
55 segments available
Stephen Kotkin is arguably the world’s foremost expert on Joseph Stalin and has written a massive 2-volume biography about him (with a 3rd volume in the works). No other individual had more of a profound impact on the 20th century than Stalin. He held the power of life and death over every single person across 11 time zones, and he killed tens of millions of people, utterly consumed by an ideology aimed at building paradise on Earth. And he was one half of the biggest and most consequential military confrontation in history (even if Hitler didn’t prove to be his match). Read the transcript: https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/stephen-kotkin Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dwarkesh-podcast/id1516093381?i=1000716709877 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0Wb7GWB1DmmO8Jw3ILPavW?si=2bcf0bfa96b442ba ---------------------------------------- SPONSORS * Lighthouse is THE fastest immigration solution for the technology industry. All they need is your resume or LinkedIn profile to tell you which visas you’re most eligible for, and they’ll send you this eligibility document for free, no commitment required. Get started today at https://www.lighthousehq.com/ref/Dwarkesh. To sponsor a future episode, visit https://dwarkesh.com/advertise ---------------------------------------- TIMESTAMPS 00:00:00 – Was the tsarist regime the lesser of 2 evils? 00:24:38 – The peasants brought Lenin to power, then he enslaved them 00:38:31 – Why did so many go along with enforced famine and the Great Terror? 01:03:19 – Today's leftist civil war 01:13:54 – Doesn’t CCP deserve credit for China's growth? 01:36:06 – Why didn't somebody just kill Stalin? 01:53:38 – Overcoming the pathologies of communism with tech: USSR vs China
Stephen Kotkin discusses the repressive nature of the tsarist regime in Russia, comparing it to modern standards and other historical regimes. He emphasizes the need for the tsarist regime to modernize its military and industry while suppressing political dissent among workers and intellectuals, highlighting the fundamental dilemma of autocratic governance.
"My guest today is Stephen Kotkin, who is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and author of two-thirds of his three-volume Stalin biographies. The first one, Stalin: Paradoxes of Power. The s..."
Kotkin elaborates on the geopolitical necessity of modernization for the tsarist regime, explaining how the need for military and industrial advancement conflicted with the regime's desire to maintain autocratic control. He draws parallels to contemporary authoritarian regimes that face similar challenges.
"It needs to be able to compete in the international system. That means it needs a modern military and modern industry to underwrite that modern military. So it needs armaments, it needs steel, it ..."
In this segment, Kotkin explores the paradox of the tsarist regime's repression of the very classes it needed for modernization. He discusses how this dynamic of repression against workers and intellectuals is a recurring theme in authoritarian regimes, affecting their ability to compete globally.
"That's a problem we still have today. The Iranian regime now has that problem. The Chinese regime in Beijing has this problem. The Soviet Union had that problem. Contemporary Russia has that proble..."
Kotkin reflects on historical lessons regarding the choice between autocratic regimes and revolutionary movements. He questions whether cooperating with a lesser evil, such as the tsarist regime, could have led to a more stable political order, drawing on examples from Russia and Germany.
"Do you think that that still applies in today's world? Yes, there are pockets of conflict in the Middle East or in Ukraine, which would motivate the key powers there to want to have modern milit..."
This segment delves into Stalin's early life and his dedication to fighting the injustices of the tsarist regime. Kotkin discusses how Stalin's revolutionary methods ultimately led to a regime that was more unjust than the one he opposed, illustrating the concept of perverse and unintended consequences in revolutionary movements.
"while importing as much as they can of the attributes… It's two sides of the same coin. The thing that gets you the engineers also gets you the possible political ideas. So the tsarist regime begi..."
Kotkin examines the failure of constitutional revolutions in early 20th-century Russia and other nations. He discusses how the lack of a stable political order led to chaos and the rise of more radical leftist movements, contrasting this with successful transitions in other countries.
"It's totally unjust and the claims of the people protesting are legitimate. Stalin goes into the underground, not because he's looking for power. It's because he's dedicated to fighting the injus..."
In this segment, Kotkin highlights the paradox of revolutionary change during the mass age, where attempts to establish constitutional order often resulted in leftist revolutions that undermined future prosperity. He discusses the implications of this dynamic for contemporary political systems.
"some solution that was more evolutionary that could get you to a better place. The constitutionalists, otherwise known as the Kadets, we would call them the classical liberals. They're the private..."
Kotkin addresses the challenges faced by autocratic regimes in implementing necessary reforms while maintaining control. He discusses historical examples and the complexities of balancing modernization with political stability, emphasizing the lessons learned from past failures.
"before the modern era. Why? Because when you institute constitutional order, like in England, in the US, to a certain extent in France which has a more complicated process, you do it before you'..."
In this concluding segment, Kotkin reflects on the tsarist regime's approach to modernization and its refusal to embrace evolutionary political processes. He discusses the implications of this refusal for Russia's historical trajectory and the broader lessons for contemporary governance.
"The opposite has happened in most other cases where you've gotten an attempt but a failure to introduce enduring constitutional order in a mass society. But there's a paradox here. If you institu..."
Stephen Kotkin discusses the complexities of political overthrow in the context of the Tsarist regime and the rise of radical movements. He explores how both leftist and rightist factions used the threat of each other to consolidate power, leading to a unique historical paradox where socialism triumphed in Russia while fascism rose in Germany. This segment delves into the historical dynamics that shaped these outcomes and the implications for political participation.
"repressed the political movement, the Tsar wanted to undo those concessions and go back to being an autocrat. An autocrat, autokrator, means a "self-power, a power unto itself". So this is your ..."
Kotkin examines the critical role of peasant land hunger in the Russian Revolution of 1917. He explains how the failure to adequately address land distribution led to radicalism among peasants, who sought to seize land from the aristocracy. This segment highlights the socio-political instability caused by inadequate land reforms and how it fueled the Bolshevik rise to power, contrasting it with the German experience.
"You say that in 1917 a leftist revolution of some kind was inevitable, but that it didn't have to be the Bolshevik October Revolution. Why was leftism inevitable in Russia? You put your finger on ..."
In this segment, Kotkin discusses the irony of the peasant revolutions in Russia and China, where the quest for land ownership led to the rise of oppressive regimes. He details how the Bolsheviks initially benefited from peasant radicalism, only to later reverse their gains through violent collectivization. This exploration reveals the unintended consequences of revolutionary movements and the cyclical nature of oppression.
"resolved right through 1917, 1918. So the peasants had their own revolution in 1917 and 1918, which was not about the socialist parties. It's not about the Bolsheviks, it's not about Lenin, it's ..."
Kotkin analyzes the significance of peasantry in shaping political outcomes across different nations. He contrasts the stability of peasant societies in Central Europe with the radicalism in Russia and China, emphasizing how land distribution affects political allegiance and order. This segment underscores the importance of integrating peasant interests into political systems to prevent radical upheaval.
"In central Europe—the southern German case, the northern Italian case, the Hungarian case—you don't have the endurance of the leftists in power. They're all thrown out. They're thrown out by the..."
This segment delves into the evolution of repressive mechanisms in Tsarist Russia compared to Stalin's regime. Kotkin explains how the secret police transformed from a small surveillance entity to a massive repressive apparatus capable of enforcing state control over the peasantry. He discusses the implications of this shift for the nature of governance and societal repression.
"unrest is caused by the mistreatment of peasants in China and in Russia, you have the mistreatment of them to an extent unimaginable after the collectivization in 1928 where literally 100 millio..."
Kotkin explores the psychological and ideological underpinnings of the sadism exhibited by Stalin's regime. He discusses how ideology motivated individuals within the system to commit acts of brutality, believing they were contributing to a greater cause. This segment provides insight into the mindset of those who participated in the regime's atrocities and the role of youthful fervor in shaping their actions.
"surveillance and infiltration. You're reading their mail, which is something that's invented in France. The black cabinets are a French invention that the tsar's secret police borrow. You're follo..."
In this concluding segment, Kotkin reflects on the complexities of ideological beliefs and their impact on political actions. He draws parallels between historical ideologies and contemporary political beliefs, illustrating how individuals can hold onto flawed ideas despite empirical evidence. This discussion emphasizes the enduring power of ideology in shaping human behavior and political landscapes.
"Again, a fantastic question. We get this from Lev Kopelev, The Education of a True Believer. He was one of these people. He later then becomes a dissident. He gets forced into exile in Germany. He'..."
This segment addresses the conflict between personal beliefs and loyalty to the Communist Party during Stalin's regime. Kotkin highlights how party discipline often superseded individual understanding of socialism, leading to complicity in the regime's actions. He reflects on historical figures like Trotsky and Khrushchev, illustrating the tension between ideological commitment and moral integrity.
"There's ideology, but there's a very specific thing to these Marxist regimes. They might believe in class conflict and that you need this revolution and so forth. But there's also this sense that ..."
Kotkin discusses the psychological complexities of individuals within Marxist regimes, emphasizing the coexistence of belief, cynicism, and self-preservation. He examines why some individuals did not resist Stalin's purges despite their awareness of the regime's brutality, shedding light on the intricate motivations that drive human behavior in oppressive systems.
"of socialism, is absolutely paramount. One way to explain that is that they were just genuinely afraid of Stalin and they thought this was antithetical to their understanding of communism. Anothe..."
In this segment, Kotkin analyzes the resilience of Stalin's regime despite its internal contradictions and purges. He contrasts Stalin's approach with Hitler's, noting how Stalin's terror targeted both enemies and loyalists. This discussion reveals the paradox of a system that could sustain itself while simultaneously undermining its own support base.
"party is dedicated to achieving. You know that there are going to be mistakes and costs and bad things will happen along the way, but is imperialist war better than that? No, the answer is imperia..."
Kotkin articulates the fundamental belief in creating a new world that motivated Stalin and his followers. He discusses the ideological underpinnings of Marxism-Leninism and its promise of a utopian future, despite the historical bloodshed it caused. This segment emphasizes the allure of revolutionary ideology and its impact on the psyche of its adherents.
"They don't have to submit to elections. They don't have to have a mandate. They don't have to legitimate their rule beyond the ideological building of a new world, of overcoming injustice. What we..."
In this segment, Kotkin examines the dichotomy of belief within totalitarian regimes, focusing on how individuals reconcile their ideological commitments with the brutal realities of their actions. He discusses the historical context of socialism and the challenges faced by those who sought to implement its principles, revealing the complexities of loyalty and belief in oppressive systems.
"so that… You could never do this in the private sector. Nobody could afford you this kind of power in the private sector and in a decentralized political system, in a federalized political system..."
Kotkin highlights the rare instances of individuals who dared to criticize the regime during Stalin's rule. He reflects on the courage required to oppose the dictatorship and the consequences faced by those who spoke out against the failures of the system. This segment underscores the importance of dissent in the face of tyranny and the moral dilemmas faced by those within the regime.
"socialism and the building of Marxism-Leninism." So people did believe that Stalin was actually going against this end goal that they had. At least Khrushchev believed that. In many cases, they t..."
In this segment, Kotkin discusses the inherent violence of class struggle as envisioned by Marxist ideology. He explains how the eradication of the bourgeoisie was seen as necessary for the establishment of a new world order, and the resulting paranoia that led to widespread purges. This analysis provides insight into the mindset of those who believed in the righteousness of their cause.
"The ones who publicly decry the failures of the system and its perverse and unintended consequences, the ones who decry the dictatorship as opposed to the freedom that Marx predicted would happe..."
Kotkin explores the paradox of loyalty within Stalin's regime, where individuals often betrayed their comrades out of fear for their own safety. He discusses the psychological mechanisms that led to self-preservation at the expense of others, revealing the moral complexities faced by those navigating a totalitarian landscape.
"Human psychology is a complex subject. Figuring out human psychology is a big challenge, even with everything we know now, let alone what we knew then. So it's simultaneously everything and anythi..."
In this segment, Kotkin delves into the ideological foundations of socialism as understood by Marxist-Leninists. He discusses the historical trajectory from feudalism to capitalism to socialism, and the misconceptions surrounding the implementation of socialist principles. This analysis highlights the challenges faced by revolutionary movements and the ideological battles that continue to shape political discourse.
"One of the things they do is to walk through the fire of their self-immolation on behalf of the cause. This belief in the new world, in the better world, in transcending capitalism, in getting p..."
Kotkin outlines the ongoing civil war within leftist movements, contrasting revolutionary ideologies with reformist approaches. He discusses the historical context of this divide and its implications for contemporary politics, emphasizing the struggle between those who seek to eradicate capitalism and those who advocate for reform within the existing system.
"Socialism means many different things. A communist party is building socialism. Why? Because their view of the world is: feudalism, capitalism, socialism, communism. First they have to destroy ca..."
Kotkin delves into the historical context of socialist movements, focusing on figures like Eduard Bernstein who advocated for a revisionist approach to socialism. He explains how this perspective accepts capitalism and seeks to reform it rather than destroy it, leading to a significant split within the socialist movement. This segment underscores the tension between revolutionary ideals and practical governance.
"and prosperity, in order to have freedom. We need to manage it better, redistribute. This civil war on the left, which arises in real time, the critics of Lenin's revolution, the German Social De..."
In this thought-provoking segment, Kotkin examines the paradoxical nature of communism, where failures often reinforce the belief in the system rather than discredit it. He discusses how leaders like Khrushchev and Xi Jinping acknowledge past horrors but maintain the system, illustrating a persistent faith in communism despite its historical failures. This segment reveals the complexities of ideological loyalty in the face of evidence.
"You have this deep and fundamental problem for the left. The tragedy of the left that it's never able to overcome, even to this day, where it comes out and says, "No more anti-capitalism ever, th..."
Kotkin analyzes Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin's crimes and its impact on the Soviet system. He argues that while the horrors of Stalinism were acknowledged, the fundamental structure of the communist regime remained intact. This segment highlights the challenges of reforming a system that continues to suppress political alternatives, emphasizing the resilience of communist ideology.
"You say, "I never said to kill the people, I said that they should live." But once you nuke capitalism, you're going to lose freedom, you're going to lose the ability to have politics, you're goi..."
In this segment, Kotkin discusses China's approach to economic reform under Deng Xiaoping, contrasting it with the political repression that persists. He argues that while economic liberalization has lifted millions out of poverty, it has not led to political freedom. This segment illustrates the tension between economic growth and the maintenance of a communist political monopoly.
"of property, we have to undo collective farms, we have to undo the dictatorship… Instead of saying that, they say, "We get a chance to do it right this time without the evil Stalin who messed it..."
Kotkin critiques the narrative that attributes China's economic success solely to the Communist Party's policies. He argues that the real drivers of growth are the entrepreneurial spirit and hard work of the Chinese people, while the Party's role has been to suppress political alternatives. This segment challenges the conventional wisdom about the relationship between governance and economic prosperity.
"that are at fault. China actually did reform the system and they didn't just discredit the Cultural Revolution. They said no, much of the planning and state-owned enterprises was a mistaken idea. ..."
In this segment, Kotkin explains how the Chinese Communist Party has reluctantly accepted market forces due to societal pressures. He discusses the gradual emergence of market behavior from the shadows into a quasi-legal realm, highlighting the tension between state control and economic necessity. This segment underscores the complexities of implementing economic reforms within a rigid political framework.
"But I do have a different question. Wait, that's not exactly the way you described it. You have a point. You're onto something, DK. But it needs to be qualified. What happens in Deng Xiaoping's ca..."
Kotkin reflects on the interplay between policy and economic success in both communist and capitalist systems. He argues that while policy can influence outcomes, the underlying entrepreneurial spirit of individuals is crucial for wealth creation. This segment emphasizes the importance of understanding the limitations of policy in shaping economic realities.
"Therefore, there's something else that we can go to that's an alternative." Communism has suppressed all the alternatives. It's either return to tsarism or keep communism. In the Chinese case, you ..."
In this concluding segment, Kotkin challenges the perception that the Communist Party is responsible for China's economic achievements. He argues that the Party's oppressive policies initially created poverty, and it is the resilience and ingenuity of the Chinese people that have driven progress. This segment calls into question the narrative of communist success and highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of historical and economic dynamics.
"and control and transform the psychology and behavior of the capital. Of course, it fails. Instead, the party members are in cahoots with the millionaires. They begin to form their own businesses..."
Stephen Kotkin discusses the complexities of economic policy in the context of the United States' sustained global economic dominance. He argues that while policy matters, it cannot solely account for the wealth creation seen over 150 years. Kotkin emphasizes the importance of incentives for officials and the broader economic environment, suggesting that the success of the U.S. economy is not merely a product of policy decisions but also of deeper systemic factors.
"government wasn't maximally stupid. Fair point, DK. We often exaggerate the role of policy in all realms because we do policy ourselves or we talk to policymakers. We have a bias towards the causa..."
In this segment, Kotkin critiques the narrative that the Communist Party solely engineered China's economic miracle. He argues that while the Party played a role, it largely capitalized on existing economic conditions and the hard work of the populace. He highlights the importance of understanding the interplay between policy and economic realities, suggesting that the Party's actions were more opportunistic than transformative.
"We have to understand in the communist sense that incentives matter. When you create incentives for officials to increase GDP and to increase job creation, and that's how they get rewarded, you'r..."
Kotkin elaborates on Deng Xiaoping's pivotal decision to pivot China's economic strategy towards a partnership with the United States, contrasting it with Japan's post-war recovery. He explains how Deng recognized the importance of aligning with the U.S. market to foster economic growth, utilizing lessons from Japan's success. This strategic reorientation was crucial for China's subsequent economic development.
"This is part of the dynamic of us seeing communism as potentially successful. We criticize these fools who thought that the Stalin regime was not going to kill them, and was not going to produce ..."
In this segment, Kotkin discusses the significance of Hong Kong as a financial hub that facilitated China's economic transformation. He explains how the British-controlled system in Hong Kong allowed for capital allocation based on market principles, which was essential for China's development. Kotkin argues that without Hong Kong, the economic miracle under Deng Xiaoping would not have been possible.
"That's a Clinton initiative that happens right when Bush is going to come to office. The secret sauce is, you have to manufacture and export to the American domestic market because the American m..."
Kotkin outlines the East Asian economic model, highlighting how countries like Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea successfully leveraged their relationships with the U.S. to drive growth. He emphasizes that China's adoption of this model, filtered through Hong Kong, was key to its rise. This segment underscores the interconnectedness of global economies and the importance of strategic partnerships.
"The other thing they have is overseas Chinese who know the culture, speak the language, and are going to do the FDI, again routed through Hong Kong. So you have Taiwan. Ironically, the failure t..."
In this segment, Kotkin argues that the Communist Party of China often receives undue credit for the country's economic achievements. He asserts that the Party's role was more about exploiting existing conditions rather than creating them. Kotkin emphasizes the need to recognize the contributions of external factors and other nations in China's economic ascent.
"that American consumers will buy. American consumers are not forced to buy Chinese products. They're just better, and they're cheaper. So they buy them because it's a market and there's competitio..."
Kotkin delves into the importance of counterfactuals in understanding historical events, particularly regarding Stalin's rise to power. He poses questions about how different leaders might have navigated the political landscape had circumstances been altered. This segment highlights the complexities of historical causation and the role of individual agency in shaping outcomes.
"Counterfactuals are really critical for historical thought. A lot of historians are pedantic about this. They say we're against counterfactuals, it's just speculation. But every single one of th..."
In this segment, Kotkin explores the dynamics of power within a dictatorship, particularly focusing on Stalin's methods. He discusses how Stalin's experiences shaped his approach to governance and the consolidation of power. Kotkin raises questions about the nature of leadership and the psychological factors that influence a dictator's actions.
"what the larger context in the world looks like? Here you have a Communist party that seizes power. As I said, unlike the case of Bavaria, southern Germany, northern Italy, Hungary, it holds power..."
Kotkin examines the collective action problem faced by individuals within a dictatorship, using Stalin's regime as a case study. He explains why potential rivals often fail to act against a dictator, highlighting issues of trust and self-preservation. This segment sheds light on the psychological and social barriers that prevent dissent in authoritarian regimes.
"Someone who would then come out the other side of that as the victor with this gigantic secret police that was really small but got really big in the process of doing the very thing that people..."
Stephen Kotkin explores why elites in authoritarian regimes, like Xi Jinping and Putin, often do not remove their leaders despite the ruin they bring. He discusses the collective action problem and the unique effectiveness of Stalin's dictatorship, which creates a sense of loyalty and fear among those around him, preventing them from acting against him.
"him let him do that? Around Putin, the people are falling out of windows. Instead of falling out of the windows themselves, why don't they push him out the window? Khamenei in Iran, he's brought r..."
Kotkin delves into the lack of trust within Stalin's regime, explaining how fear of betrayal prevents functionaries from uniting against him. He illustrates the paranoia that permeates these dictatorships, where even the thought of dissent can lead to self-preservation actions that reinforce the dictator's power.
"Of course, they know that they can't do what he does. If they tried to unseat him, they might save their lives but they might lose the revolution, the system and the radiant future, the overthro..."
In this segment, Kotkin contrasts Stalin's security measures with those of other dictators like Hitler. He explains how Stalin's regime was insulated from assassination attempts due to his strategic avoidance of public appearances and the pervasive surveillance that kept potential dissenters in check.
"got a point there. What can we do about this?" But you know that Stalin is constantly doing these provocations, or you suspect he is. You know that he's got people, provocateurs who are around the..."
Kotkin discusses the rarity of serious assassination attempts on Stalin compared to other dictators. He highlights the psychological and systemic factors that contributed to this phenomenon, including the loyalty of regime members and the lack of opportunities for dissenters to act against him.
"Even so, it is paradoxical because when Hitler goes to make a speech, every year Hitler makes a speech in Munich. It's known when he's going to make the speech. It's announced in the paper. There..."
Kotkin draws parallels between the struggles of Eastern Europe in the late 1980s and the current situation in China. He examines the implications of a Marxist-Leninist regime's monopoly on power and the challenges of political reform, emphasizing the lessons learned from historical events like Gorbachev's reforms.
"They didn't know that Stalin was in the boat. You've written other books about the collapse of the Soviet Union. There's this last ditch effort in the Eastern Bloc where there's falling productiv..."
In this segment, Kotkin analyzes the tension between economic liberalization and political control in authoritarian regimes. He discusses how too much economic freedom can threaten the regime's stability, while too little can hinder growth, creating a precarious balance for leaders like Xi Jinping.
"What happens in communist political reform, not economic reform where they allow some market behavior, but where you liberalize the system and you open it up politically… You say, DK, let's have..."
Kotkin explores the belief among authoritarian leaders that technology can enhance their control and efficiency. He critiques this notion, arguing that while technology may improve productivity, it cannot solve the fundamental issue of political legitimacy that underpins the survival of these regimes.
"They're not going to commit suicide like what happened with Gorbachev. This means their policy options, their menu of policy options, is limited. They can open up the economy, but if it gets too ..."
Kotkin discusses the fragility of alliances among authoritarian regimes, using Iran as a case study. He emphasizes that while these regimes may provide military and technological support, they cannot offer the political legitimacy that is crucial for survival, highlighting the vulnerabilities of such governments.
"Here's the problem with that argument. First, it didn't work the last time. That doesn't mean it won't work this time, but the track record, even though it's a small number of cases, is not good. ..."
In this segment, Kotkin challenges the notion of a social contract between authoritarian regimes and their citizens. He argues that when regimes fail to deliver on promises of prosperity, they resort to repression rather than accountability, revealing the inherent instability of such systems.
"A lot of people are indifferent but a majority of the people despise this regime and want to see it go. They're patriots for Iran, but they detest the mullah's clerical regime. Neither Russia nor..."
Kotkin concludes by examining the critical role of political legitimacy in maintaining authoritarian power. He argues that when the repressive apparatus loses the will to enforce the regime's will, it can lead to a collapse of authority, drawing parallels to historical moments of defection and resistance.
"The challenge for them is that somebody has to do the repression. The repressive apparatus is not a machine. It's not AI. It's not something which is mechanical. It's people. It's people who grow..."
In this segment, Kotkin elaborates on the importance of legitimacy in sustaining authoritarian regimes. He contrasts the temporary legitimacy Stalin had through his revolutionary vision with the current lack of legitimacy in Russia and China. Kotkin argues that without structural reforms and genuine citizen engagement, these regimes face inevitable decline. He highlights the paradox of needing to reform to maintain power while fearing the loss of control that reform might bring.
"that the communist regime can't solve with tech. You say, "Well, the tech could produce power and prosperity and China could relegitimize its rule just like it did with economic growth. The econom..."
Kotkin concludes with a reflection on the potential for global conflict, emphasizing the importance of avoiding a hot war between great powers. He contrasts the short-term risks of World War III with the long-term optimism for democratic systems. This segment encapsulates Kotkin's belief in the resilience of democratic ideals over time, despite the immediate threats posed by authoritarian regimes and geopolitical tensions.
"really interesting. In the short run, we're all dead because there could be a World War III. But in the long run, we're all good because our system is better. So we have to elongate the short run...."