
40 segments available
This is my fourth interview with the pre-eminent infovore Tyler Cowen – and yet I’m always hearing new stuff from him. We talked at the Progress Conference 2024 about why he thinks AI won't drive explosive economic growth, the real bottlenecks on progress, him now writing for AIs instead of humans, and the difficult relationship between being cultured and fostering growth – among many other things. Thanks to the Roots of Progress Institute (with special thanks to Jason Crawford and Heike Larson) for such a wonderful conference, and to @freethink for the videography. Roots of Progress Institute: https://rootsofprogress.org/ 𝐄𝐏𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐃𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊𝐒 * Transcript: https://www.dwarkeshpatel.com/p/tyler-cowen-4 * Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/3RFuS7b * Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/48EIEaESY0IGxf02pzIEIN?si=d2S1y6HUQuulAOGKVV7GhQ 𝐒𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐎𝐑𝐒 * I’m grateful to Tyler for volunteering to say a few words about Jane Street. It's the first time that a guest has participated in the sponsorship. I hope you can see why Tyler and I think so highly of Jane Street. To learn more about their open roles, go to https://janestreet.com/dwarkesh 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 00:00:00 - Economic Growth and AI 00:15:45 - Founder Mode and increasing variance 00:30:19 - Effective Altruism and Progress Studies 00:33:53 - What AI changes for Tyler 00:45:45 - The slow diffusion of innovation 00:50:41 - Stalin's library 00:53:07 - DC vs SF vs EU
Tyler Cowen discusses why he believes AI will not lead to explosive economic growth rates, emphasizing the concept of 'cost disease' in sectors that cannot effectively utilize AI. He explains how rapid growth in certain areas can lead to stagnation in others, ultimately limiting overall economic progress.
"Tyler, welcome. Dwarkesh, great to be chatting with you. Why won't we have explosive economic growth, 20% plus, because of AI? It's very hard to get explosive economic growth for any reason, AI ..."
Cowen elaborates on the idea of bottlenecks in economic growth, arguing that despite increases in intelligence and productivity, other constraints will become more binding. He highlights the importance of quality institutions and the fragility of innovation, suggesting that simply increasing population or intelligence won't guarantee rapid growth.
"you could agree with that, right? I don't know what the word "could" means. So I would say this: You look at market data, say real interest rates, stock prices, right now everything looks so norm..."
In this segment, Cowen addresses the scarcity of high-IQ workers and how this impacts economic growth. He argues that while having more intelligent individuals can help, the real bottlenecks are often human-related, such as institutional inefficiencies and the challenges of implementing AI in various sectors.
"You're one of our best people, right? You're frustrated by all kinds of things. I think I'm gonna be making a lot more podcasts after AGI. Okay, good. I'll listen. I'll be bottlenecked by time. ..."
Cowen predicts that AI will gradually boost economic growth rates over decades, but the changes will be subtle and not immediately noticeable. He compares this to historical technological advancements, emphasizing that while AI has the potential to transform the world, the process will be slow and fraught with challenges.
"but it's not actually that important. It's the bundle, and the bundles are scarce. And then the bundles interacting with the rest of the world. Like just try going to a mid-tier state university ..."
Cowen explores the contradictions in perspectives on economic growth, particularly regarding population increases and their effects. He critiques existing economic models for their inability to predict growth accurately and emphasizes the importance of understanding the complex interactions between various factors.
"feel it as so revolutionary for a long time. The whole vibe of this progress studies thing is, look, we've got all these low-hanging fruits or medium-hanging fruits that if we fix our institution..."
In this segment, Cowen reflects on historical examples of economic growth, such as China's rapid development post-Deng Xiaoping. He discusses how bottlenecks can hinder progress and the challenges faced by countries trying to scale their economies, drawing parallels to the potential future of AI-driven growth.
"basically totally wrong. The people who study that issue, I trust the experts. If you put together the two views where in each area you trust the experts, then you get my view, which is amazing ..."
Cowen shares his evolving views on AI, noting that he sees more potential in its capabilities than he did previously. He acknowledges the rapid advancements in AI technology and discusses the implications for economic reasoning and the future of human-AI collaboration.
"have to go from the farmers to industrial revolution 10x. You can just look at actually cases in history where we have had 10x rates, sorry, 10% increase rates of economic growth. You go to Chin..."
In this segment, Cowen shares his evolving perspective on AI, noting that he sees more potential in AI now than he did a year ago. He acknowledges the impressive advancements in AI models and speculates that AI could soon outperform human experts in economic reasoning. This highlights the ongoing tension between human capabilities and the rapid development of AI technologies.
"shocked if somebody's AI model, in less than three years, beat human experts on a regular basis. Let's put it that way. Did that update you in any way, that now you've resigned on these questions..."
Cowen reflects on the importance of founders in organizations, emphasizing that they possess a unique courage that enables them to implement significant changes. He draws parallels with the Beatles, suggesting that their success was partly due to the courage and vision of their members. This segment explores how founder-led initiatives can drive innovation and stability within institutions.
"Yesterday, Patrick was talking about how important it is for the founders of different institutions to hang around and be the ones in charge. I've heard you talk about, you know, the Beatles wer..."
In this engaging discussion, Cowen analyzes the dynamics of the Beatles' success, attributing it to the creative tension among its members. He contrasts their impact with that of other long-lasting bands, suggesting that the Beatles' brief but intense period of collaboration produced unparalleled value. This segment underscores the significance of creative conflict in achieving extraordinary outcomes.
"for courage. Those would be two reasons. How does that explain the Beatles' success? Well, the Beatles are an interesting example. I mean, they broke up in 1970, right? The Rolling Stones are stil..."
Cowen discusses the concept of increasing variance in talent among young people, noting that while top performers are excelling more than ever, there is a concerning decline in the middle of the talent distribution. He uses examples from chess and sports to illustrate how the best are getting better, while also acknowledging the challenges faced by the average performer. This segment raises questions about the implications of this trend for society.
"observation of the competency crisis? I see it differently from Patrick, and he and I have discussed this. I think there's basically increasing variance in the distribution. Young people at the to..."
In this segment, Cowen addresses concerns about declining test scores among students, arguing that the narrative may be exaggerated. He suggests that while there may be some decline, the overall performance of top students is improving. Cowen emphasizes the need to consider the context of testing and the impact of recent events like the pandemic on educational outcomes.
"pretty proven by numbers that that's the case. I would say this increasing variance is a weird mix of where the gains and declines are showing up. I've said this to Patrick, and I'm going to say ..."
Cowen responds to anecdotal claims about the decline in quality among elite students, particularly at institutions like Stanford. He argues that the standards remain high and that the students he encounters are impressive. This segment highlights the importance of maintaining rigorous expectations in education and the potential disconnect between perception and reality.
"there's a very modest decline, I would say. If the top is getting better, what do you make of the anecdotal data he was talking about yesterday where the Stanford kids come up to him and say, "Al..."
Cowen reflects on the evolution of young talent over time, comparing current young achievers to historical figures like Winston Churchill. He argues that today's youth are performing at higher levels than previous generations, citing advancements in technology and access to information. This segment emphasizes the progress made by young individuals and the changing landscape of talent development.
"high standards the Beatles had. How old are you, by the way? Okay, now go back however many years. Was there a 24-year-old like you doing the equivalent of podcasting? It's just clearly better now..."
In this segment, Cowen discusses the quality of political leadership in contemporary times, contrasting it with historical figures like Jefferson and Hamilton. He acknowledges the impressive capabilities of many current leaders while also critiquing the selection process that often leads to subpar candidates. This analysis raises important questions about the nature of leadership and the factors influencing political success.
"Okay, so even if you don't buy the Stanford kids, if you don't buy the young kids, the other trend he was talking about, where if you look at the leaders in government, whatever you think of Tru..."
Cowen examines the emergence of destructive leaders in the early 20th century, attributing their rise to a combination of bad luck and the chaotic political landscape of the time. He discusses how new technologies and arms races can lead to the ascendance of harmful figures in power. This segment provides a historical perspective on leadership and the consequences of societal upheaval.
"Well, give me like a country and a name and a time period, and I'll try to answer it. He was from the university. That's what was wrong with him, right? Just think of what school it was. Who? Wood..."
In this concluding segment, Cowen reflects on the volatility that often accompanies periods of significant change, such as the scientific revolution in 17th-century England. He discusses the factors contributing to societal upheaval and the challenges of navigating new ideas and power dynamics. This analysis highlights the complexities of progress and the unpredictable nature of historical transformations.
"but that would be like a partial start. You compared our current period to 17th-century England, where you have a lot of new ideas and things go topsy-turvy. What's your theory of why things go t..."
Cowen emphasizes the challenge of ensuring that advancements, particularly in AI, lead to beneficial outcomes rather than societal turmoil. He acknowledges the potential for a new era of volatility as technological progress accelerates, urging a careful approach to managing these changes.
"It seems like a simple question, but how do you make sure we get the good things and not the crazy civil war as well? You try at the margin to nudge toward the better set of things. But it's poss..."
In this segment, Cowen discusses the trajectory of Effective Altruism (EA) and its potential decline following high-profile failures. He reflects on the community's past exuberance and the fragility of movements, drawing parallels to historical patterns of rise and fall in social movements.
"What's your most underrated cult? Most underrated cult? Progress studies. I think you called peak EA right before SBF fell. That's right. I was at an EA meeting, and I said, "Hey everyone, this is ..."
Cowen shares insights on the fragility of social movements, particularly Effective Altruism, highlighting the lack of institutional support and the presence of cult-like tendencies. He warns that without solid foundations, movements may collapse despite having valuable ideas.
"Well, I was surprised when SBF was insolvent. I thought it was a high-risk venture that had no regulatory defense and would end up being worth zero, but I didn't think he was actually playing fu..."
Cowen discusses the future of Progress Studies, emphasizing its decentralized nature and potential for lasting impact. He expresses optimism about the movement's trajectory, suggesting that it could lead to significant improvements in science policy and societal progress.
"still. And from this day onwards, I don't give up that belief at all. But just as a movement, I thought it was going to collapse. When do we hit peak progress studies? You know, when Patrick and I..."
In this segment, Cowen reflects on how the advent of AI influences his approach to Progress Studies. He argues that while AI offers new opportunities, it also complicates decision-making and increases the need for guidance in navigating complex choices.
"That's not proven yet. You see some signs of that. You wouldn't say it's really flipped, but a lot of reforms. You're in an area like no one else has any idea, much less a better idea or a good id..."
Cowen reveals his shift in writing focus towards AI audiences, emphasizing the importance of creating content that resonates with future AI models. He argues that this approach is essential for ensuring his intellectual contributions are recognized and valued in the future.
"developing networks in a way where if there somehow had been no transformers and LLMs, I would have stayed a bit more as the producer of content. When I was preparing to interview you, I asked Cl..."
Cowen discusses the nuances of human interaction that cannot be captured by AI, particularly in interviews. He highlights the importance of non-verbal cues and the subtleties of communication that contribute to understanding a person's character and potential.
"As far as I can tell, no one else is doing this. No one is writing or recording for the AIs very much. But if you believe even a modest version of this progress—and I'm modest in what I believe ..."
In this segment, Cowen shares insights on the intuitive aspects of decision-making, particularly in evaluating grant applications. He emphasizes the significance of gut feelings and the ability to read between the lines in assessing candidates' potential.
"Do you actually have a conscious theory of what's going on when you get on a call with somebody, and three minutes later you're like, "You're not getting the grant"? What happens? Well, often the..."
Cowen examines the dynamics of talent clusters in innovation and achievement, discussing how exceptional individuals are often drawn to each other. He reflects on the challenges of creating environments that foster high-level collaboration and the rarity of sustained excellence.
"And what's going on with the 75%? We don't know. But I think you can become much better at figuring out the other 75%, partly just with practice. Yesterday Patrick was talking about these concent..."
Cowen concludes with thoughts on the potential impact of AI on economic growth rates. He raises questions about the implications of AI advancements for future progress and the importance of maintaining a critical perspective on technological developments.
"to be seen how much it helps us with that. I'm guessing ever since you wrote the progress studies article, you got a lot of applications for Emergent Ventures from people who want to do some prog..."
Cowen explores the tension between specialization and individuality in the context of economic progress. He references Adam Smith's views on specialization and raises concerns about potential demoralization in the workforce due to AI advancements. This segment delves into the implications of increased specialization on personal fulfillment and societal happiness.
"Why aren't you more leveraged if you think the growth rate's going to go up even slightly? Well, I also have this view: maybe a lot of the equity premium is in the past. People, especially in thi..."
In this reflective segment, Cowen shares his aspiration to become an 'information trillionaire,' emphasizing the value of knowledge accumulation over monetary wealth. He contrasts his career expectations with the current landscape of economics and discusses the importance of continuous learning and intellectual curiosity. This segment highlights the evolving nature of success and the pursuit of knowledge.
"unknown that an economist could really earn anything at all. There were no tech jobs with billionaires. Finance was a low-paying field. When I started choosing a career, it was not a thing. Ther..."
Cowen addresses the concept of diffusion in technology and its slow pace, particularly in relation to AI. He critiques the overvaluation of intelligence in tech circles and emphasizes the importance of recognizing diminishing returns in innovation. This segment provides a critical perspective on the assumptions surrounding technological advancement and its real-world implications.
"more information and be an information trillionaire. Like Dana Joya has that same goal. He and I have talked about this. I think that's a very worthy goal. Was there a second field that you were ..."
In this segment, Cowen reflects on historical economic theories by Malthus and Ricardo regarding diminishing returns and their relevance to contemporary discussions about AI. He argues that while AI may extend the frontier of progress, it won't solve all problems, echoing the cautious optimism of classical economists. This discussion connects historical insights with modern technological challenges.
"And that's not going to change. No one's built a real model to show why it should change, other than sort of hyperventilating blog posts about everything's going to change right away. The model i..."
Cowen contemplates the future of work in an AI-driven world, expressing concerns about potential demoralization and the nature of employment. He acknowledges the uncertainty surrounding what roles will remain and how fulfilling they will be. This segment raises important questions about the impact of AI on individual identity and job satisfaction.
"One concern you could have about progress in general is, if you look at the famous Adam Smith example, you've got that pin maker, and the specialization obviously has all these efficiencies. But..."
Cowen discusses the balance between mainstream knowledge and esoteric insights in his podcasting approach. He shares his preference for interviewing historians and the challenges of preparing for scientific discussions. This segment highlights the importance of diverse perspectives in understanding complex topics and the limitations of expertise.
"I don't have pessimistic expectations. I just see it as a big change. I don't feel I have a good prediction. And if you don't have a good prediction, you should be a bit wary and just say, "Okay..."
In this segment, Cowen analyzes Stalin's reading habits and the absence of doubt in his Marxist beliefs. He attributes this to the dogmatic culture surrounding Stalin and discusses the implications of such intellectual rigidity. This exploration of historical figures provides insights into the interplay between culture, ideology, and individual thought.
"fun work for me. I know I always learn something. Now I'm prepping for Stephen Kotkin, who's an expert on Stalin and Soviet Russia. That's been a blast. I've been doing that for four months, read..."
Cowen critiques Hayek's views on autocracy, arguing that not all autocratic regimes are led by the worst individuals. He cites examples like the UAE to illustrate that meritocratic governance can exist in unexpected contexts. This segment challenges conventional wisdom about leadership in autocracies and highlights the complexity of political systems.
"That's right. There's a lot of other evidence that that's the correct portrait. What's going on there? A smart guy who's read all this literature, all these different things, never even questions..."
Cowen contrasts the perspectives on progress between the Bay Area and Washington, D.C. He notes the extremes in thinking about growth and innovation in these regions and emphasizes the need for balance. This segment reflects on how cultural contexts shape attitudes toward progress and the implications for future growth.
"So, it's a tendency. There are other forces, but culture really matters. Hayek is writing about a very specific place and time. It really surprised me. There are these family-based Gulf monarchie..."
Cowen reflects on his cultural identity as an American compared to cultured Europeans. He humorously describes himself as a 'barbarian' with a veneer of culture, emphasizing the differences in cultural appreciation and understanding between himself and the French intellectuals he encounters. This segment explores the balance between culture and growth.
"So there's some way in which all these things have to balance. I think the US has done a marvelous job at that, and we need to preserve that. What I see happening—the UK used to do a great job at..."
In this thought-provoking segment, Cowen challenges conventional definitions of autism, suggesting that many people may fall under a broader, yet unrecognized, definition. He critiques the stigma associated with the term and calls for a reevaluation of how we understand autism in society.
"feel the French person is very foreign from me. And there's something about America they might find strange or repellent. And I'm just so used to it. I see intellectually how many areas we fall f..."
Cowen addresses the perceived lack of influence that the tech industry has in Washington D.C. He argues that tech is gaining influence through national security concerns, despite the industry's challenges in political representation. This segment highlights the complexities of lobbying and influence in the political landscape.
"One frustration that tech people have is that they have very little influence, it seems, in Washington compared to how big that industry is. Industries that are much smaller will have much great..."
Cowen expresses his concerns about the relationship between technological progress and war. He reflects on historical patterns where advancements lead to destructive conflicts, emphasizing the need for caution as new technologies emerge. Despite his pessimism, he ends on an optimistic note about human agency and the potential for positive change.
"You all here are so far from that, in part because you're dynamic and you're clustered. Final question. Based on yesterday's session, it seems like Patrick's main misgiving with progress is that ..."