0:01
[music] I see a large IPM on the horizon.
[music] I see a large IPM on the horizon.
[music] You're surrounded [music] by journalists. Hold your position.
[music] Overnight success.
The place maker 3000 double right.
>> [music] >> There's misinformation clearing order inbound. Let's just roll.
>> We are surrounded by general.
[music] Hold your position. >> Get up. Trust the experts here. We are experts. Founder Mel 5.
>> I see multiple journalists on the horizon. Stand by.
>> [music] >> UAV online. >> Blaze win. [music] >> Double blaze. Triple blaze. [music] Double kill. By team deathmatch. We are experts. [music] Triple blades. That's just wrong. Right.
Marky clearing order inbound.
>> [music] [music] >> We are surrounded by journalists. Hold your position. [music] Strike two.
>> Activate gold to retriever mode.
[music] >> Marky clearing [music] order inbound. Five.
I see multiple more journalists on the horizon. Never mind. Founder.
>> [music] >> You're watching TVPN >> and I'm zoomed in. You're zoomed out.
It's Wednesday, July 1st, 2026.
We're live from the TVP Ultra, the Template Technology, the capital.
Let me tell you about Ram. Time is money. Save both.
Easy use corporate cards, bill pay, accounting, and a whole lot more all in one place.
Jordan, why are you hitting the gong so hard? What is that for?
>> Is that for Mark Zuckerberg and Meta? Two gongs for two.
>> People are always complaining that we don't warm up the gong enough.
[laughter] >> And so I warmed up the show. You're welcome. >> Warm it up. >> Now it's warmed up.
Couple warm [laughter] up hits to get it warmed up. You'll love to see it.
Uh anyway, we got a great show for you today, folks.
Mark Pinkis is coming on.
We got backtoback IPOs, Wayne Tang from Lime, Luca Ferrari from Bending Spoons.
Uh we got a bunch of other folks.
We got Nick Gman from USV talking about the Rebel Alliance thesis.
And Amble, we got Julian from Amble, the co-founder and chief design officer, coming on to talk about the electric golf cart very aesthetic that you're a big fan of, right? >> I'm a huge fan of. >> Huge fan.
Very excited to talk to him. Perfect show today. Perfect show. >> Perfect show today.
Uh so our first guest will be joining in 30 minutes and we'll take you through the news. Meta is selling comput.
They're getting out of the computing business.
They said we don't need computers anymore to do what we need to do. We don't need them.
We're going to be selling them.
Uh Meta Platforms is developing plans for a cloud infrastructure business to sell access to AI computing power and models competing with industry leaders like AWS and GCP.
The company is considering selling access to various AI models hosted on its existing AI infrastructure as well as raw computing capacity as part of its MetaMP compute initiative.
Meta plans to generate revenue from excessive computing power uh could help return its investment in AI infrastructure includes hundreds of billions of dollars spent on data centers and expensive chips.
And so um lots of reactions to this.
The the the Neocloud market is selling off.
Oddly enough, Meta has a bunch of NeoCloud contracts.
Some of those companies are selling off because now they're a buyer and also a competitor.
Uh lots of different takes about, you know, Meta finding its footing, finding something that justifies the massive uh capex.
Of course, >> it's deeply confusing, John. >> Yeah. Is it?
>> I mean, the whole thing, the whole thing, >> I think that uh I think it is practical what they're doing. >> Yeah.
But uh it shouldn't it doesn't uh as somebody that that uh you know I would say overall has been a big you know cheerleader for Meta I think it's truly the best >> in in my view it is the perfect business.
>> Um it doesn't give you a lot of confidence in like the strategy overall.
They're signing these Neo cloud deals worth >> tens of billions of dollars.
they're built, you know, spending hundreds of billions of dollars.
And yeah, they can make the argument that these type of um like doing any type of NeoCloud deals themselves is just good business.
It's it's just like how it's just the best way to get ROI today. Yep.
>> It doesn't give you a lot of confidence that there's near-term products on the horizon for Meta that are going to be able to utilize that capacity themselves, which is >> clearly been their strategy.
I Mark and and the team have never have never said we want to be in the cloud business.
They've talked about >> Yeah.
>> They've talked about the possibility of it. >> Yeah.
>> But >> the stated goal of MSL is personal super intelligence.
We don't know what >> which I was a fan of and I think you were a huge fan of you were like manis on your phone going around your social networks.
That's my biggest bullcase for all of this.
like it's very that there are so many different applications that I can imagine being a daily driver of in the meta family of apps.
Uh oddly none of that has really been even tried in my opinion.
It feels like a little bit early.
early. really seen so far is Muse Spark >> good on benchmarks like decent you know like >> but but again not anything to that that anyone should really get that excited about >> as a you know oh as an API provider they did announce that they were going to release it API I don't think they have they might still
>> it's a model it's a good model sir but I don't think it will have a lot of demand and then we've seen Meta Vibes which was a midjourney >> yeah rapper, but the the fact even if uh even if Muse Spark is not on the super gega frontier, can it be good enough to get some work done inside meta family of apps? Like it should. I would imagine Like it should.
I would imagine yes, but they just haven't found that that killer feature.
Like there are plenty of there are plenty of applications that are AI powered.
There are plenty of models out there that have found their footing without being on the you know super intelligence path or on that particular curve. >> Yeah.
And and it's interesting because yesterday we were talking about the story where Google had been telling Meta like hey we don't have the capacity >> for you and here uh here Meta is uh with with plenty of capacity themselves.
I don't think we can read too much into this because it's just one article from Bloomberg.
Uh I think it will matter a lot who the potential buyers of compute are going to be if it's there's a number of companies that I think the market would get excited about. Yeah.
>> But if they're actually just going and trying to compete as >> Yeah.
It's weird that it came as a leak about around like a plan to sell compute as opposed to just what SpaceX did where it was just like boom huge contract with Anthropic, lots of excitement going into the IPO.
Like that was such a perfectly massaged story as SpaceX entered the public markets.
That would have been great if they just said, "Hey, we have a Frontier Lab that's paying us a billion dollars a month now."
And like it's going to show up in earnings next quarter. Like get ready.
But the stock market loved it.
Like the stock is way up and I don't know if it's way up because they see it as a huge growth area for Meta. Now is it that crazy?
Well, I think it's because people have been wondering like where's the ROI going to come from for this hundreds of billions of dollars spend and up until now there's been >> no obvious place that it's going to come from, right?
You had the Man of Steel that's being unwound. >> Yeah.
>> Uh they have the the deal with, you know, Midjourney and Vibes.
That's, you know, unclear. >> Yeah.
>> There's It seems very obvious that they're going to be able to integrate AI into their glasses over time. Yeah.
But the glasses that have product market fit today are more of just like the uh I I think the product market fit is really with the camera, >> not the intelligence combined with a pair of glasses. >> Yeah.
Which is also surprising that we haven't seen a diffusion model, an image model, because uh even if you don't like Instagram in general is pretty it's it's remarkably slop free. At least my feed is.
I don't see a lot of viral slop images.
It it happens every once in a while, but they don't have they they have to have some twist to them.
But you can imagine AI powered features, background replacement, a lot of that stuff being AI enhanced and people receiving that very positively and enjoying that.
I was using Adobe uh like Adobe products recently and like in Photoshop they have an integration with Gemini Nano Banana and you can plug in all the different image models and you can actually use the tools in very interesting ways.
Um so sort of interesting I I don't know I would imagine that that would scale very quickly and use a lot of compute but yeah maybe this is uh a better way.
It does seem like it's easier to set up a NeoCloud than a true cloud platform.
Like if they were jumping into AWS or GCP and they wanted to have databases and servers and routers and elastic compute and also load balancing and uh and a uh DNS and you know all the different features that come with a true cloud platform that might be a tougher lift, might be a bigger lift, but just saying >> we have a bunch of servers.
we're going to run whatever model you want and then we will uh serve it serve the tokens to your API.
That doesn't seem like >> what would the stock do if they announced that they were and again I'm just like you know it's total hypothetical scenario but they were just spinning out all of their AI infrastructure and commitments and and powered shells to like a SpaceX.
>> Yeah, >> it would probably rip, you know, maybe even harder. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Maybe. I don't know.
Um, but uh, yeah, I I I keep going back to that idea of like the personal super intelligence. What do I actually want?
I ran into an interesting uh conundrum the other day because I've been sort of disappointed by the lack of AI in meta apps, which I know I'm like the only person that feels that way because the general vibe on Instagram is like extremely anti-AI and every other every other reel is like someone chugging a 55gallon drum of water and then doing a you know GPT 3. 5 impression.
Um but uh the uh but um I like Meta does have granular data about every reel I post.
Some do better than others.
Uh I went to Meta AI in the Instagram app and I asked uh what should I do more of in order to grow my account.
Um you know I'm a professional content creator essentially.
this would be useful sort of a high-powered analytics tools, personalized analytics tools for what I do.
I mean, the lifeblood of Instagram is the creator that actually posts.
A lot of people want to know what does well.
Um, but I got this like very generic uh LLM response.
We might be able to pull it up.
I think it's in I I shared the image in the timeline.
Let me see if I can pull it up here. Did I text it in? Did it go in? I don't know.
Uh, I can share it with the team.
Um, I got this very very generic uh, let me see if I can do this.
Um, this very very generic response that just said, wait, >> skill issue.
>> Skill issue basically. Oh, I don't know. It didn't go through.
Um, anyway, um, it said, uh, Buffer recommends focusing on sustainable organic growth instead of quick hacks like follow trains.
Post reels consistently since they get 36% more reach than carousels and 125.
It's so funny to be referencing.
It's referencing a blog post from a social media management SAS company. Exactly.
Like you would think that if you had I mean and clearly they're not focused on this use case, but you would think that there would be an opportunity to give creators personal and super intelligence to just be better creating on the platform. >> Yeah.
I said use Instagram and analytics to see which content converts viewers into followers and double down on it.
Like that's what I asked you to do.
[laughter] I said what can I do better to grow my following?
like you have all the data about what does well.
I don't want to go and look at this reel got 5,000 views, that one got 50,000 views.
What's the difference here? I want you to do that.
Uh collaborate with microcreators in your niche for authentic cross promotion rather than paid ads.
Engage with responding to comments and testing out.
It also said to optimize your profile with clear keywords in the bio and maintain a consistent visual brand.
It's like a lot of that I'm already doing.
A lot of that is is is is old.
And so, uh, I'm just like sort of disappointed that that like say what you want about Muse Spark and its benchmarks or whatever, like clearly if they wire that model up to the users's data, they should be able to integrate appropriately and they just haven't productized it properly.
And maybe if I get Manis and I get an API integration, like I could get there, but like it should just live in the Instagram search box, I imagine, since they already have an LLM there. It's just a legacy one.
Um, and so on the product side, it's just not it's just not enough to get to, okay, there's crazy demand for AI within the app.
Um, >> did you ask it if the shareholder value is three eggs is the goose values?
[laughter] >> That just sounds like a like a jumble of words.
Is that even a correct sentence? I don't [laughter] know. But >> sounds correct.
I mean, honestly, like the best place, it's very ironic, but the best place for Instagram growth hacks these days is just Adam Miser's front-facing videos.
Have you seen any of these?
So, he takes to Instagram, he uses Instagram very well.
He goes direct, posts reels about all sorts of things.
So, today I got surfaced one.
If you post something and it doesn't do well, should you delete it and then post it again and he says no because the algorithm will give the same result.
And your followers who saw the first one didn't like it, they're going to see it and like it even less the second time they see it.
So he just he just answers a bunch of common questions.
He does Q&As's and it's actually the best way to communicate and get insights into how the Instagram platform works.
But it's not personalized.
Like he's just giving generic one-sizefits-all advice.
I want the adseri brain enhanced with Meta's AI tailored to my account. That's what I want.
And uh like a social media co-pilot.
Uh but maybe I'm in the minority here. I I don't know.
Maybe I'm the only one that would want this.
I feel like uh tools for creators would be a great way to to launch this because even even like a small user they everyone almost always cares about I'd love to get a couple more views on whatever even if they're just using it in primarily a consumption tool.
Um and so uh and then there's also agentic shopping which we asked Mark Zuckerberg about at Metacon last year.
about at Metacon last year. um this idea that you know they're metarban displays they have the h they have the HUD they have AI you should be able to look at a pair of shoes and say order me those and uh he he sort of like gestured towards
that being one potential possible possible future but it's crazy to me that we haven't even seen them really try to remove at least one click from the shopping experience uh store some more of your data shorten the funnel increase conversion rates. That's good That's good for brands.
That's good for companies that advertise on meta. It's good for meta. It's good for users.
Uh and it just doesn't feel like that's where the energy has been uh in terms of productizing AI within the family of apps.
And so, um it feels like e-commerce will see agentic shopping happening. We're getting closer.
Computer uses getting better. APIs are there.
MCP servers and Shopify has a bunch of tools for this stuff.
But uh it's weird that Meta hasn't even been experimenting there and we haven't seen like oh yeah like they launched a thing where if you see an ad you can click a button and the agent will try and go check out with you and then just confirm the details within the meta app and you don't actually have to open up the Safari window.
I don't know maybe that works maybe that doesn't at least run the experiment. Maybe they have. I don't know. Maybe I just missed it.
But um either way, uh it feels Yeah, this feels like a windown of like the super intelligence ambitions that Zuck was gesturing towards last year.
Um but I don't know, may maybe this is in the path.
Maybe maybe this is just a temporary thing. >> Yeah.
And and and uh you know, if you look at the SpaceX deals with Google Anthropic, they were they weren't like five-year deals, right?
They were shorter term opportunities for both sides to get out.
And I think that Meta could easily do something like that where they could make, again, this is like the practical decision, and say like, "Hey, we actually do have way more capacity than we need.
>> We plan on being able to utilize it fully over time, but we need to get our products sort of ramped up."
And so, in the meantime, why not >> sell that capacity and signal to the market that we're not entirely irrational? >> Yeah. Yeah. My um Yeah. Tyler, what's up? >> Yeah.
I was going to say it's maybe a comparison to Apple here, which is like I I think Meta can actually wait until like the the features that they need to implement are like extremely obvious, right?
Like Apple waited a long time to actually implement these things even though everyone was like basically begging.
I I don't know if people are like begging for AI features in Instagram and maybe that'll happen in the future and they can just basically just wait while like, oh, we're not really sure how to implement this stuff.
Yeah, you can put in the search bar or whatever, but it doesn't improve the experience that much.
But maybe you know in a year or two there's going to be some feature that like wow everyone is really wants this in Instagram by then you know they'll have all the compute necessary they can uh you know 90 days before they implemented they they can you know get out of the the lease or whatever. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's interesting.
I feel like they just need to do more product experimentation.
Like the core the core Instagram team they launched the the what's it called? Glimpses or something.
It's like a shorter even shorter version of stories like lower uh it it like sits in like the little sidebar of the chat like they are launching different features across the family of apps but that culture like it feels like they have a research organization but they don't have an AI product organization that's actively productizing things as quickly.
I mean metavibes for you know even though it was like this white label of midjourney was uh well at least it was launched fast and at least they got the feedback. >> Yeah.
I mean, >> I would have liked to see a Meta Vibes level effort like once a month.
>> Facebook has I I don't think or like Meta whatever.
Um I don't think they've ever been like the the company that like >> really innovates on on product, right?
There's going to be some >> some feature that everyone's like, "Wow, this is really great for AI and then they can then just integrate it into all their apps.
They have all the capacity to serve it by that point." >> Yeah. I don't know. I don't know.
I don't know where it goes.
Uh Amit is investing uh over there shares his perspective two perspectives on the meta news.
Uh he says bearish the bearish take is if meta has excess compute that they are willing to sell via a new cloud business.
Doesn't that mean we aren't compute constrained?
Isn't this really bad for Neoclouds?
Why would Meta give a deal to Core Weever or Iron if they just sell the compute themselves?
Furthermore, wouldn't they cut capex because idle compute as the basis for a new business means they don't need as much compute as they bought, which means capex should come down.
That would be bearish for all semis.
The bullish take is if Meta is building a cloud business, even if they are using idle compute, which means they aren't compute constrained, they might end up spending more on capex to compete with GCP, AWS, and Azure.
and Azure. uh like if they realize that selling computing services on top of a meta cloud is better than just ads then wouldn't they end up having to spend in the same way that Google Microsoft Amazon do in order to build out a full cloud business they do have a lot of
capabilities in terms of spinning up data centers quickly uh maybe not quite as quickly as SpaceX and AWS but they're certainly like near the frontier of that capability in terms of putting up GPUs and tents um so more capex would be good for semi so what do people think where do we land on this. The market is
The market is certainly reacting positively to Meta and negatively to the Neoclouds because there's a new competitor in town.
Um anyway, >> Sephur and the Satrini team are going pretty hard.
They say LM AO Zach finally takes the L. Okay.
So, if this is a if this is a metaverse style side quest and the and the super intelligence metatraed models are the VR of this cycle for Meta's attempt at a new business creation.
Uh, and the meta train models get sort of mothalled in the way that the Metaquest and the VR strategy got mothballled.
Um, what is the meta raybands of MSL?
raybands of MSL? like what would what would remain because when they wind down one of these projects sometimes you get a meta ray bands which is pretty good business and growing and and cool and like there's development there but it's a much more narrow focused and I would say image model but they they seem
>> wouldn't it just be this like neocloud business >> maybe yeah >> that's what's going to stay on and it's likeable >> fun is Ray-B bands though I want a consumer product it's a consumer company >> yeah and it's interesting because you can you can make the case that Meta could build an amazing inference business. Yeah. Right. Because Yeah. Right.
Because they already >> uh they already serve millions of businesses globally. >> Yeah.
>> And uh they could make a pretty compelling case for how like, hey, we help people acquire customers and we help people deliver products and services over here.
>> Yeah, we've talked about that before.
>> Yeah, we've talked about that before. I don't know that I buy that that the fact that they have like you know every single mobile gaming company in DTOC e-commerce business on is actually flows over to well now get your tokens from us like >> yeah just I just I just think that like
people have it in their head like okay Meta is a consumer business >> right it's thought of as like a consumer business but they have massive sales teams account management teams they know how to get in front of customers they've got to the point where, you know, again, they they're not operating a commodity business, right? Having their,
Having their, >> you know, social networks cloud is is closer to one. >> Mhm.
>> But anyways, I'm interested to see.
I'm I imagine they'll have to come out with uh their own kind of news around this pretty quickly so that they're not sitting in limbo with just one kind of >> rumored article floating out there and and people are speculating.
J Khan is saying Meta falls out of the AI race.
He's over at Catrini as well.
Um, too soon to say that probably they still have a bunch of amazing talent.
They certainly have a lot of GPUs >> and you know >> Elon >> getting into the cloud business.
Certainly he was not seeding >> the AI race, right?
I think he seemingly is as motivated as ever to um to do what he can to win or at least be a player.
It's just it's almost like the curse of size or something like when you're a trillion dollar company there's probably a world that the meta rayband display is a good example of like or meta raybands good example of like there's there's probably a piece of consumer hardware that's AI enabled like the ring or
something where or uh or just getting really good at voice models or just getting really good at image models and if they're a little bit more narrow and constrained they could probably completely dominate that but trying to do super intelligence and and coding agents and it's a little it's a little scattered potentially. Uh Serenity says
Uh Serenity says there's a lot of disinformation going around about meta cutting capex because they quote overbuilt.
This is an if they have excess capacity and it looks like the opposite right now.
Hyperscalers like Google are so much are so compute constrained that they have had to cut allocations to meta back in March since Meta was using too much for internal projects.
Meta was immediately constrained.
So it looks like they were forced to immediately sign massive $ 48 billion contracts with Neoclouds like Corweave and Nebas.
Uh Meta is selling excess capacity if there's any especially since their large contracts are take or pay from the Neo Neoclouds.
Yeah, this all could just be like a a potential um like you're laying the groundwork in case you wind up in a situation where that is where the value is occurring.
That's where the advantage for Meta is.
So there certainly is a uh uh a positive thesis there.
Uh Jay Yun says, "We are still massively short compute.
Meta and XA are selling compute because there's no inference demand for their models.
It's a compute allocation problem.
Too much compute in the hands of players with no internal use for it, not a compute surplus problem." Interesting.
Well, uh we can continue to cover the story. >> More meta news. >> What is that?
Apparently, according to Bobby Allen over at NPR, that considered buying Kowi before it's developing its own prediction market app that is uh sort of a classic >> meta playbook.
Um, >> this sort of puts to bed your theory that uh they might be just making a a you know based cloud-based prediction markets where you compete for your ability to see the future.
>> Um I uh Manifold is that right? >> Yeah.
>> So it's like a that's like a pretty big platform. >> Yes.
But I was saying there's a chance right now based on the reporting that it could be the manifold strategy or it could be the polymarket call she strategy.
And the fact that they didn't try and acquire manifold they tried to acquire Khi sort of signals like hey they're probably going the the uh financially incentivized route.
financially incentivized route. uh which I I think fits with your thesis that you know it's inconsumer it's profitable and growing very fast and also TK from KHI was taking shots at Instagram saying it's brain rot saying that like every minute you spend on KHI is a minute that
you're not spending brain rotting on Instagram which is like okay I think a lot of people would say that these are like equivalent or maybe one is worse than the other but you know that's a way to get attention >> don't you think that uh so so the potential pool of profits in prediction markets and and sports betting broadly. I think
I think >> in the last year was itund Tyler can you check?
I think it was like 160ish billion of like trading >> volume that is not at all equivalent to revenue obviously. Yeah.
revenue obviously. Yeah. Um but it doesn't uh it feels like again it's not a space that uh it's a space that has consistently had many many many players wildly different than you know Meta's core >> social networking business and I just
wonder is like is the potential profit pool risk the attention >> that worth the risk of all the attention you're going to get from lawmakers globally >> by integrating >> integrating like betting into the product that is already >> under attack on like a million different fronts, right? It feels like
It feels like >> with the movie coming out and stuff, it's like you're jumping straight to the >> It feels like you have a golden goose, right?
And [laughter] the goose is getting valued, right?
The goose is getting going back.
I'm going to just keep going back to the slides.
>> You love these slides.
>> Um the goose is valued.
It's producing golden eggs.
And you see another golden egg, but it's almost like a poison golden egg.
And if you bring it over, it might to the farm, it might kill the goose. Okay.
>> Might kill your your main goose >> potentially.
>> And so it feels feels risky. >> Yeah.
I I just sent in >> the true value is really the power.
This is uh the rise of American gambling.
These are losses by year.
Uh in the United States, it's now almost at $250 billion.
So I wanted to think about getting into gambling.
How what's the correct gambling strategy? And I got one. I got one.
So you go to the Monarch Casino and >> wait, Americans are losing 240 >> billion a year, I think.
Or maybe this is Is this is this cumulative?
No, this isn't cumulative.
This is this is per year. I don't know. >> I don't know. I just saw this image. It's high. It's growing. >> Doesn't look good. >> Doesn't look good.
Uh here's a gambling strategy that uh might work out.
Not financial advice, but the Monarch Casino in Resort.
Uh if you this company went public in 1993 and if you went to the Monarch Casino Resort and every week you gambled a $100 on their stock by buying the stock over the run just gambling $100 a week on their stock from 1993 to today.
You would have put in $174,000 and it would be worth $3. 3 million.
So just depends on where you want to gamble.
>> Gamble on the stock potentially.
It's a fascinating company.
Golden Door Motel, familyowned. They have two assets.
They have two They have two casinos.
And this company is just uh absolutely printing. 36% Ebida margin.
Uh and uh they buy back stock and they also pay a dividend.
It's just two properties, Reno and Blackhawk in uh where's Blackhawk in Colorado.
And they've just grown this like small chain of casinos.
And uh then the stock's done very well. So, own the house.
Don't bet on the actual casino. Stay out of the casino.
Stay in the stock market potentially.
Um, anyway, um, moving on.
Uh, Google Gemini, there's some news there.
Google AI overviews decreased uh, outbound organic clicks by 40%.
Eric Suffort is sharing a new paper by researchers at Carnegie Melon in the Indian School of Business uh, finds that AI overviews were triggered in roughly 41% of observed Google searches.
and when triggered reduced outbound organic clicks by about 40%.
That seems like one to one.
Uh the presence of AI overviews increased the likelihood of a zero-click search by roughly 35%.
Everyone is going uh everyone's going Google zero at this point.
And uh the uh the founder Josh Marshall of talking points memo wrote about uh Google AI oligarchy and the end of the open web.
It's an interesting read but u [snorts] we go through it another time. >> December 2010. What happened?
>> Demis was scraping together a couple million bucks >> for a small company called Deep Mind.
>> This is uh for a founder that just like, you know, had their >> uh started their career in the last few years, this is like in inconceivable.
>> They're like, "Wait, you mean 2150, right?"
It's like no sold half the company >> at 5 million post >> as one of the most elite.
>> Can you imagine what technologist in the entire world >> if it stayed independent this whole time? I don't know.
May maybe there'd be another another path or something.
>> You're saying they sold too early?
>> It seemed like they sold too early. I don't know. I hard to say. Hard to say. >> Paper hands. >> Paper hands. Pete >> paper. [laughter] Oh, no. No, no, no.
I think all the VCs didn't want to sell especially because the whole Google thing that was like the whole story was uh was don't sell to Google.
Google's like the bad one.
Uh which is funny because like Google's been very responsible and you know great great company.
Um I was I was playing around with V3 or V4 where where are we in the VO models?
Um so good and yet still not indistinguishable from reality.
Uh, we're we're we're so so close and yet so far if you want to generate a a video these days.
Um, it is cool you can do it on your phone though. I like it.
>> Where do you want to go next? >> We joining in.
Mark Pinkis is joining us in just a few minutes. So, we'll bring him.
>> Millennials be like, "Norm McDonald is funny."
Then you watch some of his videos and there's no Metaglasses pranks, no Vine Boom sound effects, [screaming] no meme clips intersperse, no undisclosed gambling ads, >> no Dexter background music.
>> I don't know the Dexter background music thing.
I'm not online enough for that.
>> I think you would you would probably recognize the sound.
You probably recognize it's just kind of like meme background music at this point.
>> Yeah, Dexter background music. Get this out.
>> Bullpen is planning his bachelor party for November.
He's not getting married.
Just feel like the fellas need to let loose a little. >> What's that? >> Interesting idea. Interesting idea. >> Which one?
>> Christopher Nolan went to an AMC Burbank 16 fairly often. Team loves it.
We're seeing the new Nolan movie. We just bought tickets.
We got a crew assembled for uh the Odyssey. We're very excited. Look at this.
Just blowing up his spot a little bit. >> Yeah, really.
Let the man just enjoy a >> a film.
>> A film and a a big bucket of popcorn.
Let me tell you about MongoDB.
What's the only thing faster than the AI market?
Your business on MongoDB.
Don't just build AI, own the data platform that powers it.
Uh our next guest is Mark Pinkis, the author of life at the speed of play.
He's with us in the TV Ultradom.
Welcome to the show, Mark. How are you doing? >> I'm great.
Good to uh meet you guys >> online virtually.
Thank you so much >> after a whirl whirlwind media tour.
>> Yeah, >> I feel like I feel like you probably have worked through like all your your best bits at this point and this is going to be this is going to be the finale.
Uh or or >> we can play the hits.
We can go a different way.
>> I want to play the I want to play the hits. >> Okay. Okay.
Where do you want to start? >> Uh no.
But where where should we were supposed to be the the very first one I know we were travel it was on us.
No but but uh I hope this is the first of many.
So it's great to have you on. >> Yeah.
Uh I mean let's start with the book.
Uh I want to know like before the actual uh before the thesis came together like why write a book at all?
Are people even reading books these days?
Like we we see these charts of like books just falling off entirely.
Um, what what what was the uh is it about >> author should do that?
They should have they should you should put something in the book that's just like, "Hey reader, I want you to pause for a second.
If you ever meet me in person, I will ask you for the code word. This is the code."
>> Easter eggs reward you for making it this far.
>> And if you tell me I love your book, I will ask you for the code word.
If you don't >> Oh, there you go.
[laughter] Um, but yeah, I I I I want to hear about uh just the general motivations and the general uh >> I think everyone should I think you should >> build a house and write a book one time cuz neither one >> ends up feeling like it was, you know, the right return on the investment of time, but it's >> but you have this passion in you and you should be all in and get it out. >> Yeah.
one time and this is my one time I I had I'd say that there was just a lot of lessons and a whole playbook built up across five companies and in building Zinga and I give I created a course at Stanford Business School and Stanford CS and I give this advice over and over to
founders and even people running companies at scale and I just said I might as well get in a book and I I'm I I that my reference was 0ero to one Peter Thiel's book and I thought it's a big reach goal but if if my book can be referencable 10 years later like that then you know it's of use. >> Yeah. Where do you think you either >> Yeah.
Where do you think you either differ with the 0ero to one uh thinking?
Do you think it needs expansions, updates?
Like what uh what needs to be added to the cannon that isn't in zero to one?
Well, like what [clears throat] what to actually do.
So, >> I mean, that's a good point.
>> 0 to one is I just reread it a year ago and and it motivated me again.
And I was like, "Oh, yeah.
I love the moral arbitrage and the monopoly."
And it's these big ideas that you love and you can repeat, >> but it's not a it's not a how-to guide or a playbook.
And I think so many people have ideas and they either don't pursue them and I think in this new world AI that's a shame because the the bar is so low >> or they they do and they fail for the wrong reasons.
I think you guys have probably seen this too.
So many people who they have a great idea but it's buried in a losing product.
And so the the core thesis that >> I've been saying over and over to myself and other people across my career is that that it once you realize that you have winning instincts and you've attached them to losing ideas, it changes everything.
And that's how you change your odds of success. >> Yeah. Yeah.
I've heard that a A+ entrepreneur with a C++ market or C++ opportunity >> or a B+ idea >> is the enemy of an A because it's good enough to get funding and get a team.
And >> yeah, it's funny cuz when I was when I was uh like around maybe senior year of college, I was working on a product and I felt like I was getting like two different types of advice.
Like one is like don't listen to anyone.
Just like you know advice is worthless.
Just like do do and you'll and you'll figure it out.
And then uh and then and then on the other side uh you know people are giving you know advice and and sort of playbooks.
And I distinctly remember one meeting that I had where uh somebody who's now a friend was like you're super talented.
Uh this idea like it's okay but it's not great and it's going to hold you back from your potential.
And I and I just like didn't fully listen but it's just stuck in my head uh >> since that point. bad, right?
We see founders who are talented and they are just sticking with an idea that's just not quite right or not that good and it's because there's something in their gut that they know is amazing. And that was me.
I mean, >> I talk a lot about in the book that I, this is not a humble brag, okay? I managed to fail.
I created one of the first three social networks, Tribe. net. Yeah.
And there were probably 10 launched in that two or three year period including Facebook and MySpace and Tagged and Bibbo.
Eight of the 10 probably made it were successful on some level.
I was probably amongst the two that weren't.
And so it took an act of willpower to fail and and I had that much will.
I was I was so determined uh to to stick with this one losing idea that really by the time I got to Zingga, I was just not going to do that again.
And and I think that's a big message in the book and I think it's I I still need to hear that message today because we fall in love with our ideas. >> Yeah.
>> How much uh like to you what is the balance between some ideas like I I find this in consumer like quite a quite a bit more than than enterprise because it typically is a lot more defined.
But in consumer like there's ideas that I've been pitched and I'm like that's a terrible idea and then like the founder you know uh just does it and it and it totally works and and sometimes it's unpredictable and I think you can like >> tune your intuition like quite a bit but it can never be like 100% crystal ball.
You just know exactly whether an idea is going to work or not.
going to work or not. like what is your what has been your framework of uh yeah like what's the point where you're like I'm not a 100% sure this idea will work but it's worth putting in the 3 weeks or 3 months or whatever time is necessary
to actually get the reality check to the idea >> well I think that we have idea veins or instinct veins and so there's a zone that you have an instinct around and then I have this framework proven proven better new, which is a way to kind of derisk that and keep ourselves out of trouble. So, it's like just narrow down
So, it's like just narrow down where your idea is new or novel and wherever it's not, look for what's already proven and copy it.
And and people like Nikita Bear have really really been good at that.
And you know, they're he's done kind of the same product over and over again and it's worked each time.
worked each time. So I think that at least means you're not going to fail for the wrong reason and you get a lot more shots on goal you and the whole and in consumer even you know much more than enterprise it really is if you test more ideas in a week than the industry you're
in in a contest in a year you probably have a four or 5x advantage you know higher odds of success and I'll also say that the reality in consumer is, you know, where you see traction there's a good idea and where you don't see traction there's not a good idea. And
And >> and that might sound kind of dumb, but you know, I find in consumer you could back a you're better off backing an unproven entrepreneur who's found for whatever reason product market fit than a proven entrepreneur like me with no product market fit.
And that's just, you know, that's an unfortunate reality.
Uh, >> I have a bunch of questions.
>> I have I have a I have a fun thought exercise.
exercise. So, so I John and I have had this debate of is it possible to build a competitor to Instagram >> and and I think that uh I would like to see someone someone try because I believe the capital markets are in a are in a state right now that you know even
though it's insane and there's like you know 99% chance it doesn't work like there's going to be people that would take the bet and you have Instagram which is one of the most popular products in the entire world and the company is like very focused on like other things, right? Like they're
Like they're focused on AI and and now a cloud business and and uh maybe the company overall doesn't fully appreciate just how amazing the business is.
Um and it and it still continues to grow.
And so I want to believe that it's possible to for for a smart team to actually go and uh and and create something that would actually compete in that in that category.
John is like it's just not possible. It's over.
It's like you know network effects and the scale and and the social game that it's turned into.
But I want to believe I'm curious what your view is.
Well, one of these instinct veins that I talk about is the cocktail party and and originally like there was a cocktail party on Napster and then there was a cocktail party on Friendster and then Facebook and now Instagram.
And it once the cocktail party is there and working, it is hard to get people to move.
But these cocktail parties can wear out and and kind of lose their excitement or appeal.
And in the case of Instagram today, I think it's lost a lot of its original value to us, which was social networking.
It was the the kind of serendipity that we get at a cocktail party.
And they for maybe business reasons, you know, they pursued engagement.
They want to be more like Tik Tok and get you be more entertainment reals.
And so I do think that that opens up an opportunity.
I I I don't know if you guys um spend much time thinking about net promoter score.
It used to be really popular NPS.
And there's a funny thing you can you could go research this now or maybe AI could simulate it for you even quicker.
But I would bet that that today users of Instagram probably have an NPS of 35 and the day they quit it's like quitting cigarettes.
It's probably a minus 35.
That's usually the sign of some weakness, you know, in your product or brand.
Looking at that, >> you know, on the exit, you know, >> they're not promoting it.
In fact, they're proud that they've given up this bad habit.
And what I would say though is there probably has to be a >> the only thing the only thing it's it's a it's a small sample size but the friends that I know that quit quit Instagram they end up still sending me memes from like their business accounts and I'm like all right I [laughter] get it.
They can't give up the addiction. >> Yeah. Yeah.
I think they're actually like they're they're signaling that they've quit but but they're they're still like you know having a cheeky drag here and [laughter] there, you Well, I got to say I I got my drags down to like I probably use Instagram once a month >> and then I find myself just drawn into time wasting. >> I'm on Twitter or X.
That's like my >> social network, my drug of choice.
>> Um I I tell myself it's more valuable content, but >> you know, that's what we do.
>> I look at it as like it's an opportunity to do an you know that whatever the inverse of a meditation is, right?
in a meditation, [laughter] you're sitting there, you're like, >> I'm going to let the thoughts I'm going to let the thoughts flow through, but I'm not going to hang on to them.
You know, whatever whatever your approach is.
And and it's like, what if you could add 20 new ideas to your head every 10 seconds?
[laughter] That is why you do that.
>> And it's like, here's here's drone warfare and here's a protest somewhere else and like here's some startup who's rage baiting you.
You know, it's >> but uh it's addictive, whatever it is.
But I would say that it's probably you need a shift.
You need something new, I think, to get consumers to get all of us.
We are lazy and apathetic and low attention span.
And so, you know, no one's downloading new apps.
So, there has to be something probably AI and agents that >> that is the new thing that pulls you into a new cocktail party. >> Yeah.
I >> But I do believe it'll happen.
Even though I'm I'm like skeptical about the particular go to market, I'm curious on your read on the state of venture capital because if you go back to 0ero to one, the sources of monopoly power, network effects are one of the four.
They're they're very enduring and everyone believes that network effects will endure even in the age of AI.
And so I guess I have been surprised even though I can't think of how to disrupt an established social network.
I've been surprised that we haven't heard about a $1 billion pre-market round.
So that's what I'm saying by the venture capital community to actually buy their way into network effect.
>> Yeah, you can build a new social media company, but you need billions of dollars and like Tik Tok is evidence of that.
Tik Tok was spending how much money on Meta, how much money on on Snap, all these other >> platforms.
probably the biggest advertiser on the internet for a while. >> Yeah. Yeah. For for a minute there.
And so I do think it's possible.
>> I think they were getting their users, you know, from social networks. >> Yeah. Yeah.
But >> but I would just say your question on venture capital, why aren't we seeing this funded?
I think you got to pull the camera back and just also say we're not seeing a lot of consumer being funded.
It it almost feels like it's not investable right now.
I think Y cominator probably less than 10% of their companies >> are consumer >> but I'm investing in some consumer but it's after I see traction >> and it feels unpredictable and completely uncertain before there's traction.
So I just think >> distribution is pretty broken even though AI feels like a new platform at a consumer level it's not.
We have kind of a portal in GPT, but we also have to remember like we're so early.
GPT is a single player experience, right?
There is no multiplayer version of cloud or GPT.
>> There is no app >> connection, you know, there's >> none of the things that enabled Zingga, you know, or MySpace was started, I mean, uh, YouTube was started on top of MySpace. People forget that.
So there isn't an obvious way to jumpstart distribution and I think you know VCs rightly want to see something predictable and so the small number I a company called FOMO announced a big round last week and I invested in that along with Union Square Ventures I only invested after they proved it and got the traction. >> Sure. Yeah.
How how do you think um vibe coding, agentic coding is going to change or is already changing game development?
Because it feels like we should be seeing AAA games produced by solo developers.
I don't know if that's more of a VC backable strategy or opportunity, but uh it feels like we're very very close to some inflection point there.
The indie gave indie dev community is already booming, but uh how do you think it'll play out?
Like a thousand flowers bloom, >> happy bar simulator and >> the simulators are fun, but yeah, I'm just wondering if you think that there's like a business opportunity there or if it will just be uh more like the DTOC boom where there were a ton of small brands, a couple breakouts, but by and large it was just that oh there's a ton of, you know, solo entrepreneurs on Shopify today and that's great, >> right?
It's it's a it's a $280 billion industry that doesn't seem to have any innovation.
>> You know, there I think games have gotten really boring and have kind of stagnated and and I think it's because distribution's broken.
>> Will AI change distribution?
>> Probably pretty on a pretty small level.
The only place I think it could is enabling um much faster testing of ideas like what some of the hyper casual game companies like a company called Raleigh that Zingabot was brilliant at that.
So they they would say what was tick tockable.
So they would figure out what's a tick tock meme.
They made a game in a week called high heels that became the number one game in the app store. So that happened.
I don't see anyone really using AI effectively to do that.
So then you get to well okay AI can reduce the cost. Sure.
And I think it is making headway in reducing the cost but I don't think >> you get hits in games because of less cost.
You get hits because of more dimensions you can innovate on.
Um, and so I think do think AAA, you know, will come >> down from 100 million to maybe 30 million, >> but but I don't I don't think that's going to spark growth in the market.
It's so fascinating that I can't think of a single even media asset, game, anything like that where uh AI created the hit factor that whatever like the we we we go back to the Harry Potter Balenciaga video that was one of the first AI videos that really went went super viral and people were like, "Wow, this is actually entertaining and interesting." >> Yeah.
And it's always like the human that used the AI to do something that they wouldn't have done. >> Yeah.
>> If they had just had an idea pre AAI because it would be like, well, I'm not going to pay for all the CGI to do, you know, >> it would have just been way too much work.
>> But, right, >> the human still is the hit maker. >> Yeah. >> We still got it. >> Yeah.
And even if it's it's awkward because when we were doing, you know, games, there was Flash, we were doing web games, and we were able to innovate and test really quickly and put things out in a day or a week.
And now in the App Store and Unity, it's slower.
But AI is really well suited for web languages, you know, and web gaming. Web gaming is 1.
9 billion out of 280 billion.
So, a lot of people are betting that 3JS is going to unlock innovation and growth, but you're going to have to see people embrace web gaming, which you know is a tough bet.
So, >> what do you think how how how would you how do you think Apple should approach vibe coding?
>> It feels like an interesting interesting challenge.
They're kind of I don't think they necessarily know at least they have they don't necessarily know how they want to approach it or they haven't made it clear yet.
They've made it hard for these >> apps to you know I think they kind of froze updates on a bunch of apps and said like you know which is basically like saying like your business is like over until we figure something out.
So clearly they want to make money from it and they want to protect users which I think are both you know developers are going to be annoyed at at uh or at least good developers will be annoyed at at both of those things.
But um it seems like a tough one where users are clearly going to want modular software that they can create and multiplayer experiences that they can imagine and then share with friends, but it feels like it's at odds with all of Apple's kind of principles. Yeah, 100%.
I mean, I I don't think that there is a real incentive for Apple to do anything about that.
And I don't think it doesn't feel like that's not the energy I get from Apple.
That's not the the vibe is vibe coding. >> Yeah. >> Um >> Yeah.
and and I I don't even see Apple doing anything to help distribution of the apps that, you know, are put out on their platform now.
So, I don't think I I just I have a hard time seeing them motivated to help, you know, people put out tons more apps.
I mean, I think it's more likely that that log jam gets broken because somebody makes an app container that somehow, you know, Apple allows people to keep changing massive amounts of change of content inside.
I mean, almost like a Roblox, but um it's yeah, it's I it hurts my brain to figure out how that's going to happen. and and vibe coding.
I actually I'm I think claude code, codeex, I think I think automating coding and using co-working agents has obviously you don't need me to tell you that has legs.
I think that's going to go somewhere. >> Yeah.
But but vibe coding almost feels like the missed start we had with blogging and geo cities where there was a moment where everyone was going to make their own website and they did and then they just weren't very good >> and it didn't go anywhere.
There was there weren't really websites that blew up. >> Yeah.
>> That I know that were built on top of like a geocities or maybe I'm dating myself.
You guys don't even remember those. >> Yeah.
We we are like it feels like we're very close to being able to effectively vibe code an iOS app in the cloud, have it deploy it to test flight and you get that app back on your phone and close that loop entirely on your phone in an Apple compliant way.
Now, it couldn't go viral because it's not in the store.
viral because it's not in the store. you might be able to have your agent go and submit it to the store and wait two weeks um and then it gets out there which might be an acceptable flywheel for some developers but um it is like the technology is going to get there quicker than the distribution I and like
the ideas I think I think you're spot >> and the ability to test I'm also surprised >> this far into this AI cycle that >> if I would have thought >> that the first thing we'd see is kind of top of the funnel massive testing of, you know, using ads and >> links and things and and tell your agent to spend all night testing and come back in the morning with the winning variant. And I don't even see a I don't know
And I don't even see a I don't know about you guys, I don't see even one successful company or service offering that.
And I don't find any founders doing that.
It's more >> you can build something in 3 months kind of that would have taken a year or two.
So, so it's more of I can get to my prototype faster, but not not I can test a lot of ideas faster. >> Yeah.
Speaking of ads, do you think hyper casual games should be allowed to advertise with fake CGI versions of a different game to promote the install of their very basic probably pick three game? >> Wow.
And now we're getting to at a toss level, should they be allowed?
At a morality level, I I'd say >> it's it it I I don't like it.
I mean, I think it's >> it's misrepresenting, you know, it's I I wouldn't mind I wouldn't blame Apple for taking somebody down for that um >> because it's misrepresenting things. Yeah.
>> It's a bad user experience.
Now, what I would be okay with is what we did in the beginning of Zingga is I would go I'd put up a link for some amazing new game you want to try and it would go to 404 page not found because I was just testing for heat and interest. >> Yeah.
>> So I or eventually we got more sophisticated and say you know >> we'll you'll be the first to know about this game.
You know, >> I had I had an experiment record the fake game, have it have an agent vibe code you a real version of the fake game because a lot of people they want to play the fake game, but the fake game doesn't actually have the the flywheel of you will keep playing it.
You'll play it for a couple minutes and then you'll get bored and so they have to funnel you to something else.
Jordan, >> I had a product in college.
I was taking a lot of film photos and there was like it was a 30-minute drive to the closest place to get film developed reliably and I was quite frustrated by it.
So, I wanted to make like effectively a subscription service.
They would send you one or two rolls of film a month and you just send it back and they would develop it and upload it for you and whatever.
And uh to test it, I just like ran a bunch of Facebook ads at a landing page and >> I actually got I think I had like a $15$20 CAC or something at the time.
Facebook ads were a lot cheaper back then. Yeah.
>> Ended up not pursuing it, but uh I just refunded everyone like obviously right afterwards cuz I wasn't offering I wasn't able to offer the service.
>> I was just like, "Hey, sorry, like you know, we oversold or whatever, but uh be best way to test something." >> Yeah. >> Back to the book.
Uh Peter Teal did an uh a Reddit AMA after 0ero to1 uh launched and someone asked him what is the Straussian reading of 0ero to1 and he said don't become an entrepreneur [snorts] which is a very funny response uh what is the Straussian reading reading of life at the speed of play >> I I would not to be uh you know read completely a carbon copy.
But I would say I would say don't don't become a product founder.
>> Um don't do it if you want to make money.
Like don't don't go be a product founder if you think this is uh the best path to be, you know, rich and successful because it's I end the book by saying how ambitious are you?
how ambitious are you? and and a lot of you know everyone says I'm an 11 on a 10 scale right but then the question is well what the flip side of that coin is what are you willing to sacrifice to get to that place would you toil in obscurity for 10 years in order to have
an 80% chance of the greatest home run you know of your life or would you take kind of an 80% chance of a first base hit in one to two years and most people would take the latter and that's that's why they stay in their jobs or careers or that's why even once we go found a company I think we make all these compromises to derisk it. >> Yeah. >> Yeah.
>> Um >> is that the correct question to ask to assess someone's level of ambition?
Should you ask them 80% chance of a home run in 10 years versus you know 20% chance of base hit or something like that or sorry vice versa or or are there other Yeah.
that those are good odds.
Um but uh or are there other questions that you can dig into when you're talking to a founder to actually assess their level of ambition?
>> Um I think you can pretty quickly, you guys seen this too, get get a sense of what's motivating somebody and and why they're doing this.
And I think I think that the best founders have a passion for this that that goes beyond this one business or opportunity.
and they they need that because it's probably going to fail.
And so I think that there's a question like why why are some founders repeating success and some have you know one big success and I think it is like your kind of commitment and willpower and and if you have if if if you're more committed to because there's we've talked about founder mode and there's all these moments where I think as a founder we we have to have real courage but it's not courage to go against the world.
It's usually courage to go against our own team, our own investors because we've promised them things.
We've built expectations with them and now we have to tell them we are wrong. >> Yeah.
>> And you come in on Monday, you're like, we I just saw another product the competitor had last week and what we're doing is totally wrong.
And people have complained working with Mark is like third grade soccer.
Every Monday he wants to chase another ball.
And they're not wrong a lot of the time because >> I'm trying to be intellectually honest and I can burn people out that way, you know, but it's because I'm more committed to winning than I am kind of harmony or even >> keeping the this team with me.
Um, and so I think that's more of the thread that I look for is do I see that this person is more motivated by taking the hill and winning than, you know, being liked or respected. >> Yeah.
>> Yeah. It's so it's so interesting because you have I've been in that mode too where third grade soccer strategy where and I think that comes from like fundamental knowing that what you're working on is there's something wrong with the idea >> at least in the early days for me
because like with with t with with with our with our with the podcast early on >> even when we literally had like a hundred viewers I didn't have that I didn't have that like third grade soccer strategy Y was just like I this is a good product and I know because there's
people I trust that uh are not lying to me and they say like this is great keep doing it and so like we had the blinders on but I've been in that mode and in hinds where you're just kind of like oh like let's try this other variation of this thing or let's you know we need to go in a totally different direction and
that was it it it comes off as scattered but if you're able to admit that it's it's more like you need to be intellectually honest with yourself and your team that you're scattered because there's something that's fundamentally off with the approach, >> right? You knew that you liked this
You knew that you liked this product that you I mean I think and and feedback loops you got from people around you like you felt good about it and they liked it.
You're like, "Okay, if it's not catching on yet, >> I think it's a marketing question and a patient's question."
That's different than you kind of feel in the pit of your stomach like it's just not that good.
And I think a lot of times we're so hopeful about a product we're building and then when we finally see it, it's usually never as good in code as it was in our mind. And and what do you do?
I mean, that's happened to me so often in games that like this will be so cool and then we build it like ah or we see a competitor who has that and I want to send them a thank you note because I'm like thank you for building my bad idea for me.
I'm definitely not going to do that now.
And but when you it's kind of like love, you know, finding your partner when when I think when you do find the person, you're not asking is this right?
You're not asking other people, do you what do you think of her? You know, >> totally.
>> You mentioned a bucket list.
Everyone should build a house.
Everyone should write a book.
Uh was taking a company public on your bucket list before you did it?
Did was it appropriate to have it on that list? What was that like?
Well, this is the second company I took public.
I had a company called support.
com that I took public >> in 2000 on the last day of the IPO window because it was >> because it was enterprise software. >> Yeah.
>> Our VCs had no interest in the company until >> the consumer fell apart.
You know, we had 170 million in bookings.
We were able to go public.
>> Um >> I I think it's a false dream.
I mean, I I and and I think I even felt it a little bit then, but I for sure by the time I got to Zinga, I didn't want to go public.
We were forced to go public.
We we were incredibly profitable.
We had over a billion dollars on our balance sheet when we went public, but we were forced because of the SEC rules, which Obama changed with the Startup Act.
And there's all this pressure because people want your stock and they're finding ways to buy it through side letters.
And then that's exposing you.
And there's all kinds of things.
We're seeing it happen now with Anthropic.
And you write really, really mean letters and policies scaring them and saying like Anthropic has that we're not going to recognize your stock if it wasn't issued to you.
>> But in the end, >> you still the SEC is going to see you as responsible for anyone who bought it.
So anyway, we were forced to go public. So was Facebook. So was LinkedIn.
this other class of companies like Stripe have put it off for years for good reason.
Anyone who tells you that there's anything that's going to help your company about going public, I think nine times out of 10 they are lying to you.
Now SpaceX and you know these large cap >> AI companies, they want legitimately need access to capital markets and so they are optimizing for that.
If you don't have that need for capital market access, there is no benefit. It's only bad.
In fact, you have so many employees who leave because they say, "Yeah, I always wanted to be at a company went public.
It was on my bucket list. Goodbye."
And so, [laughter] you give them this liquidity, you know, you give them this >> thing on their resume.
And and so now they're gone. Your culture changes. Ours did.
And now, you know, Michael Dell once told me before he took his company private and then public again that the biggest reason to go private was to control communications with his employees because he said, you know, they they get their views from stock chat rooms and what their family is reading and and not from Michael Dell.
And so it's no there's there's it gives you like five other jobs as a CEO that you don't need like you should be focused on your product, you know, customer product team, not investor, IPO, you know, media.
>> Yeah, makes a ton of sense.
Well, the book is life at the speed of play.
It's available everywhere. Books are sold.
Go pick up >> on the launch and uh let's do this again soon. We we I have a million. go all over the place.
>> Yeah, there's so many more topics >> to get into. >> This would be great.
>> Yeah, I'd love to talk about my broken internet strategy of public stock investing, which >> Yeah, we didn't even get to Snapchat.
>> Yeah, we didn't get to Snapchat. That's a whole show.
>> Yeah, that's a whole show. Let's do it soon. >> Come back at one.
>> Maybe have me and Evan on together.
We can debate like whether you know this this whole journey into AR goggles is is the best thing.
>> Shareholders love the specs.
>> [laughter] >> shareholders really love this facts.
>> We'll get to the Well, thank you.
>> No, I mean, wait till we see how many sell.
I think, you know, I'm I'm pricing in I'm pricing in 20 I'm going to I'm pricing in 20 pairs. >> 20 pairs. >> But I think it could.
There's a chance that it surprises to the upside. >> It could. It could.
Anyway, thank you so much for taking the time to come chat with us.
Have a great rest of your day.
>> Great to see you, Mark.
>> We'll talk to you soon.
>> Let me tell you about the New York Stock Exchange.
Want to change the world?
Raise capital at the New York Stock Exchange.
>> [laughter] >> Mark just gave the anti- ad for going public.
>> Hey, if you need to raise capital, if you want to raise the most capital, you got to go to the New York Stock Exchange.
That's the endorsement that we're proud to give.
Our next guest is in the waiting room.
Uh Shub Shinha from Integral is the co-founder and CEO. Welcome to the show. How you doing? >> I'm doing okay. Thanks. Thanks for having me. >> Just okay. Just okay.
>> On this big day, [laughter] >> I'm uh I'm riding the highs and uh and the lows.
and getting getting back up right now. So excited.
>> That's that that's pretty normal for the entrepreneurial journey, but uh take us through your entrepreneurial journey. How did you get here? What are you building? What's the news today? >> Yeah. Yeah, definitely. Well, I'm excited.
Uh today we actually just announced an $18 million series A for uh for my company, Integral.
And so the gone, it was a good warm-up hit.
Had to get the real hit in there.
We like [laughter] to warm up the gong on this show. >> Double hit.
I don't think we've done that before.
>> There's a warm-up hit and then the real hit. >> Yeah.
Yeah, that's what >> that was special for integral.
>> So tell us about integral. >> Yeah.
So what integral does is we sanitize proprietary real world data sets such that AI builders can get very bespoke, very sensitive data sets.
>> Um but that data holders can also make sure that privacy and compliance is adhered to.
And so this things this looks like medical records, financial transactions, etc.
You know, a lot of this contains the real world human behavior patterns that people like you and me have.
And there's a ton of individuals and enterprises who are now monetizing it since the AI companies and the AI builders want it.
>> That being said, there the the builders want the signal.
They don't want the secret values.
They don't want the the the proprietary secrets, so to speak.
And so integral sits in the middle where we ensure that through privacy engineering both with our privacy teams and our engineering teams we can retain the utility and the signal while also ensuring that privacy and regulatory and contractual. >> Yeah.
So how about this for an example?
There's there's been uh you know there's been examples of of you know a company buying a company just for the data around how that company was operating like just for the slack.
But then you can imagine as Slack there's so many things >> that uh so much information in Slack that again you talked about as signal but not necessarily information that should be available for even people let's say working at the labs to see right that's like >> PII etc. That's right.
And and folks at the labs don't even necessarily want to see that, right?
They want the context of it all.
And so, it's a real win-win for data holders who want privacy and trust and also revenue.
And then the lab uh who or or the AI builder who wants to ensure that they're not stepping into anything they shouldn't be stepping into, but they get that value.
>> What are some types of companies that have valuable data that that don't know that it's valuable and it would be something that they could monetize if they were, let's say, working with you? >> For sure.
And and that's that's one of the bets that we're making that there's this new proprietary data economy of individuals and enterprises.
And so we've seen kind of all across the board just given the the kind of newness of the economy, the types of data sets that are coming in and the bespoke demand.
So we've seen uh for example like mid-market hospitals that see compressing revenues but have a very very specific treasure trove of data uh because they focus on a rare disease or a specific procedure and and that's not available anywhere else. fitness apps.
Um, some people, you know, they log their entire lives into fitness apps.
And these apps have free or paid users.
>> They're only making money off the paid users, but they can then those apps can then monetize what is that entire real world signal and really continue to make that app free and introduce a ton of value.
Um, and it all becomes circular because as AI gets better, a lot of these same companies will actually use it. Sure.
>> So, it's a real win-win there.
>> What's the state-of-the-art in uh sanitization, maintaining privacy?
We talked to Ed and Tai from the National Design Studio on Monday.
They uh shipped a something like less than 15 meg like small language model for sanitizing uh documents in the browser runs very efficiently.
Uh are you just throwing open source models of this?
Do you need frontier models for data sanitization?
And then is there some worry where it flows back if you're using some closed source model and the frontier lab takes the data that you sent them and and stores that improperly? >> For sure. For sure.
And and there's a variety of solutions out there mixed with call it human services and entire teams of PhDs looking at it.
>> Might just be like reaxes, right? Right.
Like if it's a phone number, identify it, just turn it into X or number number sign or something like that. Right. >> That's right. That's right.
So there's a ton of solutions that kind of do that first layer.
I think where Integral really specializes is, you know, we got our start healthcare and healthcare has all proprietary data.
You know, your doctor should not be putting your internet on or your data on the internet.
And to and as far as we can tell, they're not >> I told my doctor, go ahead. >> Yeah.
because it would be embarrassing for everyone else if like your your lean muscle mass and your body fat percentage got leaked out there.
Everyone would >> if your if your test levels leaked on the internet, it would it would be it'd be crazy.
You'd be getting accused of doping.
>> Um >> uh are you when did when did you make the switch from AirPods to to wired?
>> I'm also a wired a wired headphone guy, so I'm I'm I'm curious.
I hit number five on air replacement and then I went wired and it turns out so I'm I'm in New York and it turns out it's a fashion statement as well.
So I'm I'm kind of rocking both sides.
>> I think it is uh entirely superior and and that is even before the fact you can get like a bunch of pairs of wired headphones, have them everywhere >> and uh for the cost of just one pair of AirPods.
So >> maybe maybe >> we're we're ahead.
Uh congratulations on the round.
uh business makes a lot of sense and excited to see where you go go with it.
>> Yeah, we'll talk to you soon.
Have a good rest of your day. Goodbye.
>> Let me tell you about Cisco critical infrastructure for the AI era.
Unlock seamless real-time experiences and new value with Cisco.
Our next guest is Wayne Tang from Lime coming in [music] on IPO day.
Wayne, how are you doing? Congratulations. >> Welcome to the show. >> Thank you so much. Thanks for having me.
uh talk to us about the journey to get here today. What does it feel like?
What's going through your head right now?
>> It's been a it's been a long journey and I I feel great to see Lime go public today and I think >> yeah, >> it's it's certainly not been a linear journey.
I mean, as you guys know, there's been a lot of companies in microobility >> and Lime is the last man standing in a very tough industry.
And I think we're the only ones that have built a scalable, sustainable, profitable business.
And I think that's why we've earned the right to be a public company today.
And I feel like um to see Lime trade publicly was a validation of the hard choices we made along the way, but also a lot of sacrifices to get Lime to this point. >> Yeah.
What uh what changed culturally recently or what is the culture like?
because it feels like the key to this business is operational efficiency, uh, excellence, not having a ton of side quests. You have to be focused.
This is not a business with some, you know, [clears throat] just crazy you struck lightning 25 times in a row and and you can just make a ton of mistakes.
Like operational efficiency is key to the business. Correct.
>> You're absolutely right.
It's a I describe it as it's a game of inches.
I mean, our average vehicle is generating $7. 50 of revenue a day.
>> We have to charge the vehicle, fix the vehicle, m use spare parts, >> make sure it's positioned the right place at the right time.
And we do all that and we generate a 50% plus cash margins on that $7. 50.
And because we're able to get that level of margins, we pay back our vehicles in less than one year.
When you're talking about a relatively low price point product, small mistakes very quickly adds up and the and the business becomes upside down, which is what you see most of our competitors.
Yeah, >> they and it's not for the lack of capital.
A lot of our competitors raised more money than we did.
They were in the market longer.
>> And it's obviously hard because if it was easy, they would have done it too.
And I think it also requires a clear a clear view of like what actually matters.
And in the world of limited resources, we are very focused that we want to be the way to crack this business is great hardware, great software, great operations, government relations >> and then everything else we have to dep prioritize in a incredibly strict way in order to put our limited resources towards the things that actually matter in this business.
>> What is going on on the supply chain side?
Is there a is there a constraint on uh battery capacity because of demand from AI broadly?
It feels like the AI industry is sucking up every possible piece of the supply chain from you know coatings that go into toilets to everything that generates power under the sun.
Rocket motors and and uh jet engines are being bolted to the ground to generate power.
Is that a is that a constraint or is there an opportunity that demand for energy will ultimately uh reduce the price of batteries or maybe even extend their life? >> Yeah.
So I haven't seen a shortage on battery cells to date, but I think one of the advantages that Lime has is we are vertically integrated um in hardware and software.
So we have every ebike e scooter you see online we have designed engineer inhouse.
We control our own supply chain.
We outsource the manufacturing.
But because Lime is the world's largest purchaser of ebikes, e- scooters, it also means we get um we get warning when there are shortages of critical parts and suppliers want to sell to lime.
So I have seen this year a shortage and a inflation in um memory chips.
I mean clearly AI has driven up demand on the high-end memory chips.
We don't put the AI chips into a line bike or scooter, but I think a lot of the supply chain has reoriented [laughter] towards manufacturing the high-end.
So even if you're using a >> middle of the road or low-end memory chip, we're seeing significant price inflation.
But more importantly, if you don't lock in supply, you're not even there's not going to be any supply to be bought in 2027 2028.
But because Lime is the global leader in microobility, our suppliers are coming to us early and saying how might we work with you to secure supply for next year and let's lock in prices now before the kind of um price inflation that we see.
And I think that's one of the advantages of being vertically integrated.
But even this is a it's a real game of interest.
We have to we have to look ahead on not just what's going to happen this year, but what's going to happen in the future.
The other supply chain um challenge we we navigated this past year was liberation day.
So the president announced a series of tariffs and some of these tariffs were 150% on some countries.
But because lime controls our own supply chain prior to 2026 we started to diversify where we are doing our manufacturing.
In fact, we stood up full manufacturing capacity in three different countries.
And what that allows us to do is depending on the policies of the day, we could work with different vendors to ensure that not only do we have the right supply, but that we are optimizing for the um any sort of tariff um headwinds that we see.
If you're buying offtheshelf hardware from the same Chinese manufacturer, these are not tools in the box for you.
And I feel like a lot of our competitors really >> couldn't navigate whether it's the tariffs or any sort of component shortages in the same way that lime can.
This is also where scale matters.
We are in a winner take most market similar to Uber and Raicher and Door Dash and food delivery and winner takemost market.
It's great to be the winner and that's lime.
It sucks to be second and third place because you don't have the same reliability, the same scale to invest in software hardware capital expenditure and you don't have the scale to actually build proprietary hardware.
It doesn't make sense to build your own scooter and ebike if you only have a fleet of a thousand vehicles because you have to advertise that RD cost over a much smaller fleet.
We're able to have a independent product strategy because Lime operates over 300,000 bikes and scooters in 230 cities, 29 countries around the world.
That scale Vantage only accelerates now that Lime is public because we have more capital to invest in the business.
I think we realize it's important to be vertically integrated.
We realized the importance of scale and we built a business to capture those competitive advantages early which is why Lime is here and most of our competitors are bankrupt or not doing very well. >> Yeah.
>> Uh if you could rewind to the early days during the height of the competitive dynamics between you know you and Bird and and other players, how how would you have knowing everything that you know now?
What what would you have done differently?
[clears throat] I I think there's lots of small things I would do differently, but I think the overarching strategy it was the right one and I think it's proven out by um Lime's um going public today.
I think it starts with I remember early days of lime and people still have this debate in Silicon Valley and it really is a false choice which is is growth more important or profitability more important and that's not really you need to get your unit economics right to earn the right to grow rapidly >> and the incentives in the early days were so that it really incentivized the wrong behavior because nobody was making money.
the only way to survive is to open up incremental venture capital.
And when venture capital firms are saying that what we're going to value you on and what we're going to give you money on is growth, it incentivize companies to chase after unprofitable revenue and frankly unsustainable growth even if it doesn't make financial sense. >> Yeah.
And that would be even like markets markets that turned out to not be a great fit for this type of mobility solution.
Is that is that like an example?
Because I imagine like there was just pl like like LA is an interesting city because it's like so dominated by >> by cars and it feels, you know, anyways and I just remember when I I moved to LA during the the the early days of this like of the war that you guys had during the heyday of like Bird Graveyard and and all those accounts that probably made everyone's life a lot harder.
But it felt like if you're just chasing growth, you're going to go into markets that you know are not even that great because if you don't get that revenue growth, your competitor is going to and they're going to be able to raise more capital, etc. >> Capital fight. >> Exactly.
And in fact, one of the first things I did when I became CEO is shrink our footprint.
>> Because I mean, if you're if you are running a coffee shop and you were losing money at every cups of every single cup of coffee, you should probably sell fewer cups of coffee and figure out how to make money before you started opening up new coffee shops.
And that was the reality of lime eight years ago.
I think I want to say our gross margins were negative 300%.
Every dollar of revenue, we lost 300 bucks.
It was like before we think about growth, let's fix that.
We should be making money at the trip level, at the scooter level.
So we shrunk our footprint, focus on the things that matter, fix our unit economics and but and then really accelerated growth once we got that right.
And I think the companies that really had a growth at all cost mentality even when it doesn't make financial sense actually raise more money for a period of time but the law of economics catches up to everybody.
You can be economically irrational for a period of time but you can't be economically irrational forever.
Even the dumbest VC at some point figures out the game.
And I think when the when the irrational funding left the industry, that's actually when I think Lime's competitive strengths really became more obvious because we were not competing on our ability to raise more capital and to burn it faster.
We started to compete on the quality of our hardware, the quality of our operations.
And I actually think >> getting past the hype cycle was a major reason why Lime is here.
If we're still in the middle of the hype cycle, then we'll be on that treadmill of crazy growth.
Burn all this money to raise more money to burn more of that in order to raise more money.
And I think that's a losers game. >> Yeah.
>> Congratulations to the whole team.
I'm sure when when you took the job as CEO, maybe eight out of your 10 friend closest friends were like, "You're absolutely crazy for taking that job." But uh you did it. >> You got it here. >> Very cool. >> Congratulations.
>> I actually was texting with her the night I got took this job.
I was having drinks on the rooftop of a friend's um house and I was there with six friends from Uber.
>> Every single person is like, "This is such a dumb decision.
[laughter] It's a no-win job.
You will never be able to turn this around.
You should have never done this.
You locked yourself into a trap that you can't get out of."
And I just recall, I mean, the fact that you mentioned that, I recall this conversation.
I was texting with that group of people being like, "Remember what you said to me?" >> Contrarian. Contrarian.
And right >> the victory lab.
You deserve a drink on top of a roof deck. Hopefully, you got one.
I'm sure it's been a long day.
>> No, I I literally knew. I knew.
I was like, these guys, I'm sure around a lot of smart people.
It was very contrarian to to to go and do this.
And uh congratulations on, you know, an incredible moment. >> Thank you so much. >> Thanks so much. Really appreciate it.
And congratulations on all your success as well.
This is a >> great podcast.
Really, really appreciate it.
>> We'll talk to you soon. Have a good one.
>> Let me tell you about Railway.
Railway is the all-in-one intelligent cloud provider.
Use your favorite agents to deploy web apps, servers, databases, and more while Railway automatically takes care of scaling, monitoring, and security.
Our next guests are from Assort Health.
We have the co-founders and co-CEOs. Coco Alert. How you guys doing? Welcome to the show.
>> Hey, >> introduce yourself for everyone. Love the cowboy hats.
>> Jackson, can you grab mine?
>> Yeah, we got to get some cowboy hats.
>> Get as many as we need.
Maybe get John the bear mask.
I don't need that bear mask. I'm not a bear.
>> We We love that you're in J andJ as well.
We always We were our slide tack is at JJ.
You guys tell us about the company. Tell us about the round. I want to hit the gong. Tell us what's going on. >> Sweet. Yeah.
So, uh we're John and Jacko CEOs uh of Assort Health.
Uh we are an agentic platform for the entire patient journey for provider groups.
So, healthcare providers.
We do everything from work call center automation, voice AI to handling facts and document processing, patient intake forms, um, care gap activation and payment collection.
So, >> we have a bunch more questions, but tell us how much you raised.
We got to hit the gong together.
Double gong for no together. >> Together. >> Together.
Tell us how much you raised. >> $222 million total.
millions of patients in the next few years.
So, we're super excited about that. That's that's a signal. >> Thank you.
>> Uh, wait, when did you guys start the company? >> 2023. >> 2023. All right. Not bad.
Just a couple hundred million of value creation annually. >> I like it. >> Yeah.
Take us through t take us through the actual uh the customer journey. Who's buying?
How do you interface with both the doctors, the the patients, the hospital networks, and the insurers?
like healthcare is like famously a sevenparty negotiation for everything, but how do you how do you actually sell to and how do you flow through?
>> Yeah, I'll let Jeff answer that. >> Yeah. >> Yeah.
In terms of how we actually approach these provider groups, it's it's I think when we first started the business, it was actually educating the market on voice AI agents.
Like when we first started, it might have been too early, right?
It was no one else was really thinking about this in early 2023.
And I think the landscape has now completely evolved where all of our customers and partners, they know voice AI agents really well.
They understand like they have this burning need then they're really eager to adopt, right?
I think the big difference for us now is um we're really overarching as John mentioned a gentic platform for every part of the patient care navigation journey.
That's really our huge you know durability and differentiator.
durability and differentiator. It's like you've all experienced this having to tell your story over and over over and over again with the health care system like why I didn't remember that like the patient like you feel invisible as a patient right >> so really with our assort synapse model which is now powered by over 190 million
patient facing interactions super proprietary data that our agents are generating to feed back into our product and agents to make the next interaction more concierge and personalized um and then also the fact that every product talks to each other right if you engage with our voice AI agent inbound and you book your your appointment through us. When we send you those patient intake
When we send you those patient intake forms for consent and everything, it's going to be 70% prefilled.
And it may also recognize like, hey, you know, John is eligible for colonoscopy colonos colurectal screening.
Let's get them through that, right?
And that's intend to take care of your health, right?
So, like got to be really preventative with these things.
Uh, and then also be like, you know, instead of getting a paper bill, it's going to surface that payment right there to be like, you have this outstanding bill, right?
And then let's say on that first inbound call, you're like, you know, you we'll remember that you prefer Monday mornings.
We'll remember what type of voice you like, what tone you like.
For us, it might not be, you know, we won't the next call with the agent.
It's not going to repeat itself over and over again.
For more elderly patient, it is going to proactively repeat their Medicare number back to them to address how to get there.
So this level of personalization per patient and really the kind of durability that we build across all of our products talking each to each other where it's like I'm never going to turn off iPhone because I have iMessage, right?
Talk, you know, that's what we really want to build with patient journey memory uh to really uh create the best experience possible for our patients in our in our practice.
>> What what uh what flipped in the procurement process over the last few years?
cuz I mean if if we were doing this show and you're building in healthcare, you know, 5 years ago, you guys would be doing this round after like 12 years [laughter] or something like that and you probably have less revenue.
You know, it just it just was always like every healthcare founder would be like it's an insane slog.
>> Uh and now that's clearly flipped because you guys are growing super quickly.
A bunch of other founders have been been on the show saying that there's like such insane pull.
It's just the magic of of AI and and it's real.
Are there any other factors at play? How do you guys see it?
>> Yeah, it's really interesting.
I'd say there's like two components of market and then of course our unique approach.
Um in terms of the market, um if you talk to any of these provider groups, it's really it's challenging, more challenging than ever to run a business in healthcare, right?
You're seeing revenue actually go down every year from reimbursement from insurance costs are going up because the cost of working with payers, the cost of administrating healthare, it's literally going up 20% year-over-year, right?
So, they're in this one of the hardest businesses.
Every single admin labor person they hire typically has a 40 to 50% turnover rate on average, right? Per per year.
So, they're just in this really tough position as a business and as a market.
Um and in the past 10 12 years if if you talk to any of these provider groups CEOs they have not really seen any change to their technology stack it's been pretty static.
A lot of existing partners have not really innovated in the space because there hasn't really been much appetite or hunger for like AI right historically.
And so with this technology you know it's really mind-blowing.
We work with like groups across the entire country, over 200 customers, and like we'll fly out to like rural parts of Idaho.
>> Thunder, [laughter] >> and they will literally like hear our demo and be like, "This is mind-blowing.
Like, this technology is going to change and transform my practice.
Patients will no longer have to be in a hold for 30 minutes, right?
They can actually finally get access to care.
You know, elementary school teachers working from 8:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m.
can actually like get access to care after after their work, right?
So stuff like that really heartwarming to hear.
>> So yeah, that's been a really inflection point in the market. >> Sure. >> Awesome.
>> Congratulations on the round.
Thank you so much for coming on the show.
>> You guys wear the cowboy hats normally or just for fun?
>> We wear to our board meetings, all customer events.
Uh we just had a huge customer event in Soma last week. We we we went all out. So I love it. It's the Asian cowboy. It's very memorable.
You know, you got to >> It is. It is.
You got to be being quirky. It's your edge.
>> Yeah, it's your >> love it.
Well, >> gentlemen, cheers. It's been an honor.
>> How [laughter] are you? >> Have a good one. Cheers. >> See you out there. Goodbye.
>> Let me tell you about Console.
Console builds AI agents that automates 70% of IT, HR, and finance support, giving employees instant resolution for access requests and password resets.
Our next [clears throat] guest is Elliot Pence from Dominion Dynamics.
He's the founder and CEO.
[music] >> Welcome to the show. >> Hey guys.
>> Sorry, that's a special sound effect.
It's very [laughter] dramatic.
>> It's very dramatic, >> but we're making >> But I feel like it's fitting. It is fitting. Let's do it again.
>> Welcome to the show, Elliot. >> Welcome to the show. How are you doing? >> Love it. I'm great.
It's hard to follow the Asian Cowboys, though. >> I know. Tough act. Tough act.
Well, we'll hit the gong even harder for you.
>> Yes, we'll make it up.
>> Tell us about yourself.
Tell us about the company. Tell us about the round. >> Yeah, for sure.
So, we just raised 100 million.
Uh company is called Dominion Dynamics.
It's focused on we're bu we're building a a Canadian neopime.
So we connect autonomous systems.
We're focused on domain awareness in the Arctic.
>> All software or hardware as well.
>> Soft software and hardware.
We've built 10 things, five hardware, five different platforms.
Uh and we're about to build a a big drone.
>> Why is that not why why is that not crazy?
Like building one thing is hard.
Building 10 things, five things like that that that feels like like you know obviously hundred million dollar series A it's great but like you know isn't there value to focus.
Why is this industry different? >> No.
Look the opportunity in Canada is not to focus.
It's such a wide opportunity landscape.
Canada used to have a very rich and deep defense tech history.
you know, you you can track it back to Canada and Bombardier and they have all these companies.
First first autonomous submarine, first uh two operational drones, first passenger jet and then we basically went on a starvation diet.
So there's talent in tech here, >> but we've not actually had a large prime for some time.
So I think actually the the the opportunity is to basically do a land grab and but to do it with software, not just >> kind of one specific thing.
So like in the US, yeah, there's 970 companies that have been backed over the last six years, but in Canada, it's a G7 country without a defense brand. That's insane. >> Yeah, that's crazy.
Is uh is the in America, Palmer LK's talked about how uh the government does not want Anderal to be a monopoly.
It can be a great business.
It can be a big business, but if it gets to be the only supplier of something, the government will say, "Look, we're going to give a contract to someone else because we want a diversity Of course, the government's not going to want to have a monopoly. That's not the point.
Like the point is have the best capability. Yeah.
But it is likely that some of those companies will build the best capability.
And if they build the best capability, they should have a monopoly. >> Okay.
[clears throat] >> How are you how are you thinking about uh you you guys feel uniquely, you know, situated to be able to dominate in with like Arctic capabilities.
How big is the opportunity outside of Canada in your view? Yeah.
So what we want to build is a global company.
We want it to be a Canadian company headquartered in Canada, majority owned, majority controlled, which it is.
>> Uh we think it's a huge opportunity.
What we're really building is not just Arctic, right?
The reason we're starting in the Arctic is it's the harshest operating environment in the world.
But the other reason is because you have to architect solutions very differently. There's no comms.
The hardware situation is insane because power doesn't work.
The ground what they call breeze because of the tundra.
So it like cracks and breaks. So runways don't work.
Uh if you're building drones, you've got to go 5,000 kilometers.
So like it's basically like building for the moon.
If you build for the moon, you will build massive modes because it's the hardest thing to do.
>> Um in terms of uh Canadian ownership, what does that look like when you go out to fund raise?
I see Valor Equity Partners at Trades, Bessemer, uh amazing funds.
I think of them as American funds.
funds. uh is do do you draw the line around G7 investors or is there is there a broader scope that you can think about or or do you think about cap table construction one way or another >> 100% we talk about and think about capable construction we've been super
intentional about who we bring in so we wanted to have pension funds in >> sure >> Canada has two and a half trillion under management by the Maple 8 so we brought two of those pension funds in Exactly [laughter] um [clears throat] BCI and uh just for the for the pensioners. >> Let's give it up for the Canadian
>> Let's give it up for the Canadian pensioners. >> It's fantastic.
>> But you know those those funds like Valor and Trees invest, they're all global funds, right?
They have mandates to do global investing and we wanted the best of the best.
So >> we went out and got the best of the best. >> Very cool.
Um what what have been the biggest breakthroughs since you were on the show last I think it was January of this year? >> Five months.
Well, we did a 5,500 kometer snowmobile operation across the Northwest Passage with Orinet, which is our our kit, our back end. >> Yeah. [laughter] Yes, exactly.
Across the Northwest Passage.
>> Wait, and is that a snowmo a drone snowmobile or you guys are like >> No, literally snowmobiles.
Dudes on snowmobiles for 3 months >> across that testing out the communications back end. That's very cool. I love it. >> No gong for that.
[laughter] >> We'll hit it again. We'll hit it again.
>> Tremendous tremendous progress.
Um, great to have you back on.
Uh, and uh, >> you're you're you're coming on at a good clip.
So, I I I'm confident that we'll see you again this year.
>> And you know the name of the you know the name of the communications platform, >> Ara. It's called >> Aura. Aura. Wow. Powerful >> or farming. That's good. I love it. very on trend.
Uh, thank you so much for coming on the show >> and happy Canada Day, guys.
>> Happy >> Wait, it's Canada Day? >> It's Canada Day. We got TO HIT THAT G. >> WOW. [laughter] FOUR.
>> Everyone who's listening, please text Jeremy Gon. Happy Canada Day.
I'll give you his phone number right here. It's 29. >> Who? Oh, wow.
Canada into the round of 16.
>> We're hoping to follow you.
We're hoping to follow you guys in there >> later today. Yeah, exactly.
>> And thank you so much. >> Well, thanks guys. >> Yeah, great talk. Cheers. Have a good one.
Let me tell you about Shopify.
Shopify founded in Canada, Canadian company.
Shopify is a commerce platform that grows with your business and lets you sell in seconds online, in store, on mobile, on social, on marketplaces, and now with AI agents. Uh, good news.
We [music] got to do Canada Day Canada deep dive.
I'm glad we got one Canadian on the show.
But up next, we have an Italian, Luca Ferrari from Bending Spoons, the co-founder and CEO. Luca, how are you doing? Welcome to the show.
>> Hey guys, nice to see you. Thank you for having me.
>> Thank you for coming back on such a great day.
>> Great to have you back. >> How's it going?
Where are you at mentally? Are you relieved? Are you excited? What's it like?
>> Just another day, John. Just another day. >> I'm I'm exhausted. [laughter] >> Okay.
>> You know, I'm an I'm an extreme introvert and there's nothing worse for an extreme introvert to do a road show uh than a media day.
[laughter] >> Well, we appreciate >> Well, we can just hang out.
We'll keep this we'll we'll keep this casual.
We'll pretend it's just the three of us catching up. >> Um >> yeah.
What uh how was your approach overall?
We had um when when Clarna did their IPO, it was literally they had a handful of people on the team.
I think it was like sub 10 people.
>> They dropped into the stock exchange.
They they did the IPO and they and they just they left like you know the next day.
What's been your what's been your approach over >> because it's a company building moment.
It's a celebration, but also it can be exhausting to fly a whole bunch of people around the world if you want to do that.
>> I think we've we've done probably the opposite.
We NASDAQ told us that we broke a record by bringing over 500 people.
Pretty much everybody who could fly on nothing. >> That's awesome.
[laughter] >> No, it's been wild.
I mean, look, we are a very competitive group and we're already >> if possibly even more motivated than we were before, but >> at the same time, it's it's good to pause for a second and and acknowledge the this milestone. It's not easy.
So, you know, happy for it, but also just hungry to show that this is just the beginning. >> Yeah.
What was the oneliner that resonated on the road show most bankers and investors who are trying to get their head around the company?
I mean the financials, okay, good.
So that helps >> when you double the company pretty much every year for for as long as I can remember that that goes a long way uh getting people to to like you.
No, I mean jokes aside, I think the >> you have to ask the investors.
Every person is different.
In my opinion, what people liked about us is a combination of a a technologically advanced platform uh where everything is highly integrated.
We're pushing AI to its limits which is obviously the promise for the future and how companies get to be run.
Um and at the same time a track record that shows a combination of we are willing to uh make aggressive moves uh whether it's in acquisitions monetization but at the same time we invest just as aggressively uh and in a far-sighted manner on on product having you know added a ton of features brought innovation to product that sometimes >> hadn't seen it in a long time.
So that combination I think is unusual and the and we see a huge pipeline of acquisitions out there.
So I think that that was quite resonant with the at least the best investors.
>> How crazy is this as a reason to be excited about what you're doing?
A lot of the companies there's a lot of fear around AI disrupting uh tech companies but a lot of the companies in your portfolio have survived the >> mobile apocalypse and the cloud apocalypse.
apocalypse. And so you have a number of of of organizations and and brands that are just resistant to sudden disruption from the new hot thing in a way that a company that was started in the pre-Chat GGBT era might not be quite equipped
might still be in the hyperrowth but then there's a newer thing whereas a lot of your companies have maybe more resiliency built in just by virtue of the fact that they are maybe over five over 10 years old at this Is that realistic? >> Absolutely. I think the I don't think we >> Absolutely.
I think the I don't think we have any significant business that's uh that hasn't been around for at least 15 16 years.
Uh >> on the one hand, you know, they're not going to go to the moon, you know, uh which is bad.
I'd prefer it to be the case.
But but on the other hand, yes, they've gone through so much and the customer base is uh is so self- selected at this point. Yeah.
Uh it's a huge advantage.
advantage. you when you bet as a VC for example on a fast growing company uh of course that's exciting but also you need to believe that growth will stay that company typically is the you know end of one offering that product or that product in that way so as competition uh
comes up you don't know what's going to happen you haven't seen it happen before but for AOL or Eventbrite or Vimeo we have seen it all like they've had basically they've lived in a perfect competition kind of environment for a decade plus so plenty of clones emulators of those kinds. So, you kind
So, you kind of know what you get and there's value in that for sure. >> Yeah.
Um, are you getting calls from VCs who are trying to offload shares or whole companies of zombie corns?
There's a article in the Economist this week about zombie corns, companies that were valued at over a billion dollars and uh have not raised an up round in years.
Uh, what kind of deal flow is getting pushed your way?
And then what are you doing with that deal flow?
Is it interesting or not?
Yeah, look, we we we look at every it's like you got it.
I mean, it's a particularly good time for a serial acquirer.
There's a bit of dislocation uh fear fear due to disruption from AI which I think has a lot of truth to it in many cases.
Uh it's a bit nuanced but um and we can only do so one of the disadvantage disadvantages of our model where we almost rebuild uh some of these business from the ground up.
We try to keep everything that's great and rebuild everything that's less great.
It's I mean the good thing is I think it's much more challenging and interesting than than going a little bit more shallow and also it's delivered very high returns but but at the same time you can't do it a million times a year.
It takes a lot of time a lot of effort from a big team of engineers, designers, product managers and so on and so forth and so we have to be very selective.
So yes it's a good time with a lot of opportunities but equally we we can only do a few.
So, uh, the key is, you know, listening to what's available, the opportunities, but also not get too excited.
Stay patient for the right one. >> Yeah. More than 50 deals done. >> Yeah.
How much of an advantage is is being public going to actually give you in in net new acquisitions.
I imagine a lot of acquirers are going to be uh you know it's potentially a lot more compelling to get you know if they're going to sell to you to get um you know depending on whatever the cash equity debt split is to actually just have exposure to something that they feel like can compound while having access to liquidity. >> Sure.
>> I think I mean you may be right. We will see.
Of course it's you know day one in that regard so I don't have a track record.
Uh we we chose to go public primarily to improve our access to debt.
It turns out that lenders really like lending to private public companies, better regulated, more externally transparent.
They like valuation, all things a lender loves.
And you know, historically, if you look at our the capital we have deployed, it's been um like 80% directionally uh from debt and like 15 20% free cash flows.
Um, so it's important for us to to have access to uh that dollars and and cheap that that if possible and this should help on the margins a little bit.
Um, but yeah, I I think you're right that we may find opportunities that uh wouldn't have been available to us uh had we stayed private.
Do you think any of that new debt market access might unlock sort of like a white whale acquisition, some mega deal where you're taking down a company that it fits the thesis but is much larger than anything you've done in the past?
Look, I I would say I believe that as a good strategy is predictable to some extent and our you know our predictable strategy is do three, five, eight deals a year of uh uh relatively speaking the same scale more or less and it's going to grow as we expand.
But uh but yes, that's an upside.
That's a cherry on the cake.
That's uh you know, I'm sure that in time some something like that will happen and we'll try to move quickly and seize the opportunity.
So yeah, possible, likely no, possible, yes.
I think if you look at uh this over enough, you know, long enough a period of time and it's almost guaranteed to happen before later. >> Yeah. What Oh, sorry, Jord.
>> Do you think uh how how do you how do you think about people's like nostalgia around software products in general?
around software products in general? I feel like uh we were talking with Scott Galloway yesterday for his podcast and he was saying that he's quite excited about Bending Spoon specifically because he was like they're great brands that people have like positive association
with and uh in fashion everything that's old and uncool eventually becomes cool again right I would say like uh you look at an an example of you know one of the hottest brands in the world chrome hearts right has gone through periods where it wasn't the hottest thing uh but then it you know and these things go in cycles. So, like I can imagine a world
So, like I can imagine a world where 5 years from now every Gen Z kid is like, "Oh, of course I'm using AOL."
Like, it's like it's like, you know, it's like vintage and it's like cool and nostalgic and like the and so I can imagine like at some point uh and it feels like software is going the way of of of fashion where it's like fashion, you know, it's very easy to make a new fashion brand, right?
like it's it's very easy to go compete with a Gucci or or a legacy brand, but um but there's some there's just brand value is like a real thing.
Do you see a potential where where you see a reaceleration or or renewed cultural relevancy in in any of the brands and or is that not something you think about at all?
>> I I would say it's possible.
It's not something we would embed in a business case.
We we we we're kind of math, science, and engineering people.
We look at the numbers and try to make sure that we base our capital allocation on uh assumptions that we can be close to certain about.
Uh and I would say what you just described is plausible but does it happen when it's so again you know maybe we'll try to make these products uh >> better to the best of our abilities and if that helps uh ignite some of that we'll you know we'll be incredibly happy but even if it does our investment thesis does not hinge on on it.
So >> yeah, I mean certainly could be true for Vimeo.
The community there has always been uh very culturally different and like anti-brain rot.
You don't have a lot of like YouTube style slop on there. >> Yeah.
I I associate Vimeo with like quality >> film making and it's still right like when I think about my favorite surf movies growing up, they were always always there.
Snow, you know, snowboarding, all all these different kind of niches I was into.
Like the quality was >> going there.
>> going there. Um what >> by the way on that one quickly I I I I agree we have uh some surprises in store for for that community on be there's they've they've I think that they've been uh a bit frustrated over time whe I I can empathize with the direction
has taken which is it's been more like enterprise and it makes sense I mean but >> we'll see whether we can do something for them that they like Um uh I don't know if that will turn out to be a success but yes I I I do think there's potential there for sure. >> Yeah, a lot of people have fond
>> Yeah, a lot of people have fond memories.
Um on uh on AI we've seen a lot of engineering organizations sort of like take out the biggest hammer.
>> Wait, are you talking about advanced Italians or artificial intelligence?
>> Artificial intelligence.
[laughter] I know that you deploy a lot of advanced Italians, but I want to know how you're deploying artificial intelligence.
Uh, obviously your operating team is fantastic, but I imagine that your operating team is also fantastic at making sure that you're not token maxing and overspending that you're if you are using a coding agent, you're using it judiciously.
What have the learnings been?
Have you been on as much of a uh as a as much of a roller coaster ride as some of the bigger tech companies?
We've seen headlines out of Uber where they spent so much token maxing they spent their whole budget then they had to pull back.
There's been these back and forths.
What's your journey been like at Bending Spin? >> Yeah, totally.
So, but by the way, we have more people in the States than in Italy, I think, because we're based in Italy.
It's a little bit like it's it's it's unusual and so it's cool that in the Italians or what not.
And I'm I'm Italian, but yeah.
Anyway, we've got a bunch of Italians. That's true. But not just Italians. >> Sure.
[laughter] Just as many Americans. >> Just to be clear.
Um, in any case, uh, yeah, AI, I mean, almost nobody knows that my co-founders and I had an AI startup in 2010. Massive failure.
Uh, [laughter] >> and we raised a million dollars, which at the time felt like a lot.
Today, it's basically, you know, like nothing. >> No, that was a lot.
So, Demis in 2010 raised$2. 3 million at a five cap. >> Yeah.
>> So, like that's and that's like the most elite AI scientists in the world at the time. >> Yeah. That was the market.
It did much better than we than we did at the time on AI.
I'm sure is more competent on AI, but we I mentioned it because it's certainly something my coounders and I have been passionate about and try to use as much as possible in the business.
We've had it as part of our proprietary technologies for almost a decade.
I think 2018 certainly we're using machine learning.
>> Um so, so yeah, we push it pretty hard.
We we actually don't have any limitations on using AI at the company.
We encourage everybody to push uh the envelope there, but we have very limited cost.
And the reason why we have very limited cost is that we have developed a ton of uh models in house.
It turns out that if you have very good people, you can build narr.
They're pretty dumb in general, but they can do that one thing pretty well >> and they're very cheap.
They're self-hosted basically.
I mean almost free just a little.
And then you know there are good open source models you can fine-tune combine.
Again, um they may not be as good as the frontier models, but if you use them intelligently, we have built our own uh AI orchestrator that will help us make sure that uh for each task we're using the you know models that are optimal in terms of cost quality.
We don't end up using the frontier models for a whole lot. Yeah.
Just either the more complex stuff or supervision of uh uh of more dumb models.
And with that we we are pushing pretty hard on AI.
We're last, you know, as per our disclosures, we are over 90% of our code being written by AI and uh pretty modest expenditures.
So, we're pretty happy there. >> That's yeah.
Yeah, that's fascinating.
Um, what how do you see the the footprint expanding uh for the company post IPO?
You mentioned that you have a lot of employees in the United States.
Do you expect to uh spin up more offices, go more regional, uh centralized, decentralized? What's the thesis there?
I think we'll I mean the the the trend is one where we open more offices and uh also ultimately our our basically a key way we we do well is by by creating this core team of exceptional people >> uh giving them a lot of responsibility, powerful tools and a culture that helps them be a little bit better than they would otherwise be.
And uh and sometimes we we acquire companies that have failed to attract some of the best for a long time. Not for anybody's fault.
Like sometimes management teams are great.
It's just that if the brand is not as appealing, you just don't attract the right applications.
And so we we we we by injecting some of that talent, we help reinvigorate those organizations, bring back that we call it startup mode, you know, high talent density, more intensity, ambition, innovation.
Uh and and basically we look to to hire as many great people as we can and from wherever they are.
uh historically just out of you know like simply where we were based and are based it was like Milan, Italy and then London and now again the states and and Madrid in Spain, Poland anywhere we can find great people who are excited about uh what we do using tech to reinvent how businesses are run and take a lot of responsibility much earlier in their careers than would appear reasonable. I think that's us.
Uh so yeah probably more locations not fewer locations going forward. Makes sense.
>> What uh do you track average timelines from first conversation with a management team to to close?
Like I imagine there's some companies that you've acquired where you're talking for for years and they're not really ready yet, but then the moment comes and then you can move really quickly and then others where it's like you have an opportunity to do a deal in, you know, six weeks.
>> Yeah, we've seen both. I I'm sure we track it.
I'm not I don't I I don't have the the data off the top of my head, but we have had cases like that.
We we want to be an excellent acquirer like like I'd like ideally a 10 out of 10 reputation where you know super honest, super reliable, good price, fast and uh and it starts with establishing a good relationship with with founders, owners, boards.
Um uh I I I'm actually I think our ability to do that has surprised me in a way because you know we're so active that you could imagine my assumption was selling to someone who's so active and rebuilds parts of your business can be a little bit more difficult than selling to a more passive investor.
But it turns out a lot of founders see us as the preferred partner because number one we never sell.
So you know exactly what you're getting into like it's bendy spoons and it stays there for decades forever probably.
Uh also people appreciate that uh we invest for real in these products.
They they keep expanding and improving and often founders see that as their as their legacy and they they like to know that you know technical people product people will continue to pour uh love and effort into their babies.
Uh and I think we have a good history uh in that regard and also uh we you know we we have we're super flexible.
super flexible. So if if say a founding team wants to to to depart two weeks after closing because they feel that their their time there is is done and move on we they can do that and many more financial acquirers would ask you to stay for three years and roll over equity and that can be pretty difficult
after you know you ran that business for 10 years 15 years and now you've got to stay there essentially taking direction and so yeah and so that's you know that's what we find they like but also it starts with the with uh with meeting and and spending time and getting comfortable with each other much earlier than the transaction takes place. So So yes, absolutely.
We've had cases where we have known each other for two years and then the company felt ready and we and we got it done.
>> There's so many companies that I would love for you to own.
I hope that you do in time, companies that are you're now quite a bit bigger than in uh the public markets.
So um >> I have one last question.
Uh, is AI speeding up deal making specifically on research, spreading comps, getting to valuation, legal diligence?
Are you seeing AI bleed into your deal making >> a little bit?
It's not really a major area of efficiency for us because ultimately we only do five say five acquisitions a year get like order of magnitude.
>> So it's not really there that we unlock a lot of value.
a lot of value. where I think it's helping us tremendously is by enabling us to do more acquisitions uh and so scale the the like the operational side of things after we close the transformations running these companies because that's really a bottleneck to to
to growth um and uh and and then we have seen major improvements there we went from the KPI we we think ultimately is the best proxy for our productivity of that core team we call we call we call them spooners is revenue per spooner and then went up from about a million dollars in 2023 to roughly $4 million round. >> Let's give it up for the Spooners.
>> Let's give it up for the Spooners. >> That's fantastic. I love it. >> So, yeah.
>> Well, thank you so much and congrat.
>> What an incredible moment.
I'm so happy for you and the and all all 500 of you and more uh really really >> too many more successful deals.
>> Have a great rest of your day. >> Thank you guys. >> Good luck to you. >> Great to see you. We'll talk to you soon.
Let me tell you about >> Figma agents mean the canvas.
Your AI agents can now create and modify your Figma files with design system context.
Did you see what Riley Walls shared?
He shared a a heat map of the most popular types of dogs in San Francisco.
The city is dominated by Chihuahua.
It's overrun by Chihuahua apparently. I had no idea.
It's the capital of >> explains >> Chihuahua apparently a lot.
There's some Labrador Retriever hot spots.
There's a couple golden retrievers in the city.
There's a little area where there's a lot of poodles.
>> What do you guys think about pit bulls? Are you pro pitbull? >> Um, not my favorite. >> Not around me.
>> Not my favorite >> or anyone I love.
[laughter] >> Uh, skill issue.
Just learn to wrestle with the pitbull.
Just exert your your humanity over it and put it.
>> Are you a big pit bull guy? You like pit bull? >> No, not a big pit. >> What about Mr. 305?
>> I like uh I like a golden retriever. That's my that's my dog.
Even though I have I like New Finland.
But >> Bending Spoons opened at around 3029 $31 a share. It's now at 40. Nice little pop. Bill Gurley in shambles.
[laughter] >> A very modest pop.
He only gets mad when it's like up 2x or 3x. Uh 40% pop. Not too bad.
Not not not probably probably we we probably will not get a post from Bill Gurley about this one.
>> Luca is clearly just an absolute animal. >> Yes.
>> Like he's just like a guy who's just going to >> he's got the blinders on.
He's going to just keep executing the strategy.
He's going to own every iconic American company in time.
Running them out of a castle. He's everything.
[laughter] >> He's clearly like he's clearly like seven. He's clearly 50 years.
I will clear he's clearly drooling over Snap.
You know that every day he's just is texting. >> No. No. >> Like you up sell now.
[laughter] >> No, but I mean that's the kind of that's the kind of like I would say in the fullness of time Spiegel is obviously happy running the business, but um that that to me would be like a But social networks and network effects businesses seem uh uniquely durable in the long term.
Uh and I wonder if that's where they'll get into next.
A lot of these businesses have recurring subscriptions.
They have great businesses.
Some of them are enterprise.
Lots of stickiness in the revenue, but uh would be interesting to see them at the helm of a true social network, potentially even a growing >> one.
Anyway, >> our next guest is in the waiting room.
We have Nick Gman from USV.
He's a general partner and he's here to break down the Rebel Alliance thesis. >> What's up, guys? >> How you doing? >> I'm doing great. How are you?
>> So, you're fighting against the Death Star. What?
First, introduce yourself.
Tell us a little bit about yourself, your general investing thesis, and then break down the Rebel Alliance thesis. >> Yeah, you got it. It's great to be here. Um, >> I'm Nick.
I'm a partner at uh Union Square Ventures.
I've been at USV for about 15 years.
Um and we've over that time been investing >> overnight success bingo.
>> overnight success bingo. uh been investing up and down the stack and across you know moments in time when uh different sort of layers of technology have have emerged uh and you know open the door to lots of new stuff
and it's I think if there's one thing that's consistent about the way we look at the world it's like every sort of wave of technology is either kind of expansive or consolidating and uh those moments where it starts to feel expansive are just incredible right so back in our history. The first one was
The first one was like web two, you know, you had built the the core internet and now you could build anything on top of it.
>> Um >> the other one, you know, for us it was, you know, Twitter was probably like the big investment from that era.
If you look at like the crypto era, >> wasn't USV also in like Tumblr and Etsy and like a bunch of other companies from that era.
It was a great portfolio. >> Yeah, that was back.
>> Yeah, that was back. So the firm was founded in 2004 by Fred Wilson and Brad Bham and the thesis back then was um there's been this epic infrastructure build in the you know fiber and and switches and routers a first pass at building you know mainstream consumer apps but like you know a big blow up
with the dot you know pop and the thesis in 2003 which was pretty contrarian was there's going to be a big opportunity at the applications layer and there's going to be a moment you know it's time to build basically >> and that was pretty >> you know it wasn't the most popular view back then. Uh I think it created an
Uh I think it created an opening to make some really great investments in a lot of early you know um application layer things.
So we did Twitter, Tumblr, Etsy, SoundCloud, you know indeed you know a whole bunch from that era and it was all about you know the the tools are on the ground so what can we build with them?
And I think those moments when the tools are on the ground and it's time for people to build with them and anybody can build anything in any direction.
I think those are the moments that have always felt the most exciting to us and that we've been looking for you know for 20 some odd years.
>> Pros and cons of thesis driven investing.
Most I would say investors now are humble enough to be like I just try to find the best possible founder and give them money.
>> Most thesis I hear is is this one buy low sell high.
>> Yeah, that's also that's also a good one.
Um, but I just feel like, you know, you you guys have done so well like trying to really crystallize your vision of the future >> and the opportunity in the present and then investing and like actually being like we know there's a company that should be built here and then taking the time to figure out what the right team is to go and attack that opportunity.
But the I'm sure there's like the the other side of it was like sometimes you just like get a little high on your own supply and you know back back an opportunity that that doesn't exist and you kind of forced it because you wanted it to exist.
But so so every good strategy has its downsides. But I'm curious.
>> Yeah, I would say that the two potential downsides of sort of thesis driven are you're wrong.
Like that's [laughter] the worst one.
You're like you think something's going to happen and it doesn't.
Um that's happened to us, don't get me wrong.
Uh, and then the second flavor is like right idea, wrong team or, you know, right idea too early, you know, or whatever.
And like we've had our share of those two.
And so I think, you know, we're a small fund.
Uh we don't need to play a coverage game.
Uh we don't need to play momentum.
That's just not how we've operated.
And so we're sort of set up to be able to pick our moments and take shots and um you know have a point of view about what we think is going to happen and and hopefully if we're right we're contrarian and right you know and we we've been that way a bunch of times and hopefully if we're wrong you know we limit we limit the damage >> y on the losses. >> Yeah.
So take us through the rebel alliance. Who's in the alliance?
Who's out of the alliance?
Break it all down for us. >> Yeah.
So the Rebel Alliance, we just put this up on the USB blog last week.
Uh it's an idea that's been cooking uh for some time for us >> and it's basically the idea that if you think about AI and now agentic AI the opportunity is so much bigger than any one company and that there is a a massive ecosystem exploding uh around these incredible magic core models.
Um, and there are layers and components and modules and we're just beginning to start to see all of those get built out at an everinccreasing rate, especially now that model of capability is so good. >> Yeah.
>> And and that means that we believe there are going to be generational companies built up and down the stack.
Um, not just, you know, and really the, you know, I don't think that OpenAI or Anthropic are the Devastar.
I do think they are these really powerful companies with that that have sort of a vertical vertically integrated approach and I think the meme in the market is like maybe you know Claude becomes the world's only employee and and all value gets sucked into those companies.
Our thesis, the Rebel Alliance thesis is that the opportunity is so big and so massive and so expansive and there are so many forces pushing for this expansive motion that there are going to be companies, you know, in in all these components of the stack building around including the models themselves, but also so many pieces around them.
We're already starting to see it.
We're making lots of investments around them.
Um and to us it feels like you know the beginning of the whole economy but maybe the whole internet getting rewritten on the agentic stack and with an agentic approach.
Um and so really the idea is that this what's happening is is is bigger is so freaking big.
Um and that the opportunity it's like a great time to be building.
It's a great time to be building for builders.
Um and there's a lot of big companies are going to get built.
That's really the core thesis.
No, I I I love the thesis and uh we see it every day on the show where someone's coming on, not just with a big fundraising announcement, but a ton of revenue traction and a ton of customer love.
Uh I'm interested in uh the the down the stack feels maybe less contrarian to me just because uh I'll like you see announcements from the big labs where they're using Salesforce or they're storing all their data in Clickhouse and uh and and or or even going deeper into the semis and the memory and the energy.
All of that feels uh really obvious, but uh the the bigger meme from a year ago was like, are you going to get steamrololled by the next model?
And there were some companies that were just sort of thin rappers with some prompt engineering, but then you have companies like 11 Labs and Sunno and these specific midjourneys doing really well.
There's so many companies that have gone and carved out different niches and done really well.
Yeah, Sunno is one of my favorite examples because it's it's, you know, clearly a massive opportunity already a multi-billion dollar business.
Millions of people love the product and yet >> it's not a good fit for the labs to prioritize because the size of the prize is just like, you know, I don't, you know, Mikey's extremely ambitious, but like, you know, maybe it's a$20 billion business over time, right?
business over time, right? I mean the Gemini app say the Gemini app has a make music button inside of it and Sunno has still carved out like this incredible niche anyway >> and I think there's two there's two ideas like just looking at example like
sununo one is uh user experience right and I think as we cover this we rewrite the world of AI whether it's in media or industrials or robotics or health or whatever these experiences are going to need to be specific and tailored and you
know they're they're maybe you could call them niches but they're really big and I think that all doesn't collapse into a single app and then the other thing or or an experience and the other thing that we're seeing from everybody we talk to building it at the application layer whatever you however
you describe the application layer is uh model competition there's so many good models today and as we move um you know as more things move into production we start being aware of the trade-offs between model capability and model cost. Everybody who's building is thinking
Everybody who's building is thinking about how to build an abstraction layer to make those those best trade-offs to deliver the best experience and to have margins.
If you're building a product like Sunno, you know, you need to have margins.
If you're an enterprise adopting this stuff, you're thinking about your token cost.
And I think both of the those sort of forces are uh you know, are good for the Rebel Alliance.
And at the at the end of the day, it's a core theme is competition among the models, but it's not the only one.
All right, let's live workshop an idea that I have that I want someone I want someone to build.
>> Uh I over the weekend I was uh messing around with uh in chat with the image model on some furniture ideas that I had.
I managed to make some stuff that I think is cool.
I would happily pay like for this like chair that I made.
I'd happily pay a couple thousand to get a very great version of this chair.
And I was thinking like it'd be great if I could upload it and then have like some combination of like an Etsy or an Upwork style thing where furniture fabricators could say, "I will make it for this price.
Here's the work that I've done."
>> And basically like a marketplace to kind of manage that.
>> Uh theoretically, if I made it and it's great, then other people could just buy that product and the order would go to the fabricator and maybe I could get a little bit of a cut.
And I thought it was an interesting idea because it sort of like rides the tailwinds of like anybody can imagine and prompt a product into digital form and then like you need this network of people globally that can actually go make the products.
I'm not sure if it's just like too small of a TAM, you know, like how many people really want to make furniture.
Um but uh what's your immediate reaction?
>> Well, there was a company uh maybe a decade ago that did this for physical products.
Um, I'm blanking on the name right now, but you know, this idea of invent your thing and make it, you know, from the 3D printing area era to the, you know, furniture or other things, I think is even more possible now because part of what we have is the ability to design, you know, amazing things, you know, overnight.
And I think where kind of where you're going with this is this isn't really part of the Rebel Alliance idea, but it's another theme that we've been really focused on is uh services that plug into agentic experiences or I think with unique uh data or networks or sort of systems attached to them, right?
So in this case like product fabrication, distribution, so on so forth.
It's like you know these are durable types of networks that need to exist with a very different architecture that can plug into the agentic future.
Um, and so I think things like this are going to be successful.
And then there's a question of like at the end of the day, who owns the interface?
You know, what's the consumer experience for that?
You know, does it all roll into a chat dbt or a cloud or, you know, is it something else?
Kind of a separate question, but I think like there another theme is like durable networks uh as APIs into aic experiences or MCPS or whatever.
Um, I I think we're going to see tons and tons of those.
>> Should I pitch my idea?
the agentic AI for doctor billing.
>> No, [laughter] >> no, definitely not. Definitely not. >> For another time. For another time. >> For another time. Uh, how are you? >> Yeah. How are you?
Um, it's interesting the like I I I still have some weariness around this like Rebel Alliance style plays because of the first generation of companies that were leveraging uh GPT models.
They grew like crazy >> and then it just was a matter of like building an interface and an interface is is straightforward.
How are you like you clearly have have are overcoming that fear and are willing uh are investing a lot against it.
investing a lot against it. Um part of it is like I just feel like this dynamic now where hiring an agent is like quite different than hire you know just sign you know using software and like you just assume that agents are going to get
better and um one of the challenges is it's like an agent that is generally intelligent just like a human you can kind of plug into an organization and it can start just doing things and you don't really care that much how it how
it does things and so I just feel like the process of like hiring agents for companies um is going to be like quite a bit different than like the last generation of software where you had to build out this massive sales force and you know you're going to conferences and it's
like it's it's it's just a very different motion and I think that like the growth of of claude code specifically is like proof that like software has changed to some degree and you can get adoption of something at a speed that is entirely unprecedented. Um, so I'm curious how
Um, so I'm curious how you're thinking about like how how just like the procurement and sales is going to change because like again we have we have companies on every single day that have that have grown revenue incredibly rapidly.
They clearly are solving customer problems.
Um, you know, we had a healthcare agent company on today started in 2023.
It's a billion dollar company now.
Um but uh but yeah the question is like are are you still betting against when you invest in these companies are you just betting against general purpose agent progress?
Yeah, that's a really good question.
And I think um one important idea here is we're not just talking about will there be other agents that compete with Claude or Chad GBT like will people build sort of like personified agents and how will those get to market.
Um I think that's one version of what agents look like.
Another version of what agents look like is like cloud infrastructure where every, you know, company that's building any system is going to have agents and the orchestration of hundreds or thousands of agents built into their underlying, you know, platform, whether that's an app or whether that's an enterprise or or anything else.
And so if you I think part of the Rebel Alliance thesis for us is uh agents are moving from sort of people you like personified people you hire to cloud infrastructure >> and uh and it and when we look at how a agents are getting deployed and orchestrated today it's not just I'm hiring an agent and it's showing up in my Slack.
It's like I'm programmatically spawning you know 50 agents you know to go sort of be part of whatever system I'm building.
And so if you think of agents as infrastructure as opposed to agents as employees, I think that's where a lot of these forces come into play where every every company, every enterprise who's building in an agentic style is going to need model routing, uh model choice, orchestration, um you know, uh memory, [clears throat] um you know, some sort of harness, and there's there's different options at each of these as you're building up a systems.
So, so that's like really a big driver of this is the move from agents as people to agentic systems that have all of these layers in place and have more of like um corporate's the wrong word, but like a more of a production vibe to them where they're going to get built by professionals who want to have control and who are going to want to lay them out in increasingly sophisticated ways.
And so, so I feel deeply like like very very strong that that's happening. I see it everywhere.
And I think a big like a lot of the stuff that we're looking at right now in the agentic stack is like kind of low-level like networking and identity and payments and all these like pieces you need in order to compose and orchestrate agents.
We're moving from like agent as employee to agent as infrastructure and and I think that also is like a big driver of how why we believe so much in the Rebel Alliance thesis. >> Last question.
Can you take me through the financials, what they might look like at a Rebel Alliance company versus a non-rebel alliance company?
When I think about a lab, they might spend a billion dollars on a training run, amvertise it over months, and there might be all these GPU commits and and they're spending money like an industrial company sometimes.
Uh, if you're building Rebel Alliance company, does it look different? Is it all talent?
Are you subsidizing tokens at some point?
Is it cost of customer acquisition?
What are you pattern matching to in terms of like the shape of the business?
Are we doing 12 to 18month runway here?
Like how are you thinking about uh deploying capital and watching that capital flow through the business at the early midstage of a company?
>> Yeah, it's good that you brought up like capital intensity, right?
So I think because I think an idea here is there's this category of hyper capital intensive AI companies which is the big labs. Yeah.
>> Um, you know, we have a portfolio company called Plurales Research that does modeling but in a decentralized network using, you know, compute that's scattered around the internet.
So, you can still do training in a capitalite way. I think that's possible.
So, I don't want to make it seem like the all the models must be capital intensive in the form of a single company, but I think >> generally speaking, you're looking for things that are more capital light.
things that are more capital light. um a lot of the things in the middle like harnesses and memory and you know identity and payments I think a lot of that looks like kind of regular tech companies and then anything that sits at the sort of user level that's passing through token spend you know there's a
category of margin profile there that's that's new in the AI era right you're either taking a loss on on token spend passed through to the big labs or you're like ekking out margin by swapping out models and so I do think there's actually it's almost like this barbell of capital intensity where at the at the
model layer there's a lot of capital required and at the application layer there can be if you're subsidizing a lot of token spend um certainly on a free tier or or something like that but there's a lot in the middle that I think has more of a traditional capital >> it's just all wildly different than web 2 where uh a dollar of revenue was
usually a dollar of gross profit basically and now you you might see 60% gross margins you might see 20 you might see 90 it Just depends on how the entrepreneur has positioned the business and how what the >> and like 20% gross margins for some application companies is like great. >> Yeah. Yeah. It might be negative 50% >> Yeah. Yeah.
It might be negative 50% [clears throat] for them if [laughter] they're growing really fast.
Anyway, uh thank you so much for taking the time.
Really fun chat and we'll talk. My pleasure.
>> Have a good rest of Thank you so much. >> Bye.
Let me tell you about public investing for those that take it seriously.
Stocks, options, bond, crypto, treasuries, and more with great customer service.
Our next guest is in the waiting room.
And we have Julian Honik from Amble.
[music] He's the co-founder and chief design officer.
Julian, welcome to the show. Round of applause. Round of applause. >> Hi guys.
>> We're very excited to have you.
We very much enjoyed digging into the images of the new vehicle.
Would love to >> I view you as an angel sent from heaven to make my dream motor vehicle.
>> You saw the Ferrari Luche and just snapped and said I there has a different way. >> Enough.
It's time to make something >> beautiful.
>> Actually, take us back.
Tell us how you how you got here.
Little bit of your history and then uh some brief history on the company would be a great place to start. >> Yeah.
Well, first of all, thanks for having me. Super excited. >> Yes. >> Um, how did it start?
I mean, it started with a pretty simple conversation with with me and my friend Jose who is the co-founder, one of the co-founders.
>> And he has this beautiful hotel in Portugal in Alentasjo called Barocal.
and it's it's really beautiful.
And he's building a second one on the coast with with directly on the coastline in the dunes.
And he asked me, do you know of any good mobility solution or golf carts for for for my resort where everything is designed perfectly?
And then, you know, I did some research before and I said, I think there's nothing that really, you know, fits your standard you have you have in in the resort.
And we said, well, let's for fun, let's let's do something on let's design something for you.
And this this this little idea became reality because we realized if one hotel wants this, probably more hotels want too.
But also if you make it street legal, you open up a whole new customer base, right?
And I I lived in in Pasadena. I lived in LA.
So I >> You lived in Pasadena, California.
>> You got a res right here.
>> I live there currently.
I was born there, raised. That's amazing.
I And I >> I went to Art Center.
I mean, you're sure you know Art Center. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
I I live very close to there and I sent this to a friend who lives also in that area.
Uh because we've been talking he's we were talking about like can you get a golf cart in this area? Probably not.
I was asking Chachi BT like how much trouble will I get in if I have a golf cart and and he saw a golf cart and was like I think it's just an unlicensed golf cart.
I think somebody's just bending the rules.
And then I sent him the amble immediately because I was like this is what we've been talking about.
So I I fully expect these to take over Pasadena.
Um but but anyway, sorry I interrupted you there. No, no, no, no.
But it's, you know, those are the the LSV and you can you can through the low speed vehicles, you can make it street league in most states or almost all states.
>> Um, but yeah, I I I I you know, growing up there, I know the need and and you know, I've been many times in Florida, all parts of California, >> Texas.
So I I think the understanding a bit of the American market, I thought, oh, this could could really work well because there's nothing really nice out there yet that is electric open >> and and then we we also said, well, you know, we don't we just don't want to take a golf cart and make it pretty.
It's like we really started from ground up, meaning we make it slightly bigger, it's wider, >> um has of course bigger wheels, has um individual suspension.
So not only the design, but also the engineering, we spend a lot of time with engineering.
one of our head engineers actually comes from Formula 1, so we really take it seriously to to make something special.
>> No, I I you know, I was joking when you you you uh came on, but I totally agree.
I've spent I live in Mal like so we're the perfect customers for you.
I I live in Malibu, John lives in Pasadena.
I've seen every possible type of golf cart in every setting from commercial settings.
uh worked at a hotel, you know, a long time ago where I would drive these big, you know, bulky commercial >> uh golf carts to driving, you know, golf carts on golf courses to around the neighborhood.
I've seen the ones that are street legal, the ones that are not, the ones that are, >> you know, gas gas powered, the uh the ones that are, you know, more like farm vehicles, things like that.
So, I've looked at the full uh the full spectrum and you guys really nailed to me uh all the different all the different elements that matter.
Specifically, like I think a lot of uh a lot of vehicles in this category try to sell you on tech.
I went through this the buying process recently and they're like, "Well, this has this smart system and the backup camera and it's got, you know, full speakers and it's got it's got all these other things."
And and to me, I think just people are desperate for the best of modernity, but also the best of, you know, the the the 50s and the sort of like truly analog era.
And I think that um and I and I and manufacturers just haven't haven't like really listened to that feedback.
And so yeah, when I look at all the design decisions that you that you guys have made, uh it it looks like it's, you know, going to be incredibly solid to drive, right?
The wider the wider base, the proper suspension, it'll feel better in corners over things like as simple as speed bumps.
Uh and then and then just the the usability of it.
Like I don't want my outdoor vehicle to feel like a big computer, you know?
I just want it to feel like um I want it to feel like a classic, you know, um like something closer to a modern moch or something like that.
So >> I mean I Yeah, I think you you absolutely because what what for us was the most important is of course the design, but then the comfort, right?
Comfort also performance.
It's not something, you know, you take to Pismo Beach and you you go down the dunes, but it it it has quite some some some power, like three times more than the, you know, the average golf cart.
So, it's it's quite more powerful.
>> You can go 25° up uphill with full load.
So, this is something, you know, so it's the comfort, the performance, the design.
And in terms of gadgets and screens, we really intentionally said just the the basic screen at the front that's really nicely designed and then bring your own device.
bring your own device. like some of these you know you know some of of of these products they they have the screen but after a year or sometimes already when it ships is old right it's old news >> so we said instead of that let's focus on having a nice USB C port you bring
your phone and and [clears throat] uh and then you you know have have I mean we all know this right you're in your car you have a huge screen and what do you do you put your iPhone there >> on the screen and use ways right or Google maps or whatever you use >> can Could you take me through your design process? Does it start with uh
Does it start with uh pencil and paper?
Do you start in Photoshop?
Do you pull uh a mood board together?
Do you use AI to generate something like what is the process?
Because I imagine it ends in something like CAD, but where does it start and how does it evolve?
>> I'm just looking for my sketchbook.
Yeah, [laughter] >> sketchbook. Got it. >> Yeah.
Um sketch I think I think this all for for I mean I tell my son and all I think all students they should never stop sketching.
I think sketching >> with pen and paper is still the most direct way of expressing ideas and the fastest.
>> Uh okay now with AI you talk to your phone and and the drawing comes out but I think that's half the fun.
So uh it starts with sketching ideas >> and then fairly quickly we went into into 3D modeling like into cat.
Um and what we did I think what's very you know my my experience before was Audi.
I was um eight years at Audi then a year in Lambo at Lamborghini doing car design.
So my background is really on the one hand car design on the other hand I worked in 10 years at Apple in Johnny's team.
>> So I have bring both the product design but also the car design.
>> Um >> but yeah but what we did I think what's unusually we we we built a a driving prototype fairly quick in the process.
Usually you make a lot of models like one to one scale models and we just went directly into a driving prototype which was pretty pretty cool.
>> What is the next two years like?
What needs to happen to get to 2028 for deliveries?
Uh it feels extremely fast. It's amazing.
At the same time I'm not happy I want it today.
Um and so I'm but I am interested. Is it supply chain? Is it is it manpower? Is it regulatory? Is it all of the above?
What does it actually take to bring a new vehicle to the market?
Because I mean every other company it's 10 years so two years is great but what what does the next two years look like?
>> So um what we are in the process now we are I I would say 90% finished with engineering for manufacturing. >> Mh.
>> What it means is basically we have this amazing prototype but the last year we spent the full year of making this ready for mass production. Yeah.
for mass production. Yeah. which is the most difficult part because you have something you love then you have to you know factor in cost you have to factor in you know visibility the parts the actual parts you want to order the supply chain so we are like 90% there to
have that ready >> um spending a few month for two two three months more to put it together >> and then we produce we start producing end of the year >> um and we ship 2027 but only to um to hotels because as you said the the process of making the street legal takes another half a year. So we intentionally
So we intentionally start with with clients like you know Amaniri and and really like top clients for hospitality.
>> Uh and then we have >> dream come true.
>> We talk about Alangiri a lot.
So [laughter] >> it's I mean it's it's fantastic. >> Yeah.
Um, do so do you have uh it seems like there's a a little bit of ambiguity in your mind about where the split between hospitality and uh personal sales will be in a few years?
Are you starting to narrow the aperture there?
Do you have a vision for where you want the company to be?
Because it feels like with developing a great brand, uh, interfacing with the user, the first time they ride on it, it's at Almond Gary.
It's beautifully cared for.
It's in this idyllic setting. They wind up buying one.
They have very great brand aspirations.
Do you want this to go into street vehicle, sedan, SUV?
Do you want this to be 90% consumer sales eventually?
Like, where does this go if it becomes a huge business?
I mean, it's interesting.
We I mean, the hospitality is a great starting point, but we already see now after 3 days, we have already over a thousand pre-orders and and a lot from the US. Um, so >> I like this.
Oh, this is I have to get one of those, too.
>> Yeah, we have lots of sound effects.
>> We We can get you one. >> Yeah. >> Um, >> that's great.
No, I think uh I think it's I think I think there's going to be I think there's going to be a big market here.
I just I know so many people that um uh and I guess I would say like maybe it's a smaller market, but I think you can get a a very very very meaningful amount of it just because I've I know so many people that have spent this much money on a vehicle and gotten something that is just not not special. >> Yeah. >> Uh in any way.
So >> the open air not having the doors on.
I was looking at the taking getting a Ferrari Luchia and taking the doors off for a similar experience, but it's like 20 times the cost and so this is just makes so much more sense.
It's a more rational purchase and I think that's >> I think that the door is more expensive than our our car.
[laughter] >> Probably probably I think every door is probably 50K on that car.
Uh anyway, thank you so much.
>> Thank you so much for joining.
uh we will we will be your strongest uh supporters and uh you guys are welcome to come on anytime and thank you to Riley for for connecting us. This is fantastic. >> Yeah.
Thanks so much for having having me and uh looking forward. Yeah.
And hope to meet in person maybe the for the first deliveries.
>> Yeah, that'd be amazing.
We can go do a tour of our secondh car review on the show.
The other one was a hyper car.
>> Yeah, the the Zinger uh which is uh I think over a million dollars.
This is much more affordable.
Uh it's available at driveanamble. com.
Uh you can go check it out if you're listening at home.
Uh and thank you so much for taking the time to come on the show. >> Great to hang Julie. >> Thank you so much. >> Talk to you soon. Cheers. >> Goodbye.
Let me tell you about CrowdStrike. Your business is AI.
Their business is securing it.
Crowd Strike secures AI and stops breaches.
And Jordy, uh people were asking you to do a little bit of a little bit of a spin for everyone.
Show off the new merch you got there.
I'll tell everyone about Codeex. on the arms.
Codex is a powerful workspace for getting work done with AI agents.
>> Whether you're writing code, analyzing data, creating content, or automating business workflows, or just trying to just trying to look good.
>> We we just got our first shipment of I think around 200 of one of our new merch products. >> Oh, okay.
I know the one you're talking about.
>> And that one is going to be available online.
And [laughter] >> that's the one. >> No, no, no, no, no. Not the one.
Not the one you're thinking. >> Okay. Okay. Okay.
No, that one will also be available online after all of that.
>> We have one we have one that uh we have one that's a little bit silly. >> It's groundbreaking.
>> It's groundbreaking >> in the best way possible.
>> It's it's a product that humanity has been trying to create >> for centuries. >> Yeah. >> And we did it. We did it.
>> Uh and uh >> we had a breakthrough.
>> We had a big breakthrough. >> It took a long time. did.
>> Uh but uh but yeah, no, the merch will finally be for sale and we will make be it will be dropping in the chat. >> Oh yeah, >> first.
Yeah, >> we're not exactly sure exactly when >> but we will give it to you guys first.
>> And thank you for the patience. >> Yeah, we appreciate.
>> But on that note, >> we'll see you tomorrow.
>> Leave us five stars in Apple Podcast and Spotify.
Sign up for our newsletter, tvpn. com. We'll see you tomorrow. Goodbye. >> We love you.