
101 segments available
Dave Smith is a comedian, libertarian, political commentator, and the host of Part of the Problem podcast. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep464-sb See below for timestamps, transcript, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. *Transcript:* https://lexfridman.com/dave-smith-transcript *CONTACT LEX:* *Feedback* - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey *AMA* - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama *Hiring* - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring *Other* - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact *EPISODE LINKS:* Dave's X: https://x.com/ComicDaveSmith Dave's YouTube: https://youtube.com/DSmithcomic Dave's Instagram: https://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmith Dave's Website: https://comicdavesmith.com/ Part of the Problem Podcast: https://partoftheproblem.com/ *SPONSORS:* To support this podcast, check out our sponsors & get discounts: *Call of Duty:* First-person shooter video game. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/call_of_duty-ep464-sb *Tax Network USA:* Full-service tax firm. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/tax_network_usa-ep464-sb *Notion:* Note-taking and team collaboration. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/notion-ep464-sb *Shopify:* Sell stuff online. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/shopify-ep464-sb *BetterHelp:* Online therapy and counseling. Go to https://lexfridman.com/s/betterhelp-ep464-sb *OUTLINE:* 0:00 - Episode highlight 1:26 - Introduction 1:45 - Libertarianism 3:00 - Ron Paul 6:13 - Military–industrial complex 13:06 - War on Terror 25:25 - China and Taiwan 33:13 - Just war theory 40:22 - Israel and Gaza 57:49 - Douglas Murray 1:05:42 - Hamas 1:22:01 - Hitler and Stalin 1:24:15 - Darryl Cooper 1:33:27 - Antisemitism 1:47:00 - World leaders 1:59:34 - Jeffrey Epstein 2:07:37 - Sam Harris 2:20:21 - Ukraine and Russia 2:39:46 - Joe Rogan 2:52:15 - Conspiracy theories 3:10:06 - Hope *PODCAST LINKS:* - Podcast Website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast - Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr - Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 - RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ - Podcast Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 - Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/lexclips *SOCIAL LINKS:* - X: https://x.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://instagram.com/lexfridman - TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://facebook.com/lexfridman - Patreon: https://patreon.com/lexfridman - Telegram: https://t.me/lexfridman - Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/lexfridman
Dave Smith discusses the consequences of the Iraq War, highlighting how the lies that led to the conflict have bankrupted the country and destroyed the dollar. He emphasizes the importance of viewing adversaries as human beings to foster diplomacy and suggests that the current approach to war only exacerbates the issues at hand.
"All the people who sold the war in Iraq they lied us into war after a war. They've bankrupted the country, damn near destroyed the dollar, and like no one loses their job. No one even gets in trouble ..."
In this segment, Dave Smith explains the various branches of libertarianism, including the influences of notable figures like Rand Paul and Milton Friedman. He positions himself within the Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist school and discusses the distinct emphasis on foreign policy that sets Ron Paul's brand apart from mainstream libertarianism.
"everyone talking about the flight logs and the files? Where are the tapes? This guy was clearly taping people to blackmail them. Like, why does anything need to be redacted for national security? Like..."
Dave Smith expresses his admiration for Ron Paul, calling him the greatest living American hero. He highlights Paul's consistent stance on major issues and his integrity, noting how he stood alone in Congress against bipartisan agreements, earning respect for his unwavering commitment to liberty.
"like anything like with left-wing schools of thought or right-wing schools of thought, there's many different camps and different thinkers and so within the kind of broader theme of libertarianism the..."
Smith delves into the core ideas that Ron Paul represents, emphasizing the value of liberty and the dangers of government overreach. He discusses how Paul's critiques of corruption in Washington laid the groundwork for a broader anti-establishment sentiment that resonates today.
"founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson or George Washington. Number one, I mean all of the major issues that he w he was correct in his understanding of them his diagnosis of what caused these problems an..."
Dave Smith reflects on how Ron Paul introduced a new perspective on limited government, advocating for both domestic and foreign policy restraint. He contrasts the traditional views of liberals and conservatives, illustrating how Paul's philosophy provided a coherent alternative.
"No, because well, he was a medical doctor and then he was he would be the lone no vote in Congress like all the time like on on the bills that the entire Congress bipartisan agreement everything is an..."
In this segment, Smith discusses Ron Paul's explanation of terrorism, arguing that the hatred towards the U.S. is rooted in its foreign interventions rather than a disdain for freedom. He critiques the mainstream narrative and emphasizes the need for a more nuanced understanding of global conflicts.
"And he was, you know, you imagine what it must have been like from like the lobbyist perspective when they first tried to go there, you know, and they'd be like, "All right, listen. we really need you..."
Smith elaborates on the consequences of military intervention, citing the increase in anti-American sentiment as a direct result of U.S. actions abroad. He highlights the disconnect between the perceived goals of intervention and the actual outcomes, urging a reevaluation of foreign policy.
"worship or something like that. I do think he's a I think he's a genuinely great man and I think great men are to be revered. Yeah, as you said there's integrity there. Can you speak to the ideas that..."
Dave Smith discusses the cycle of violence perpetuated by military actions, referencing General McChrystal's concept of 'insurgent math.' He argues that each act of violence breeds further resentment and conflict, calling for a fundamental change in how the U.S. engages with the world.
"so there there's a a lot of components to that, but essentially Ron Paul was talking about draining the swamp way before it was like this dominant mass message. And I think Ron Paul in many ways laid ..."
In this poignant segment, Smith reflects on the human cost of war, emphasizing the lives lost and families destroyed as a result of U.S. military actions. He challenges the justification of war by highlighting the suffering it causes, advocating for a more compassionate approach to foreign policy.
"things for me, okay, at the time. So I was like a I was a young man when I first found Ron Paul. I was I was in uh 2007 was when I first saw him and then started obsessively reading all of his books. ..."
Smith discusses the cultural aspects of resistance to U.S. intervention, arguing that many nations do not want foreign values imposed upon them. He critiques the narrative that portrays U.S. actions as benevolent, urging a recognition of the complexities involved in international relations.
"make sense to like what are what is it exactly that like um all the Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush and and even like Milton Friedman and guys like that and Thomas Soul and the it's like you want a c..."
In this segment, Smith addresses the misconceptions surrounding terrorism and the motivations behind it. He argues that understanding the root causes of terrorism is crucial for developing effective policies and preventing further violence.
"oppose that would be the Ron Paul worldview. And then the other thing for me and this was actually this was my introduction to Ron Paul. And this too to me was like kind of a portal in a way. It was i..."
Dave Smith discusses the instinctual human response to violence and conflict, particularly in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict and the War on Terror. He reflects on how the desire for retaliation can lead to a cycle of violence, where one tribe seeks to avenge the loss of its members by attacking another tribe. This segment explores the darker aspects of human nature and the motivations behind military actions.
"this click for me. But it's in a way and I'm not like I'm not a leftist. I'm not an egalitarian. I'm not a cultural relativist. I'm not saying that all cultures are the same or that we all look at the..."
In this segment, Smith elaborates on the role of the military-industrial complex in perpetuating conflict. He argues that the presence of a third party profiting from war complicates the dynamics between conflicting tribes, making de-escalation difficult. Smith highlights how the complex influences public sentiment and drives military interventions, emphasizing the need for awareness of these underlying motivations.
"it's like that's it's in a way when you look at it like that there's something even though it's so dark and tragic there's something almost beautiful about it where you're like, "Oh, we're all caught ..."
Dave Smith critiques the media's influence on public perception of war, particularly in the context of the Gulf War and the narrative surrounding Saddam Hussein. He discusses how the media can create a sense of urgency for military action, often without a genuine threat to national security. This segment examines the historical context of media manipulation and its implications for public support of military interventions.
"was the case that like the New York Times and NBC and CBS and ABC and the Washington Post and the the Associated Press, I guess, they could just move the nation. I mean if they wanted to be like hey t..."
Smith addresses the concept of just wars within libertarian theory, asserting that while there can be justifications for military action, the loss of innocent lives is never morally acceptable. He discusses the complexities of military intervention, using historical examples to illustrate the challenges of justifying war while minimizing civilian casualties. This segment delves into the moral dilemmas faced in wartime decision-making.
"it. Well so to push back a little bit throughout human history there was also a thing you look at the Roman Empire where just the cultural values were different where military conquest was seen as a g..."
In this segment, Smith critiques the American mindset regarding military intervention and empire-building. He compares the situation in Taiwan to personal relationships, arguing that the U.S. should not impose its will on other nations. Smith emphasizes the importance of recognizing the limits of American power and the need for humility in foreign policy, advocating for diplomatic solutions over military action.
"China. More than a little bit. Yeah. But there I can't even see a justification for a just war. What is the long-term benefit to society if you do military intervention? I well I also think this and I..."
Smith discusses the complexities of international relations, particularly regarding China and Taiwan. He highlights the importance of understanding the constraints imposed by reality and the need for diplomatic engagement rather than aggressive posturing. This segment emphasizes the dangers of Cold War thinking and advocates for building partnerships to prevent conflict.
"all the war games that they've run, if we did militarily, even if it doesn't come to nuclear weapons being used, in which case the whole world gets blown up. But even if we go to militarily try to sto..."
In this segment, Smith explains the implications of the One China policy and how it shapes U.S.-China relations. He discusses the challenges of navigating this policy in light of recent statements from U.S. leaders and the potential consequences of miscommunication. Smith emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of international policies to avoid unnecessary escalation.
"military industry. Well, yeah. And and it was totally destructive during the original Cold War, too. um and almost led to nuclear war on a couple of different occasions. But look, I would just say and..."
Smith concludes with a discussion on the right to self-defense in the context of military intervention. He argues that while there can be just wars, the onus is on those advocating for military action to demonstrate its necessity. This segment reflects on the moral complexities of war and the importance of protecting innocent lives while addressing aggression.
"Ukraine a lot and and with the situation in China and Taiwan is that there are um there are constraints placed on us by reality. It's not all just how would you like the world to be? How would you lik..."
Dave Smith discusses the moral implications of killing innocent people in extreme scenarios, emphasizing that while there may be extenuating circumstances, the act itself is never justified. He uses hypothetical situations to illustrate the complexity of moral decisions in warfare, stressing that the burden of proof lies on those who take such actions.
"right to kill innocent people there. That's never morally okay. Now there could be a scenario just like this is true in life in general right like there's lots of things that you don't have the right ..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on World War II, arguing that even in a just war scenario, the loss of innocent lives should be mourned. He critiques the glorification of military actions that result in civilian casualties, advocating for a somber recognition of the human cost of war.
"about all these these wars. you know it's not like um you know, I think that like let's just say like if you could make World War II like you could reduce it down to the simplest caricature of what Wo..."
Smith addresses the argument that civilians can be held responsible for their government's actions, countering this notion with a call for empathy towards innocent victims. He critiques the logic used by extremists to justify targeting civilians, emphasizing the need for moral clarity in discussions about conflict.
"guess essentially I'd say no you don't ever have a right to kill innocent people. It's never self-defense to be killing innocent people. I mean short of like you know some type of scenario where like ..."
Dave Smith analyzes the implications of the October 7th attack by Hamas on Israel, framing it as a reflection of the broader issues surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He discusses the historical context of the occupation and the failures of leadership that contributed to the tragedy.
"is, is it is there no other option than doing it this way? It's like, okay, like October 7th happened. We can all agree this was like a a horrific tragedy um and a you know, an indefensible act of ter..."
In this segment, Smith critiques Benjamin Netanyahu's long-standing policies towards Hamas and the Palestinian territories. He argues that Netanyahu's approach has perpetuated the cycle of violence and failed to address the underlying issues, ultimately leading to tragic outcomes.
"And you see, you know, the um these, you know, teenagers being killed and the people um you know, you see the images of people uh who were who are held hostage for all this time. So, it's like your he..."
Smith discusses the humanitarian implications of Israel's blockade on Gaza, arguing that with control comes responsibility. He emphasizes the need for international aid to reach the Palestinian people and critiques the hypocrisy in allowing funds to Hamas while restricting basic necessities.
"He had this strategy of propping up Hamas for years. And so he had this strategy of propping up Hamas um for a myriad of reasons. Um, but a major part of it was that look man, as long as there's terro..."
In this segment, Smith outlines potential solutions for improving the lives of Palestinians, advocating for infrastructure development and normalization of relations with Israel. He stresses the importance of building a democratic society that represents the Palestinian people.
"after a war or even a couple of years after a war while they're figuring out what we're going to do with them. It's been over 60 years. is the the we're talking about a a one week long war or a day sh..."
Smith expresses a hopeful perspective on the possibility of peace between Israelis and Palestinians. He draws parallels with historical conflicts that have been resolved and emphasizes the need for both sides to make concessions to achieve lasting peace.
"think it's really it's it's a tragedy that the Arabs embraced terrorism. Uh I don't think it's unique to them. And in fact, you know, I think it was the um the Zionist militias who introduced terroris..."
Dave Smith discusses the potential for a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, drawing parallels to Egypt's land-for-peace deal. He emphasizes the need for Israel to reconsider its stance towards Palestinians, suggesting that true peace requires significant concessions and a shift in mindset from both sides.
"been to war since you know and like I do at least try to hold out that like that is you know it's not like Egypt is you're not going to say they don't have an issue with radical Islam in Egypt you kno..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on historical fears surrounding the abolition of slavery, using a Thomas Jefferson quote to illustrate the complexities of letting go of control. He argues that despite the risks, the moral imperative to end oppression must prevail, drawing a connection to the current situation in Israel and Palestine.
"also remember in the hopeful message you send like at any day you can make a deal. That's one of the frustrating things I had with I hosted a debate on Israel. It's like it just felt hopeless and a lo..."
Smith expresses a hopeful perspective on the Israel-Palestine conflict, suggesting that normalization of relations with Saudi Arabia could play a pivotal role in achieving peace. He believes that major players in the region are ready to broker a deal, provided Israel makes necessary concessions.
"Egypt like if the Israelis they're almost like look these are American sock puppets you know for the most part right and So their their thing is that like okay 100% of my population is completely oppo..."
Dave Smith discusses the complexities of Hamas's role in the Israel-Palestine conflict, acknowledging their extremist actions while also critiquing the narrative that centers solely on them. He explores the implications of their governance and the impact of their actions on the broader peace process.
"of their land. And that the whole um a land for people for a people without land was never true. That was just a slogan that made that felt good to avoid what you guys actually did. and the fact that ..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on the reactions to violence in the Israel-Palestine conflict, comparing it to the aftermath of 9/11 in the U.S. He emphasizes the need for empathy towards those living in Gaza, who have experienced prolonged suffering and violence, and critiques the normalization of celebratory responses to violence.
"no question that they have pursued they have they have pursued a path that was just devastating to their own people and there's no question they have not spent the resources they have on their priorit..."
Smith critiques the notion of Israel as a democracy, arguing that the occupation of Palestinian territories undermines democratic principles. He discusses the implications of governance without representation and the ethical dilemmas posed by military actions against civilians.
"mission accomplished banners and flying on jet. I mean, I think all of the I think having Bob Hope specials at the end of the Persian Gulf War was sickening. I just think all of it is like horrific. U..."
In this segment, Smith contrasts the methods of violence used by Hamas and the Israeli government, discussing the ethical implications of state-sanctioned violence versus acts of terrorism. He raises questions about the morality of collateral damage in warfare and the narratives that surround these actions.
"for the prospects of peace. Well, I'd say I get your point. I guess it's an interesting question that I I don't know if any of us know exactly the answer to but I would say that like um you know even ..."
Smith engages in a nuanced discussion about the labels applied to Hamas and Israel, questioning the validity of framing the conflict as a battle between democracy and a 'death cult.' He argues that the realities of governance and violence complicate these narratives, urging for a deeper understanding of the situation.
"there's an aggressive military campaign support for Hamas goes back up. So, I just think that like I'm more hopeful than not that like you could get to a place where like but it it requires like you y..."
Smith delves into the historical context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, discussing the implications of the creation of Israel and the displacement of Palestinians. He critiques the narrative surrounding the establishment of a Jewish state and the ongoing occupation, emphasizing the need for acknowledgment of historical injustices.
"his words were, "The Zionist Project always knew it was going to involve transfer." That was Benny Morris's words. Now, when when Finkelestein was grilling him on this on your podcast, he kind of said..."
In this concluding segment, Smith argues that the long-standing occupation of Palestinian territories has transformed into a form of annexation. He highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by Israel in maintaining control over millions of Palestinians without granting them rights, questioning the legitimacy of calling Israel a democracy under these conditions.
"have voting rights. And I just by any other like reasonable commonly held standard of democracy, we would not call that a democracy. I mean, like, I'm not again, I'm not even saying this to try to be ..."
In this segment, Smith discusses the moral complexities of warfare, particularly regarding civilian casualties. He contrasts the justifications used by governments for collateral damage with the legal implications of murder in domestic settings, arguing that intent matters in assessing the morality of military actions.
"mean look they kill people in a more primitive barbaric way I guess you could say you know there's something a little bit cleaner about like you know when it's done by a government um and it's collate..."
Smith explores the ethical considerations surrounding war, asserting that all war is inherently immoral due to the inevitable loss of innocent lives. He discusses the challenges of defining just wars and the moral obligations of nations engaged in conflict, particularly when civilian lives are at stake.
"bad guy and I want to kill you and you're at home with a a bunch of women and children and I know there's women and children there. Like I know for a fact that if I blow up this building it's going to..."
This segment delves into the responsibilities of leaders during wartime. Smith argues that leaders must be held accountable for their decisions, especially when those decisions lead to civilian casualties. He emphasizes the need for a moral framework that prioritizes the value of every life, regardless of nationality.
"pretty much and then also when you mix in with that the fact that like you know I mean if you go and I'm not taking an opinion on the word genocide. I don't even like to get into that conversation. I ..."
Smith discusses the controversial use of human shields in warfare, particularly in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict. He critiques the justification of civilian deaths due to the actions of militants, arguing that moral obligations should guide military strategies to minimize harm to innocents.
"leadership class. And that even if it is genuine when some people say it, that that's that's kind of not enough to get away from the the fact that it's, you know, when when Tucker was on um Pierce Mor..."
In this segment, Smith compares the legal standards of justice in domestic settings to those applied in international conflicts. He argues that the moral principles governing actions in war should reflect the same ethical standards we uphold in civilian law, emphasizing the need for accountability in military actions.
"murdering civilians. That said on a on a ethical consideration on which kind of ideals ideologies you can build a society after the war. One that even on the surface level states that the value of eve..."
Smith reflects on the complexities of war narratives, particularly how they are shaped by historical events like World War II. He discusses the implications of these narratives on current conflicts, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of history to inform present-day discussions about war and morality.
"the same. So like fine, you could say but the point I'm making is more like I'm just saying how we would think about these things in a domestic setting. We're talking about like morality here. And mor..."
This segment addresses the inherent moral dilemmas of war, with Smith asserting that the loss of innocent lives complicates any justification for military action. He emphasizes the need for a moral compass that transcends national borders and political agendas when evaluating the ethics of warfare.
"accept that excuse. Like, what? Yeah that guy was bad. You still had an obligation to do something else. That was never accept. Now that we may look at things differently in the context of a war, but ..."
Smith discusses the historical perspectives on war, particularly the lessons learned from World War II. He critiques the oversimplification of historical narratives and their use in justifying modern conflicts, advocating for a more comprehensive understanding of history to inform current debates.
"Yeah. I mean, by its very definition it's innocent people dying almost always, right? Like it's it's difficult to pick which is the just war. And even World War II, because of the complexities that yo..."
In this segment, Smith examines the legacy of Winston Churchill and the justifications for war that have emerged from historical narratives. He critiques the tendency to oversimplify complex historical events and the implications this has for contemporary discussions about military intervention and ethics.
"went, you're in a lot of trouble. If you wanted to compare Hitler to Stalin's body count at that time, Stalin was already a genocidal maniac and Hitler had not gone genocidal yet. So there is a weird ..."
Smith shares insights about Daryl Cooper's approach to historical narratives, particularly regarding World War II. He emphasizes the importance of responsible storytelling in history and the need to challenge prevailing narratives that may oversimplify complex events.
"scientifically figured it out. Since you mentioned Daryl Cooper, you're friends with him. Can you tell me about him and tell me about the whole saga about where he got attacked after the the talker in..."
Dave Smith critiques the portrayal of historical figures like Churchill and the oversimplification of World War II narratives. He argues against the notion that appeasement is always wrong and emphasizes the complexity of historical events, suggesting that the lessons drawn from them are often misapplied in contemporary discussions about war and aggression.
"if that's what you are coming into it for. Okay. One thing I want to say is I think calling Daryl Nazi Nazi sympathizer is just wrong and it it does a lot of damage. I think he's he has a lot of value..."
Smith discusses the problematic comparisons made between Hamas and the Nazis, highlighting the differences in power and context. He argues that such comparisons trivialize the historical significance of World War II and can lead to dangerous rhetoric in modern conflicts, particularly in the context of Israel and Palestine.
"go to total war against a civilian population because this one time it was necessary. Like it's and and the idea that Bobby Kennedy said this to me again, somebody who I I really do love and uh admire..."
In this segment, Smith explores the current climate of antisemitism, questioning the motivations behind online hate and the role of outrage culture. He reflects on the challenges of distinguishing between genuine antisemitism and trolling, while also addressing the implications of identity politics on societal discourse.
"unproductive. And yet the only ones who ever have dropped them are us. Yeah. I was arguing with one guy on a podcast uh and he said that he goes, "You can't allow dictators to have nuclear weapons cuz..."
Smith critiques the effects of woke culture on racial identity and grievances, particularly among young white men. He argues that the embrace of identity politics has led to a backlash, where marginalized groups may feel justified in expressing their grievances, potentially leading to further division and conflict.
"then you also see people who will be asking like completely legitimate questions or making completely legitimate points that are called anti-semitic. And then that I think does not help the dynamic at..."
Smith discusses the correlation between rising antisemitism and geopolitical events, particularly Israel's military actions. He emphasizes the need to differentiate between legitimate grievances and harmful rhetoric, suggesting that the narrative surrounding Israel's actions can influence perceptions of Jews globally.
"to like the Putin interview with Tucker I thought his whole 30 minute opening thing was like horrible and it's just like kind of stupid. Especially when you're talking to Tucker Carlson. You know, thi..."
In this segment, Smith shares his personal experiences with criticism of Israel and the backlash he faces for voicing dissent. He reflects on the complexities of discussing Israel-Palestine relations and the challenges posed by extreme viewpoints on both sides, which can hinder productive dialogue.
"That sure is how they get other people to go look at what these Jews are doing in our foreign policy. So, I would I don't know. There's a lot going on. Um I do think I I think racialism of all differe..."
Smith critiques the extremism present in discussions about Israel and Palestine, noting how both sides can inadvertently support the opposition's narrative. He argues that the presence of radical voices complicates the discourse and detracts from meaningful conversations about the conflict.
"and try ideas for size. And if I'm going to be punished severely by these, I'm okay being criticized by but when they're like lowbrain takes that are just lying about me on mass. Like he gets a huge a..."
In this segment, Dave Smith shares his thoughts on the challenges of interviewing world leaders, particularly Benjamin Netanyahu. He expresses regret over the brevity of his previous interview and contemplates the importance of having extended conversations to uncover deeper insights. Smith acknowledges the pressure from public opinion and the potential backlash that comes with such interviews.
"then with the um with the the Jewing post, too, it's just Yeah. It's it just feeds right into the the opposition side of how to caricature, you know? It's like, oh, so their game is they'll smear ever..."
Dave Smith reflects on the psychological toll of public scrutiny and online hate. He discusses how negative comments can affect his thought process and creativity, comparing it to the experience of a comedian feeling uninspired after witnessing poor performances. Smith emphasizes the importance of maintaining focus on one's work despite external pressures and opinions.
"because the reason I'm leaning against doing it is because the very people you're talking about cuz I just don't want them to on either side, pro- Israel, pro, it doesn't really matter. But the chanti..."
In this candid discussion, Dave Smith addresses the personal costs associated with a public career, including the fear of failure in debates and the responsibility to present well-researched arguments. He acknowledges the risks involved in engaging with controversial figures and the potential consequences of public perception, while also expressing a sense of obligation to challenge himself through debates.
"of this. Like it's just and I just like I just kind of made a decision at a certain point that it's like I'm just going to accept that that's the price of business here. That's what it costs and then ..."
Dave Smith and Lex Fridman explore the unique dynamics of long-form podcasting, where guests can reveal more of their true selves. Smith argues that extended conversations allow for deeper understanding and humanization of complex figures, contrasting it with the superficiality of traditional media formats. He expresses excitement about the potential insights that could emerge from interviewing leaders like Netanyahu and Putin.
"price. And so I just from my perspective I'm like, "Yeah, but how could you turn down getting three hours with Netanyahu?" Like that would just be so interesting. And I'm not even saying you know, lik..."
In this segment, Dave Smith discusses the complexities of interviewing controversial figures, particularly in the context of ongoing conflicts. He acknowledges the difficulty of navigating sensitive topics while maintaining a respectful dialogue. Smith emphasizes the importance of balancing critical questioning with the need to allow guests to express themselves authentically.
"leader is a very specific thing and people don't understand that. For example, you and I can mouth off. We can be super supportive of Netanyahu is super critical in a way that you can't do in front of..."
Dave Smith shares his perspective on the responsibilities that come with public debate and the pressure to perform well. He reflects on the potential consequences of losing a debate and how it could impact his career. Smith expresses a sense of obligation to engage in debates to test his ideas and strengthen his arguments.
"probably all had things like certain type of ventures in life where you're like, all right, no, I don't want to do that. But then you have to have a moment and be like, why is it you don't want to? Oh..."
In this engaging conversation, Dave Smith likens the adrenaline rush of stand-up comedy to the risks involved in public debates. He discusses the excitement of challenging himself and the importance of being prepared for potential backlash. Smith emphasizes the value of taking risks in his career while acknowledging the stakes involved.
"a good idea cuz I don't know I that's the cool thing about the things we do. You've been through a lot of battles. You you've walked into a lot of tough debates and it's like you don't know this could..."
Dave Smith and Lex Fridman delve into the philosophical implications of transhumanism and the desire for eternal life. Smith expresses skepticism about the pursuit of immortality, arguing that the finite nature of life adds value to human experiences. They discuss the balance between extending life and maintaining the natural cycle of life and death.
"myself against someone being like, "No it's not like that." and then you know like showing that I think I can stand up to these these kind of challenges. So I feel like I'm kind of obligated, but then..."
In this segment, Dave Smith addresses the controversial figure of Jeffrey Epstein and the implications of his connections to powerful individuals. He reflects on the public's desire for transparency regarding Epstein's ties to intelligence agencies and the broader implications of his actions. Smith emphasizes the need for accountability and the dangers of unchecked power.
"you. I think there's supposed to be an expiration date on it. I think we're supposed to we're supposed to um there's something about like uh scarcity being a necessary component in a lot of different ..."
Dave Smith discusses the shocking revelations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to powerful figures and the implications of a potential pedophile ring involving high-profile individuals. He highlights the corruption and cover-ups that allowed such a heinous operation to persist, questioning the integrity of institutions that failed to act against it.
"rogue elements within those organizations like this is not necessarily coming from the director or or what you know I I don't know but you look at the guy the way his his career trajectory tracks is l..."
In this segment, Smith critiques the media's complicity in suppressing the Epstein story, emphasizing the moral obligation of journalists to expose the truth. He reflects on the lack of resignations from those who chose to ignore the evidence of a child trafficking ring involving influential figures, raising questions about accountability in journalism.
"I mean like the there's a blackmail operation that relies on raping American children and and like if this is uh you know whether it's CIA or MSAD doesn't make one less you know it's equally horrible ..."
Dave Smith delves into the suspicious circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death while in custody. He questions the narrative of suicide and the failure of security measures, suggesting a deeper conspiracy at play. This segment highlights the broader implications of Epstein's case on trust in institutions and the justice system.
"apparatus that we did not see at the very least see mass resignations over this. Forget even like at the very least expect that it would have been prosecuted and shut down. And then, you know, still t..."
Smith discusses the erosion of trust in institutions, particularly in light of the Epstein case. He contrasts the need for institutional trust with the reality of corruption and cover-ups, arguing that transparency is essential for restoring faith in these entities. This segment raises critical questions about the future of governance and accountability.
"getting around the the huge indictment it is of this entire like everything. And I I mean, even the the fact that even the Trump administration when Pam Bondi goes, "We're going to release all of this..."
In this thought-provoking segment, Dave Smith speculates on the involvement of intelligence agencies in the Epstein scandal. He discusses the implications of such connections and the potential for manipulation within powerful circles. This exploration of intelligence's role in societal issues underscores the complexity of trust and governance.
"these institutions. I'm the same actually. I believe in institutions like I I think they have val so this is where you and I probably disagree on the libertarian side I think it's I think institutions..."
Smith reflects on the changing landscape of media and the rise of alternative platforms. He discusses how these platforms provide a voice for perspectives often ignored by mainstream media, emphasizing the importance of diverse narratives in understanding global events. This segment highlights the shift in how information is disseminated and consumed.
"lot of this stuff with with so much of this too, it's just laziness and people searching for confirmation bias and people searching for a simpler story because that's easier. So if you're if they beli..."
In this segment, Dave Smith argues for the importance of diplomacy over military intervention in global conflicts. He uses recent examples to illustrate the potential for peaceful resolutions and critiques the tendency to view adversaries as purely evil. This discussion emphasizes the need for humanizing perspectives in international relations.
"they're like they're they're human beings. And I think a lot of them as human beings are exhausted by journalists by shitty journalists I should say that and it's hard for them to know which is the go..."
Smith discusses the evolving global perception of Israel, particularly among younger generations. He highlights the impact of recent conflicts on public opinion and the challenges Israel faces in the digital age. This segment underscores the significance of narrative control in shaping international relations.
"all the talks of banning Tik Tok increased and stuff. So for him, say like when he did the Tucker interview or if he does an interview with you, well that's a way for him to do an endound and allow hi..."
In this insightful segment, Dave Smith emphasizes the importance of understanding the human aspects of global conflicts. He critiques the oversimplified narratives that portray enemies as monsters, advocating for a more nuanced approach to international relations. This discussion encourages empathy and dialogue in addressing complex geopolitical issues.
"this war. And you know, I'm sure to some degree at least Netanyahu is like feels like he has to try to get his perspective into that internet conversation area. And so I think a lot of different peopl..."
Smith explores potential pathways to peace in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, contrasting different political approaches. He advocates for diplomatic solutions over military escalation, emphasizing the need for dialogue and understanding in resolving international disputes. This segment highlights the urgency of finding peaceful resolutions in a volatile geopolitical landscape.
"you know, whatever. Even when they were going um before they did the uh Obama and Hillary Clinton did the regime change war in Libya, it was like all this propaganda. They're like, he's buying up Viag..."
Smith contrasts Donald Trump's approach to peace in Ukraine with that of Joe Biden, arguing that Trump's methods are more favorable. He critiques the idea of security guarantees and discusses the implications of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts, highlighting the lack of political will for war among the American public.
"solution here. And so there's just like a lot and and the problem is when you don't like if you make everybody monsters and they're not human beings, well, you can't do diplomacy with monsters. You ca..."
In this segment, Smith asserts that Vladimir Putin has shown a willingness to negotiate throughout the Ukraine conflict. He references NATO's refusal to consider Putin's proposals and discusses the missed opportunities for peace that could have saved lives, emphasizing the need for understanding the motivations behind the conflict.
"puts Donald Trump and and I don't think everything he's done has been perfect um and I really did not like that mineral uh deal that he was floating out for a while there and I I think maybe that migh..."
Smith critiques the notion of security guarantees for Ukraine, questioning the U.S.'s obligation to intervene in foreign conflicts. He argues that such commitments could lead to perpetual warfare and emphasizes the importance of recognizing the limits of American involvement in global affairs.
"fought. And also like there's simply we're in this weird position where America postures like they're so tough but really when it comes down to it we're not going to war in Ukraine. There's no politic..."
Smith discusses the responsibility for the Ukraine invasion, placing the blame on Putin while acknowledging the role of Western foreign policy in escalating tensions. He draws parallels to historical conflicts and emphasizes the need for a consistent moral standard in evaluating the justification for war.
"throughout the war. And there's been a lot of solid reporting on this. And I mean the sources on it are pretty impeccable. The the head of NATO Stlenberg, I always mess up his name but he literally sa..."
In this segment, Smith reflects on the historical context of NATO expansion and its implications for U.S.-Russia relations. He cites George Kennan's warnings about the dangers of NATO's eastward expansion and discusses how these decisions have contributed to the current conflict.
"So, I do think I think uh also the Joe Biden's CIA director who was a CI CIA director's whole four years uh uh William Burns uh when he was ambassador to Russia, he wrote the net means net and in the ..."
Smith expresses hope for a swift resolution to the Ukraine conflict, highlighting Trump's political incentives to achieve peace. He acknowledges the complexities of the situation but emphasizes the need for urgency in ending the war to prevent further loss of life.
"he did it seemed like he I'm not defending the decision. I'm just saying it seemed like he reluctantly uh debate, you know, what was it in 2014 or 15 when they had the plebites in Crimea and in the Do..."
Smith reflects on the tragic reality of war, particularly when it continues even after a resolution is apparent. He discusses the emotional toll of ongoing violence and the moral implications of prolonging conflict when a peaceful solution is within reach.
"security guarantee in the future. I think the problem with that is just again like I don't mean to be cruel about this because like it sucks that there's little countries that are next to big countrie..."
Smith contrasts America's experience with war to that of neighboring countries, emphasizing the unique challenges faced by nations in direct conflict. He discusses the psychological impact of war when it occurs on one's borders and the complexities of military engagement in such scenarios.
"that we left unsaid uh that's important to say is that Putin invaded Ukraine in uh February 24th 2022. And I think he is, at least from my perspective, the person who started the war. You could talk a..."
In this segment, Smith elaborates on the stakes involved in conflicts between neighboring countries, highlighting the survival instincts that drive nations to engage in warfare. He discusses the challenges of occupying and controlling territories and the realities of modern warfare.
"right. You know, my my friend Scott Horton, who I was talking to you about um, who just totally brilliant guy, even in his book, there's a whole chapter of all the other options of what Vladimir Putin..."
Smith critiques U.S. foreign policy decisions over the decades, linking them to the current conflict in Ukraine. He discusses the historical context of military interventions and the implications of past actions on present-day geopolitics, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation of strategies.
"happened. And listen, it may be right or it may be wrong. Um, but if China or Russia ever like backed a street push to overthrow the democratically elected government in Mexico and then install a pro-..."
Dave Smith discusses the stark differences between wars fought on foreign soil and conflicts occurring between neighboring countries, like the ongoing war in Ukraine. He emphasizes the unique psychological impact of having war at your doorstep, contrasting it with America's historical detachment from direct conflict. Smith reflects on the trauma experienced by both Russia and Ukraine throughout the 20th century, highlighting how these historical events shape current perceptions and realities of war.
"uh with whoever the future president is. You'll be the only guy who's interviewed both of them, I think. Yeah. During this war, right? And I have to say the border crossing is getting increasingly mor..."
In this segment, Dave Smith shares insights from his podcast, 'Part of the Problem,' discussing the unique relationship he builds with his audience. He reflects on how podcasting creates a sense of familiarity and connection, allowing listeners to feel as if they know him personally. Smith explores the dynamics of audience engagement and the importance of authenticity in maintaining a genuine relationship with listeners.
"Plus a history in both nations of super sophisticated and expansive intelligence agencies. Right. Right. Right. Yeah that's a very good point. Yeah. You host a podcast called Part of the Problem. Yes...."
Dave Smith expresses his deep admiration for Joe Rogan, highlighting the significant impact Rogan has had on his life and career. He recounts his journey as a fan of Rogan's work and how their friendship has evolved. Smith appreciates Rogan's genuine nature and his willingness to support and uplift others in the comedy community, emphasizing the importance of mentorship and friendship in the industry.
"like kind of the thing that made comedians big. The things before that used to be like uh Letterman and Leno and Conan like comedians would get like a seven minute set on there and even if you do grea..."
In this segment, Dave Smith discusses the fearless approach Joe Rogan takes in his conversations and interviews. He admires Rogan's ability to engage with controversial topics without fear of backlash, noting how this quality sets him apart from traditional journalists. Smith reflects on the importance of being genuine and unguarded in discussions, especially when addressing sensitive subjects.
"like that. So like I always really admired him and I was always a huge fan of his. And then he literally not only did he like change my life, but he changed like all of my friends lives. Like it's lik..."
Dave Smith delves into the complexities of conspiracy theories, discussing the importance of critical thinking and careful analysis. He critiques the tendency of some conspiracy theorists to jump to conclusions without solid evidence, using historical examples to illustrate his point. Smith emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to questioning narratives while avoiding the pitfalls of sloppy reasoning.
"become more scared cuz they like the comfort of just like normal life cuz when you're taking risks, you're going to pay for it. Even if you have money not just financially, just like it's going to it'..."
In this segment, Dave Smith addresses popular conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11, particularly the claim that Israel was involved. He encourages skepticism and critical analysis of the evidence presented by conspiracy theorists, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between compelling narratives and actual proof.
"there's just a lot of things like that. There's a lot of things I even see like because it's a very popular conspiracy theory online now that um that Israel did 9/11. And I'm like, uh, I'm open. You k..."
Dave Smith reflects on the psychological tendency for people to gravitate towards dogmatic certainty in beliefs. He contrasts this with his own approach of maintaining humility and openness to multiple perspectives, discussing how this can be perceived as a weakness in a society that values confident assertions.
"some sometimes the the constant conspiracy guys, not always, but sometimes they just get sloppy when it comes to actually analyzing how strong the case is. I mean, there's several psychological effect..."
Smith critiques the lack of accountability for political leaders and institutions following major failures, such as the Iraq War and the COVID-19 pandemic. He argues that the absence of repercussions for catastrophic decisions erodes public trust in government and media, and he expresses hope for a future where accountability is prioritized.
"you kind of have to be certain about things. But then there there's a real problem with that, which is that a lot of times you're just bullshitting or you're just or you're or you're not right. You're..."
In a hopeful discussion, Dave Smith shares insights from economist Jean Ebstein about the potential for radical societal change. He reflects on historical examples, such as the abolition of slavery and the fall of the Soviet Union, to illustrate that significant progress can occur unexpectedly, even in seemingly dire circumstances.
"American people just wouldn't put up with it anymore. And this is why trust in every institution and the corporate media and the Congress and all of it has evaporated is that it's like he's just sayin..."
Smith discusses the evolving landscape of political communication, emphasizing the importance of authenticity in candidates. He contrasts the current demand for long-form, genuine discourse with past political strategies, suggesting that future leaders must connect with voters on a deeper level to succeed.
"transparency, more like authenticity. I think also the Democratic party has learned the lesson of like you have to have candidates that do I I don't give a shit about podcast, but do podcast like thin..."
In this segment, Dave Smith reflects on the qualities of effective political leaders, highlighting the need for authenticity and the ability to engage in meaningful dialogue. He critiques traditional political figures for their lack of genuine connection with the electorate and suggests that future candidates must adapt to this new expectation.
"think is long-term a real positive development, you know, like you you just kind of know going forward the Democrats, right, which I think is kind of what you were saying, right? You can't run a Camal..."
Dave Smith analyzes the current state of the Democratic Party, acknowledging its challenges while expressing optimism for potential reform. He discusses the possibility of a new leader emerging who can resonate with the electorate and bring about meaningful change, drawing parallels to past political shifts.
"makes you actually a better person. I I ultimately think that Barack Obama was a fascinating human being. And there was a choice made early on to be more to do like less interviews, be more behind the..."
Smith explores the idea that the Democratic Party is ripe for disruption, similar to what Donald Trump achieved within the Republican Party. He emphasizes the need for a candidate who can break free from traditional party constraints and connect with voters on pressing issues.
"They're a mess like I've never seen a political party before. But that in itself is is I think a very good thing. And what comes from here is there's a lot of possibilities now. And you know there's n..."
In this concluding segment, Dave Smith underscores the value of authentic voices in politics, using John Stewart as an example of someone who speaks truthfully and courageously. He argues that the public's desire for genuine representation is stronger than ever, and that future leaders must embody this authenticity to gain trust.
"to the Democrats. But the thing is, it would have to be somebody outside of the three-letter agency control cuz that's what everyone's rejecting right now. But if you were to actually sit there and go..."
Dave Smith shares a powerful perspective on radical optimism by reflecting on historical events like the abolition of slavery and the fall of the Soviet Union. He emphasizes how societal changes that once seemed impossible can occur in a short time, encouraging listeners to maintain hope for the future despite current challenges.
"and he told me this once and I just always loved it and he so I call it Ebstein's Ebstein's case not that Eb different Ebstein Jean Ebstein no relation I want to be clear on that okay this is Jean's l..."
In this segment, Dave discusses the evolving dynamics of information control and propaganda in modern society. He reflects on his past fears during the COVID-19 pandemic about censorship and the suppression of alternative voices, ultimately expressing optimism about the current state of discourse and the loss of monopoly on propaganda by traditional regimes.
"neocons because when he was trying to have daunt with Russia the neocons were in the press being like he just guaranteed another hundred years of Soviet dominance you know and if someone had just been..."
Dave Smith highlights the significance of alternative media voices in today's political landscape. He contrasts the past, where mainstream media could easily sway public opinion, with the current environment where influential figures like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson challenge narratives, suggesting a shift towards a more open and diverse discourse.
"remember so vividly 2002 and and 2002 now you know 911 happened in late 200 1. We invaded Iraq in 2003, but all of 2002 was a massive propaganda campaign just constantly laying down the blueprints for..."
Dave expresses his hope for the future through advancements in technology and medicine. He shares a personal story about his son's successful heart surgery, illustrating how medical innovations have transformed lives. This segment underscores the miracles of modern medicine and the potential for continued progress in human history.
"a place now where we have this world of possibilities that that would have seemed impossible just so recently. And so just thinking like all of that rambling stew, whatever all that was that leaves me..."