.dwarkeshpatel.com/p/ michael-huemer Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/3TwQB2Q Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3e5QB9U Read Michael's awesome blog: http://fakenous.net/ Follow me on Twitter to be notified of future content: https://twitter.com/dwarkesh_sp Buy Knowledge, Reality, and Value: https://amzn.to/3KybHK2 Buy The Problem of Political Authority: https://amzn.to/3PXEqcB Timestamps: 0:00:00 Intro 0:01:07 The Problem of Political Authority 0:03:25 Common sense ethics 0:09:39 Stockholm syndrome and the charisma of power 0:18:14 Moral progress 0:26:55 Growth of libertarian ideas 0:33:37 Does anarchy increase violence? 0:44:37 Transitioning to anarchy 0:47:20 Is Huemer attacking our society?! 0:51:40 Huemer's writing process 0:53:18 Is it okay to work for the government 0:56:39 Burkean argument against anarchy 1:02:07 The case for tyranny 1:11:58 Underrated/overrated 1:25:55 Huemer production functionl 1:30:41 Favorite books 1:33:04 Advice for young people
In this segment, the host introduces Professor Michael Huemer, highlighting his credentials as a leading philosopher and author. Huemer's latest book, 'Knowledge, Reality, and Value,' is recommended for its clarity and accessibility, covering essential philosophical arguments. The conversation sets the stage for a deep dive into Huemer's thoughts on political authority.
"hello folks and welcome to the lunar society podcast today it is my great privilege to talk with professor michael humer he is in my opinion the best philosopher alive he's a professor of philosophy a..."
In this segment, the host introduces Professor Michael Huemer, highlighting his credentials as a leading philosopher and author. Huemer's latest book, 'Knowledge, Reality, and Value,' is recommended for its clarity and comprehensive coverage of philosophical arguments. The conversation sets the stage for a deep dive into Huemer's views on political authority.
"hello folks and welcome to the lunar society podcast today it is my great privilege to talk with professor michael humer he is in my opinion the best philosopher alive he's a professor of philosophy a..."
Michael Huemer discusses the central theme of his book, 'The Problem of Political Authority.' He questions the moral basis for government authority, exploring why governments can command obedience in ways that ordinary individuals cannot. Huemer illustrates this with the contrast between taxation and extortion, prompting a reevaluation of the moral status attributed to government actions.
"okay professor humor uh what is the problem political authority what did you write this book yeah so uh you know here's a copy of the book uh and uh you can order it on amazon that's the important thi..."
Michael Huemer discusses the central theme of his book, 'The Problem of Political Authority.' He explores the philosophical question of why governments have the authority to command and enforce obedience, contrasting it with common moral intuitions about individual rights and extortion. This segment raises critical questions about the moral status of government actions compared to those of ordinary citizens.
"okay professor humor uh what is the problem political authority what did you write this book yeah so uh you know here's a copy of the book uh and uh you can order it on amazon that's the important thi..."
Huemer delves into the contradictions between common sense ethics and political philosophy. He argues that while people generally accept government authority, they also recognize the need for an explanation of this authority. This segment highlights the ethical intuitions that apply to individuals and how they differ from perceptions of state authority, emphasizing the need for a coherent moral framework.
"so you're pointing out a contradiction between common sense morality and common sense political philosophy why should we resolve that contradiction in favor of uh common sense intuitions rather than y..."
In this segment, Huemer contrasts common sense ethical intuitions with political philosophy. He argues that while people generally accept the authority of the government, they also recognize the need for an explanation of this authority. Huemer emphasizes that ethical standards should apply equally to the state and ordinary individuals, challenging the conventional acceptance of governmental power.
"so you're pointing out a contradiction between common sense morality and common sense political philosophy why should we resolve that contradiction in favor of uh common sense intuitions rather than y..."
Huemer introduces the concept of Stockholm Syndrome as a metaphor for the emotional bond people may form with those in power. He discusses how this psychological phenomenon can lead individuals to support authority figures, even when they may be acting against their interests. This segment explores the implications of such biases in the context of government authority.
"way of looking at them so let me ask you about the uh biases you were talking about one of the ones you point out in the book is stockholm syndrome where a victim of abuse will feel loyalty towards he..."
In this segment, Huemer introduces the concept of Stockholm Syndrome as a metaphor for how individuals may develop loyalty to those in power, including government authorities. He discusses the evolutionary basis for this phenomenon and how it can lead to misplaced trust in authority figures, raising questions about the psychological dynamics at play in societal structures.
"way of looking at them so let me ask you about the uh biases you were talking about one of the ones you point out in the book is stockholm syndrome where a victim of abuse will feel loyalty towards he..."
In this segment, Huemer reflects on the idea of moral progress and how it relates to political authority. He questions whether societal advancements in ethics can coexist with the traditional views of government power. This discussion invites listeners to consider the evolution of moral standards and their impact on the legitimacy of authority.
"so so then why do you think moral progress is likely if the average person cares about power or you know is more is more convinced to buy a power itself than convincing arguments or by people who care..."
Huemer reflects on the idea of moral progress, discussing how societal values evolve over time. He examines the implications of this progress for political authority and the ethical standards applied to governments versus individuals. This segment encourages listeners to consider how moral advancements can challenge existing political structures.
"so so then why do you think moral progress is likely if the average person cares about power or you know is more is more convinced to buy a power itself than convincing arguments or by people who care..."
Huemer discusses the rise of libertarian ideas and their challenge to conventional political authority. He examines the skepticism that libertarians hold towards government power and how this perspective differs from mainstream political thought. This segment highlights the increasing relevance of libertarianism in contemporary discussions about authority and governance.
"uh so i'm gonna try to critique that view actually um like it you could say that the change in attitudes over the last few centuries has been towards greater respect for the individual a stronger pres..."
In this segment, Huemer discusses the rise of libertarian ideas and their challenge to traditional political authority. He explores how libertarianism promotes skepticism about government power and advocates for applying the same moral standards to the state as to individuals. This discussion highlights the philosophical underpinnings of libertarian thought.
"uh so i'm gonna try to critique that view actually um like it you could say that the change in attitudes over the last few centuries has been towards greater respect for the individual a stronger pres..."
In this thought-provoking segment, Huemer addresses the common concern that anarchy may lead to increased violence. He explores the arguments for and against this notion, encouraging a deeper understanding of the relationship between governance and societal order. This discussion challenges listeners to reconsider their assumptions about authority and its necessity.
"actual view then uh i i'm gonna try to play devil's advocate now uh so there's uh hobbs had this idea that in order people go engage in violence to steal each other's stuff or to launch preemptive str..."
Huemer addresses the common concern that anarchy may lead to increased violence. He presents arguments for and against this notion, encouraging a nuanced understanding of how societal structures influence behavior. This segment invites listeners to critically evaluate the relationship between governance and societal order.
"actual view then uh i i'm gonna try to play devil's advocate now uh so there's uh hobbs had this idea that in order people go engage in violence to steal each other's stuff or to launch preemptive str..."
Huemer discusses the practical implications of transitioning to an anarchist society. He outlines potential pathways and challenges that may arise during this shift. This segment provides insights into the feasibility of anarchy as a political system and the societal changes it would entail.
"but so but you know it matters how this whole thing comes about right so if if the anarchy comes about by you know one day the government just disappears right and the cops disappear then it would be ..."
In this brief segment, Huemer discusses the practical considerations of transitioning to an anarchist society. He outlines potential challenges and benefits, prompting listeners to think about the feasibility of such a shift in political structure.
"but so but you know it matters how this whole thing comes about right so if if the anarchy comes about by you know one day the government just disappears right and the cops disappear then it would be ..."
The conversation turns to whether Huemer's critiques of political authority can be seen as an attack on society itself. He clarifies his position, emphasizing that questioning authority is not inherently anti-social but rather a call for deeper ethical reflection.
"you you wrote a blog post uh a few months back where you were criticizing social justice warriors and the 1619 project in particular and here's what you wrote uh you said you at the top of the post is..."
In this segment, the host questions whether Huemer's critiques of political authority can be seen as an attack on society itself. Huemer clarifies his position, emphasizing that his goal is to provoke thought and discussion rather than to undermine societal structures. This conversation delves into the implications of questioning authority.
"you you wrote a blog post uh a few months back where you were criticizing social justice warriors and the 1619 project in particular and here's what you wrote uh you said you at the top of the post is..."
Huemer shares insights into his writing process, discussing how he approaches complex philosophical topics. This segment provides a glimpse into the mind of a prolific philosopher and author, revealing the dedication required to articulate challenging ideas.
"but by the way how long does it take you to write a blog post because they're all so good and you write so many of them is are you just writing it like one state of flow how much editing does it take ..."
Huemer shares insights into his writing process, discussing how he approaches complex philosophical topics. He reflects on the challenges of articulating his ideas clearly and effectively. This segment offers a glimpse into the mind of a prolific philosopher and author.
"but by the way how long does it take you to write a blog post because they're all so good and you write so many of them is are you just writing it like one state of flow how much editing does it take ..."
In this thought-provoking segment, Huemer tackles the ethical implications of working for the government. He explores the moral dilemmas faced by individuals in public service and the broader societal impact of government employment.
"wouldn't ask is it unethical of you to believe that coercion coercion is evil but your your job is subsidized by the fruits of that coercion is that unethical of you to have that kind of job um i don'..."
In this segment, Huemer tackles the ethical implications of working for the government. He explores the moral considerations that individuals should weigh when deciding to engage with state institutions. This discussion prompts listeners to reflect on their own roles within the framework of political authority.
"wouldn't ask is it unethical of you to believe that coercion coercion is evil but your your job is subsidized by the fruits of that coercion is that unethical of you to have that kind of job um i don'..."
Huemer discusses the Burkean argument against anarchy, which posits that established institutions provide necessary stability. He critiques this perspective, encouraging listeners to consider alternative views on governance and societal order.
"capitalism for you uh and see how you respond so the first is a sort of burkina argument like we shouldn't try things that haven't worked before yeah yeah i mean um yeah you know you can imagine someb..."
Huemer presents a Burkean argument against anarchy, discussing the philosophical foundations of this perspective. He examines the historical context and reasoning behind the belief that some form of governance is necessary for societal stability. This segment invites listeners to consider the merits of traditional political thought.
"capitalism for you uh and see how you respond so the first is a sort of burkina argument like we shouldn't try things that haven't worked before yeah yeah i mean um yeah you know you can imagine someb..."
In a provocative discussion, Huemer explores the case for tyranny, challenging conventional views on governance. He examines the arguments that suggest a tyrannical regime may sometimes be preferable to chaos. This segment encourages critical thinking about the nature of authority and its implications for society.
"which is uh sort of the nick bostrom uh vulnerable worlds hypothesis if you've heard of that basically the idea is with every new technology you discover there's some small chance that it it allows us..."
In a controversial turn, Huemer presents arguments for tyranny, challenging conventional views on authority and governance. This segment invites listeners to engage with provocative ideas about power and control in society.
"which is uh sort of the nick bostrom uh vulnerable worlds hypothesis if you've heard of that basically the idea is with every new technology you discover there's some small chance that it it allows us..."
Huemer participates in a discussion about concepts or ideas that are often underrated or overrated in philosophical discourse. This segment encourages critical thinking about societal values and the perceptions of various ideologies.
"programming language language that i guess nobody uses anymore um but you know it was not enough for me to do anything useful with it right but many years later i discovered that there's a language ca..."
Huemer engages in a discussion about what he considers underrated and overrated concepts in philosophy and politics. He shares his insights on various ideas and figures, prompting listeners to reevaluate their perceptions. This segment offers a unique perspective on the landscape of philosophical thought.
"programming language language that i guess nobody uses anymore um but you know it was not enough for me to do anything useful with it right but many years later i discovered that there's a language ca..."
In this segment, Huemer discusses his production function as a philosopher and writer. He reflects on how he balances research, writing, and teaching. This conversation provides valuable insights into the life of an academic and the demands of producing philosophical work.
"opinion and among the philosophers i know of that are living um you seem to have addressed the big questions uh more prolifically creatively and accessibly uh what's the humor production function how ..."
In this segment, Huemer explains his production function, shedding light on how he generates ideas and writes. This insight into his creative process offers valuable lessons for aspiring philosophers and writers.
"opinion and among the philosophers i know of that are living um you seem to have addressed the big questions uh more prolifically creatively and accessibly uh what's the humor production function how ..."
Huemer shares some of his favorite books, discussing their impact on his thinking and philosophy. He reflects on how literature has shaped his views and intellectual journey. This segment highlights the importance of reading in the development of philosophical ideas.
"three favorite books oh uh um let's see it'll be three of my books so that you did not write yourself oh okay books they're not my i don't know um like i would probably have to spend a lot longer to a..."
Huemer shares his favorite books, providing recommendations that reflect his philosophical interests. This segment serves as a resource for listeners looking to expand their reading list with influential works.
"three favorite books oh uh um let's see it'll be three of my books so that you did not write yourself oh okay books they're not my i don't know um like i would probably have to spend a lot longer to a..."
In the final segment, Huemer offers advice for young people navigating their philosophical journeys. He emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, encouraging the next generation of thinkers.
"would you have for a philosophically inclined 20 year old who doesn't want to go into philosophy as an academic discipline but is still interested in philosophy um i don't know like you know my first ..."
In the final segment, Huemer offers advice for young people navigating their philosophical and political beliefs. He emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and questioning authority. This closing discussion serves as an inspiring call to action for the next generation of thinkers.
"would you have for a philosophically inclined 20 year old who doesn't want to go into philosophy as an academic discipline but is still interested in philosophy um i don't know like you know my first ..."