
7 segments available
Full episode with Nick Bostrom (Mar 2020): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfKiTGj-zeQ Clips channel (Lex Clips): https://www.youtube.com/lexclips Main channel (Lex Fridman): https://www.youtube.com/lexfridman (more links below) Podcast full episodes playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 Podcasts clips playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOeciFP3CBCIEElOJeitOr41 Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/ai Podcast on Apple Podcasts (iTunes): https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Podcast on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 Podcast RSS: https://lexfridman.com/category/ai/feed/ Nick Bostrom is a philosopher at University of Oxford and the director of the Future of Humanity Institute. He has worked on fascinating and important ideas in existential risks, simulation hypothesis, human enhancement ethics, and the risks of superintelligent AI systems, including in his book Superintelligence. I can see talking to Nick multiple times on this podcast, many hours each time, but we have to start somewhere. Subscribe to this YouTube channel or connect on: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman - Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman
Nick Bostrom introduces Robert Nozick's thought experiment known as the Experience Machine, which posits a hypothetical machine that can provide any experience one desires. He discusses the implications of choosing to enter such a machine, emphasizing that while it could fulfill one's dreams, many people would likely reject it for a permanent escape from reality, suggesting that our values are tied to more than just experiences.
"meaning philosophy there's this experience machine thought experiment have you come across this so Robert Nozick had this thought experiment where you imagine some crazy super-duper neuroscientist of ..."
Bostrom explores the idea that life’s ups and downs contribute to what we value, questioning whether the experience machine can replicate genuine human connections. He argues that while one could have simulated experiences of joy, they would lack real relationships and meaningful impacts on history, which many people might prioritize over mere happiness.
"so therefore what we value depends on other things than what we experience so ok can you can you take that argument further what about the fact that maybe what we values the up and down of life so you..."
Bostrom discusses the status quo effect in relation to the Experience Machine, suggesting that people may prefer their current reality over an unknown alternative. He raises the question of whether individuals would choose to leave their familiar lives for an uncertain existence, highlighting the importance of self-identity and ongoing projects in shaping our values.
"for me is one where I have a big positive impact on history unfolds so let's see if you could kind of explore these different possible explanations for why this you wouldn't want to go into the experi..."
Bostrom reflects on the willingness to embrace a new life, such as becoming a farmer in Peru, especially as virtual reality technology advances. He contrasts this with the experience machine, emphasizing the distinction between real life and simulated experiences, and how the familiarity of one's current life can influence decisions about entering a simulated existence.
"the that they were actually in the experience machine howling a lot of people might prefer to live the life that they are familiar with rather than sort of bail out into something the change itself th..."
In this segment, Bostrom delves into the complexities of defining what is real versus what is an illusion. He discusses the implications of being in a simulation versus actual experiences, questioning how one can prove the reality of their existence when faced with advanced simulations that feel real.
"this in this thought experiment just to make sure we are understand so in this case that the farmer in Peru would not be a virtual reality that would be the real the real there is a real that your lif..."
Bostrom examines the potential for consciousness within the Experience Machine, discussing how interactions with simulated beings could lead to the creation of conscious entities. He raises ethical questions about the implications of creating realistic simulations and the responsibilities that come with them.
"peanuts grown well but what makes a peanut so so peanut could be grown and you could feed things with that peanut and why can't all of that be done in a simulation I hope first of all that they actual..."
In this concluding segment, Bostrom elaborates on the nature of interactions within the Experience Machine, questioning whether it is possible to create a simulation that allows for genuine consciousness. He discusses the challenges of distinguishing between real and simulated interactions, emphasizing the importance of depth in relationships and the potential consequences of creating conscious simulations.
"experience machine and that like at a certain point you know if there's a person waiting for you inside that experience machine maybe your newly found wife and she dies she has fear she has hopes and ..."