0:00
You're watching TVP.
You're watching TVP.
>> Sam Alman says something interesting here.
He says, "I don't want to quibble on the exact definition of the touring test.
By the popular conception, we kind of have passed it."
And most people in 2020 did not think that was going to happen.
So now, if in the next 5 years we really we really deliver on AI, there's discovery and important new science and we were hyping our progress and our excitement a little bit too much.
I think we deserve some grace there, but it's annoying and we should do less.
So he says he says by the popular conception we have passed the touring test.
And so >> we were having a little bit of a debate. >> Yeah.
>> A couple nights ago talking about >> have we have we and so and so I ran I ran the touring test and so I asked chat GPT GPT5. >> We haven't.
>> Do you think we passed the touring test?
And I asked Tyler the same question.
And so one of these answers is from Tyler the human and the other is from chat GPT.
So um I'll give you answer A and then I'll give you answer B and you'll have to detect which one is AI. Is A or B AI?
>> So answer A to the question, do you think we passed the touring test?
That's a fascinating question and one that doesn't doesn't have a single yes or no answer because it depends on how you define passing the touring test or whether you think that test is still a useful benchmark.
But I'll walk you through the terrain then give you my verdict.
What is the touring test and what does passing mean?
Alan Turing proposed in 1950 that instead of trying to define thinking, we ask, can a machine imitate human conversational behavior well enough that a human evaluator can't reliably tell the machine from a human in a textual dialogue?
Over time, people have realized many problems.
The test doesn't measure understanding, consciousness, creativity, or reasoning depth, only imitation of conversation behavior and emotional stylistic cues. So that is answer A.
And then answer B is I asked uh do you think we passed the touring test? And the answer yes.
We did that a long time ago.
So which one do you think is AI?
Which one do you think is Tyler?
>> Wait, what was the Sorry.
The first >> the first one was that's a fascinating question and one that doesn't have a single yes or no answer because it depends on how you define passing the touring test or whether and then the second one is just yes.
I asked Tyler, do you think we passed the touring test? Yes, of course.
Uh, and it was just so so funny to hit him with that.
And, uh, it does it does clearly illustrate like the difference in how the that even though you can't tell the it it's speaking English, well, it still has like a very specific style to it.
Uh, whereas Tyler just says like, "Yeah, yeah, we passed it."
>> But in doing so, Yeah.
What's your reaction to this?
>> Okay, Tyler, you should have answered uh what what Bobby in the chat is saying. You're absolutely right. >> Just >> Yeah. >> I mean, yeah.
So like obviously chatbt has like a very specific style of speaking.
>> Um >> you can see um you know there's some uh it's like pokey uh it like they train they train the model or poke is that what it's called? >> Oh. Oh the the AI app. com.
>> You can train the model to speak with a different style. Yeah.
>> And then I think it's much harder to tell.
Um, like you I I think even if I just if you just prompted the model to say answer it very succinctly, very concisely, um, I think it'd be much harder to tell.
>> But I didn't have to prompt you for that.
I didn't have to tell you answer succinctly.
You just did because you're confident about that.
>> Well, sure, but it's like um, how do you define like prompting the AI?
If it's part of the system prompt, is that like part of the prompt or is that part of the model?
If you like bake it into the weights, then like where where does the where's the line, right?
does the where's the line, right? like >> um if you have one of those like poke model or interaction like all these things um >> like does it really matter if it's in the prompt or if it's like a RL step at the end like you know >> I don't know I I I think there's just like as I look through our text back and
forth there are sometimes when you drop a whole paragraph sometimes you ask a question sometimes you feed it back to me and it feels very different from the back and forth with GPT5 but it it's like yeah it does I think I think one correct if you showed these outputs to two people at a Walmart super center in Nebraska. >> Sure. >> Sure.
>> How many people would clock it >> or how many people would prefer the nuanced answer that GPT5 gave because a lot of people would I mean you didn't tell me about when Allan Touring proposed the touring test.
You didn't give me any backstory.
You just you just you just ripped an answer.
Some people might prefer that chatbot would give this like sort of short to the point answer without a lot of nuance, >> but I think it's I I think it is clear that we we did pass one definition of the touring test.
There's still something else going on.
And it's a little bit uh it's it's obviously a nuance question, but but it does uh but I think the point holds that that OpenAI has uh underhyped a few key things that have just like blown everyone away.
And people have been very very impressed by that.
And so you do have to give them a few uh you have to give them more credit.
Like you have to give them the benefit of the doubt on a lot of these things um because they've made so much progress.