0:00
We're sitting here with one of the great broadcasters in American history.
Search this video
0:01
So, at the risk of getting too meta on a podcast show, asking you about interviewing, we do want to hear your tips and what you've learned about the art of the great interview.
0:15
>> Gosh, I you know, I've never thought about it in a in a in in a systematic way and so um it's an interesting question.
0:22
I think that there are many different ways one can interview.
0:24
I don't think there is a formula that works.
0:28
I think you have to be true to yourself.
0:30
So, I'll give you a simple example.
0:33
I'm not a very confrontational interviewer.
0:36
Um I I find in my experience when you uh when you approach it that way you sometimes look good because you're {quote} {unquote} asking the hard questions and being tough and all that kind of thing.
0:51
But if the person you're interviewing is any good, that person now it gets the person's back up.
0:57
They're very defensive, they're very cagey, and you're not going to get much more out of them than very programmed responses where they feel under attack and so they're very you know carefully choosing their words.
1:10
Now, if I were in a kind of news interview situation where like I'm you know in the White House and you're trying to get the president to admit they made a mistake maybe that that works, but that's not my kind of interview.
1:23
In my kind of interview, I think of it more as seduction.
1:25
What you're trying to do is to get the person to relax.
1:29
Get them to talk about things they might not have talked about in a open and ungarded way where they may say a few things that they really believe, but they have hadn't quite thought about putting that in the way they do or you know things like that.
1:45
And so, my effort is always to make people to make them feel at ease.
1:50
To ask them the kind of questions that might get them to feel confident and secure.
1:54
Uh and I think sometimes if you even ask difficult questions in those circumstances, you find you get you at least get an you get an interesting conversation because because people see that you're not trying to you know, you're not going at them with a hammer.
2:14
I I did this interview just a couple of weeks ago and I thought about this with Omar Bartov, a Israeli scholar who of the of genocide who has very reluctantly can come to the conclusion that Israel is guilty of at least war crimes, maybe even genocide in Gaza.
2:31
And I and I know that, you know, a lot of people feel very strongly that he's wrong yeah, in the United States.
2:36
And so after a couple of questions, I said to him, "Let me Let me pose to you what many people hear when they hear you who are Jewish.
2:46
And they said they hear they think you are somebody who is very uncomfortable with Jews who have power, who have strength.
2:54
You want the Jew to be the victim.
2:56
You want you want you know, you're comfortable you come out of that AM is 80 years old.
3:00
You come out of that generation world and that generation.
3:03
But yet today's Israel is an is a tough-minded scrappy thuggish country that is going to assert its its you know, its rights and that leaves you feeling very uncomfortable.
3:17
And he he gave me a a very thoughtful response to that in a way that I think wouldn't have happened if I had started out hammer and tongs saying, you know, you're an anti-semite, you're a self-hating Jew or whatever it is, you know, so so it it's not that one is better than the other, but I I find that I learn more.
3:36
You know, you can only do what you think is interesting.
3:38
I learn more if the conversation is one where the person feels it doesn't doubt your your your goodwill or your bona fides and is willing to actually engage.
3:52
>> Have you noticed that guests have become so much more media-trained over time? Oh my god.
3:57
>> Yeah, I mean I remember the feeling I had this feeling I know it's a macabre story, but I had this feeling once when I was in India um after maybe it's about 10 years of Indian liberalization, so probably in the early 2000s.
4:15
And some um tragedy had had taken place in the in an Indian family.
4:19
One of the family members had killed the other or something like that.
4:25
And and I'm standing there and remember I grew up in India, so I I I know how lots of chaotic Indian life is and how histrionic and emotional people can be.
4:35
And out comes one of the one of the people one of the family members in a in a spotless white shirt and dark trousers and he says, "I have been designated by the family to speak for them.
4:46
We would like to thank all the people who have you know who had for the outpouring of concern and affection.
4:53
The family is in mourning.
4:56
We are deeply aware of you you know and he gave this clearly you know for a rehearsed speech about what you know what this feeling was and it was it was so incongruous coming out of you know coming in India where normally you hear people shrieking and wailing and and you know and things like that.
5:13
And I thought oh my god, you know, I pity the anthropologist because there are no natives left.
5:20
>> [laughter] >> Everyone Everyone has become this media-trained, yeah. >> Wow.
5:24
Do you find it hard on on TV to get to anything more than kind of media-trained sound bites?
5:29
How do you get a very condensed window unlike a show like this where you've got you know endless time?
5:34
How do you manage to get to the truth really quickly in a way that's not just sound bites?
5:39
>> So that's one of the reasons I only I rarely have politicians on.
5:45
I found that I you know and I did have some when I started out and and I came to realize exactly what you're saying.
5:49
I mean, it's what you're getting most most of the political shows that you listen to uh essentially sort of made for it's made for a TV theater.
5:59
You could almost say that you know, you you know what he's going to say, you know what the other guy's going to say and then you know what they So, it's sort of almost like you're watching a ping pong game where you know exactly how each side is going to play it.
6:13
So, I decided I'd rather get just smart people, scholars.
6:17
Um you know, I occasionally have often politicians out of power who are willing to be honest. Much more useful.
6:24
When you get somebody in power and we've occasionally done it and you know, regretted it for the most part.
6:29
Uh you know, I don't I suppose I don't blame them, but it's all talking points and it's all this kind of rehearsed uh talking points that are so inauthentic.
6:42
I mean, this is one of the the challenges in today's environment.
6:44
How do you come across as authentic? >> Mhm.
6:49
>> Um [clears throat] somebody once said about Bill Clinton uh this that guy has it made because he can do something nobody else can do.
6:55
He can fake authenticity.
6:58
Um and I think that that's absolutely true about Clinton.
7:01
It's true by the way, if you watch Mumtaz Ali in New York another incredibly gifted politician.
7:06
If you watch those those viral videos on Instagram it seems like he's talking to you in a just a completely natural or shocks way.
7:17
And then you watch and you'll notice the shot is perfect. He is he looks perfect.
7:22
If you think about camera angles, you realize he's got so two camera shot.
7:27
Um if you think about it, you know, he's he's in the shot in a perfect place.
7:29
The bodega owner is is standing right next to him.
7:33
These are all, you know, these are created moments, but they work because there's something about him that he is authentic.
7:40
>> The the Bob Dylans of of politics appear effortlessly cool, but >> Exactly.
7:45
>> so much has gone into it.
7:45
Um you've Maybe a a funny question given that you you said it was somewhat like seduction, but you've you've interviewed some amazing people.
7:53
Who came across as the most brilliant and who made you the most >> Um probably the most brilliant is an unusual It's not somebody who um who who uh who looms large, Lee Kuan Yew, the founder of Singapore. >> Yeah.
8:13
>> Because you know, most most political figures or statesmen are men of action.
8:17
And I've interviewed many many men of ideas, who you know, who are very thoughtful.
8:24
Lee Kuan Yew actually combined the two.
8:27
He was deeply strategic in the way he thought about the world, deeply philosophical.
8:33
But he also then had a way to execute, which was really quite extraordinary.
8:39
It's actually very similar to, you know, the very greatest business leaders, like somebody like a Steve Jobs, had that ability to conceive of of a product of but then to drive it down and say, "And I want this thing to be thin, and I don't want there to be an external drive, and I don't want, you know, and I'm going to force you to make that happen."
8:57
So Lee Kuan Yew once told me that the greatest achievement he had, which most people thought was to take this sand bar at the end end of Malaysia with which kicked him out, you know, as a city and and create Singapore and then make it one of the richest cities in the world.
9:13
He said, "My greatest achievement was to create a nation."
9:17
What most people don't think about is I got a polyglot population of Chinese, Malays, Indians, some expats, and I turned it into a nation.
9:24
And after the first 5 years, we've never had a race riot, we've never had a religious riot. But how did we do that?"
9:30
And he had this very detailed and elaborate plan about how you were going to have housing where people were going to live in communities.
9:38
Um and so that still exists in Singapore today.
9:41
You know, you live in racially quote and there are quotas for your your your neighborhood block.
9:47
And if you go past the quota, well, then you can only send your sell your apartment to an Indian or a Chinese or whoever is they need to restore the balance.
9:55
So it's a very thoughtful uh approach, very very much a a nanny state.
10:00
But that I think is so unusual to find that combination.
10:06
The person who probably left me most uneasy was the Dalai Lama. >> Really? >> Really?
10:14
>> Because, you know, it's sort of it's not a format that allows for uh the wisdom that he has.
10:21
You know, I was sort of trying to trying to find an interesting, you know, quote or moment or sound bite.
10:31
And it that's just not his thing.
10:31
I mean, he's, you know, so I give you I mean, we, you know, we normally tape for you we we try to do particularly important interviews where we'll we'll tape for half an hour and edit down, give you the best 15 minutes as the viewer.
10:47
I mean, we taped with the Dalai Lama for like 550 minutes because I couldn't find the sound bite.
10:53
I couldn't find the moment because >> He wasn't engaging on that level or >> He was, you know, it's the He's he's >> He's brilliant, no?
11:02
>> Right, I mean, it's but it's a different brilliance, you know, it's a kind of aura. It's a way of being.
11:05
It's a way of Yeah, it's a way of being more than a way of articulating so Think about Have you ever Is there something you could quote of his that is that, you know, >> I've read a lot of his books, right?
11:17
>> Cameron probably could.
11:17
He's written his thesis on Buddhist philosophy, but he might be in a minority of one.
11:21
[laughter] >> But but but you know, it's so much of what he's trying to get you to to do is not to be an analytic machine.
11:26
And right, he's trying to get you to be present, to be thoughtful, to you know, to >> Maybe he was deliberately undermining it.
11:36
>> Right, [laughter] right, to sort of turn off the analytic machine, you know, it's a I think about this a lot with AI because I think AI is going to do, you know, at the end of the day the AI is going to be a better analytic machine than we are.
11:47
So, what are we left with?
11:49
So, we have to cultivate those those qualities that the Dalai Lama has, but it's it's just it's hard for it to come come across in a Q&A format and I kept looking for it and I kept saying, "Well, maybe if I ask him this, maybe if I ask him that, you know."
12:03
[laughter] >> And maybe just closing out on the future of media itself, do you think that there will be CNN in 20 20 years?
12:08
Will there be big TV networks? Will there be TV at all?
12:16
>> Um, it's a great question in the sense of um, you know, obviously there'll be a variety of formats and people will will will consume the the news individually, that's already happened.
12:25
Um, what I what I I wonder about is this question, you know, we went from a world where there was media was largely cartelized.
12:34
So, you had the three big networks um, in the United States a version of that in Britain um, ITV, you know, and the and the BBC and now you have this kind of disaggregated um, dozens and dozens, maybe hundreds and hundreds of media outlets.
12:53
Um, CNN remains one of the last, maybe the last global media platform.
12:58
You know, when I go to Singapore people are watching it, when I go to I was in China last month I met with a a member of the standing committee of the Politburo and he said, "Oh, I watch your show."
13:09
And I thought to myself, obviously you have a VPN cuz it's banned in China.
13:15
But, the question is, will there be any such platforms that kind of are open and broadly accessible and everybody is aware of even if they don't watch it in as as much as they used to in the old days, or will will it all be these silos where, you know, you have these individual where everyone has constructed their individual media diet?
13:38
And I I think it's probably going to be the latter.
13:43
And I worry about that because I think you lose a common conversation.
13:45
Now, we've lost it in the cultural realm.
13:48
So, I'm older than you guys.
13:51
The The world I grew up in in the 1980s in the United States, for example, everybody had watched Raiders of the the Lost Ark.
14:01
The you know, the Indiana Jones movies.
14:06
Everyone had watched When Harry Met Sally.
14:07
The you know, great romantic comedy. >> Star Wars.
14:10
>> Everyone had watched everybody.
14:14
Everybody had read a certain set of books, you know, Bonfire of the Vanities, Storm Wolves, great book, or you know, there there was a certain kind of common culture that you got It wasn't very highbrow.
14:25
Everyone had watched Seinfeld.
14:27
Um I I think I have three kids.
14:33
One is 27, one is 23, and one is 18.
14:37
There's very little that they watch that is in common.
14:40
There are a few things, but particularly music.
14:42
But for the most part, each constructs his or her own you know, and and you see this in even the way they watch.
14:50
So, I have a nice, you know, family room with a big TV.
14:55
And I'll watch my kids watching their shows on their their phones.
14:58
And I'll say, "Why don't you just turn on your screen it on the TV?"
15:05
And it's more that it's a personal relationship.
15:08
You know, the show is There's something personal about it when it's on a screen you control in front in front of you.
15:15
You're getting your text messages at the same time on the same screen.
15:20
You know, it's it's a very different experience.
15:22
And so, the thing I wonder is Okay, we we don't have that common culture.
15:28
And you know, in in some ways it's incredibly liberating for people to be able to just do whatever they want.
15:34
Um but democracy does require a kind of common civic discourse.
15:38
And the fact that you had these broad media platforms that allowed everyone to participate, at least to be aware of the same facts and the same uh issues.
15:50
>> And attempted for some element of objectivity. >> Exactly. Exactly.
15:52
And and you know, the producer had to do that cuz we knew that there was a broad the the audience was some liberals and some conservatives and some, you know, anarchists or whatever.
16:02
So, you had And now the incentive, you know, let's be honest, the incentive if you're only getting one sliver, and that sliver is going to be politically skewed one way or the other, you're you know, it's to preach to the converted, to preach to the choir, not not to try to provide that set of objective facts.
16:20
>> And and the only people with the kind of reach of a CNN would be individuals like the Kardashians or Elon or Donald. >> Exactly.
16:27
And and very few of them have a unbiased desire, right?
16:30
They they have their own agenda that they're pushing, whether it's financial or So, so that's what worries me a lot.
16:36
That democracy does does depend on a kind some kind of common um common set of facts, common set of set of values.
16:45
And there are fewer and fewer places where one can >> air them, discuss them.
16:51
>> For you it's a great, I think, distillation of your contribution over the past few decades.
16:55
So, a great place to end there.
16:56
Thank you so much for joining John R. Ideas.
16:59
>> This this was such a pleasure. Thank you. >> Thank you.