Ben is from Fremont and he is a fifth generation Nebraskan just to be clear this is the conversation I want to have with Ben sass not the one you want to have I thought I was interviewing you on the complacent class is that wrong that's wrong so I'm interested in Nebraska I've been to Nebraska Freedom loving people
should be exactly I've been to both States they have almost an identical per capita income median income age structure demographics yet when I'm in Kansas and Nebraska they feel to me like very different states how would you describe that difference and where do you think it comes from when I was a kid the joke was uh if
you go back to Kansas you have to set your watch back 24 hours 24 years ah I ruined the joke my dad is to be so disappointed I didn't know you were going to ask that I have no idea what the difference is they have a lot of wheat we don't have a lot of wheat you have more Al so it's alala versus wheat we have corn beans and
we're the largest cattle state in the Union will Cather said you're a newer State John Gunther says you're a state with fewer doters it seems you have more northern European immigrants uh very different history with slavery and Kansas is more dependent on Missouri and somehow when you stack those up you have
two states each very independent in its Outlook uh Nebraska to me feels more Progressive and almost in a way orary in a positive way orary we'd have to Define both Progressive and orary but I think your list just the fact that they're Missouri dependent and we're not Iowa dependent means we win you win cultural appropriation so Bruce
Springsteen he's done this album called Nebraska but once he starts singing it's actually all about New Jersey it's about mawa the turnpike the wee wee hours there's a mention of the word Bleak and then he goes back to New Jersey are you offended I just think we should let Tyler monologue for a while this is this
is good stuff and I don't think I'm going to add a lot of value here just keep going here's what else to me is striking about Nebraska and as a fifth generation you might have insight into it there's a certain generation of performers and so many of my favorites come from Nebraska so Fred aair Johnny Carson James Coburn
tough guy incredible actor Marlon Brando and finally Henry Fonda who we might think of is kind of Grandpa On Golden Pond but the young Henry Fonda was a bit more like James cobber and tough guy very strong lots of Charisma James Baldwin admired him greatly so what is it about Nebraska that has produced this
stream of of charismatic men I don't know but it let's be declare that Kansas doesn't have that [Laughter] list another striking feature of Nebraska I'm sure you're familiar with it you're the only state president Cabrera made clear that you do your homework and I just want to say that he's right you're the only state that has a
single legislature right we are that dates from 1937 George Norris who was a great senator from Nebraska not exactly my politics but a smart very Driven Man very independent always independent of his party that's a long-standing Nebraska tradition uh but what's your view on the notion of having a single
legislature at the state level I think it's an interesting option that more States should consider there there are pros and cons but we are not just a unicameral as opposed to a bamal legislature we're also nonpartisan uh so our legislature meets five months one year and three months the off year uh
basically whether or not it's a budget year or not and the culture of the state senate or the state legislature is is really different uh than most legislative bodies across the us there are 99 of them we have one and all the other 49 states have TWO each uh and because it's a nonpartisan unicam role
with no caucusing officially it's it's about two to one Republican to Democrat if you actually had everyone declare their affiliation but the culture of the place allows different kinds of coalitions to emerge I believe strongly in the separation of powers um and in just the decentralization impulses of our Founders to to divide power both
vertically and horizontally but there's no obvious reason why state legislator should need to mirror what the federal legislature does so I I think more States should consider a unicameral and even a nonpartisan unicameral structure now George Norris's original case for a unicam legislature he hated what he
called the the conference committees that the two houses would each have a version of a bill and then a time would come when the two versions had to be reconciled and then in his view the voters would disappear deliberations would take place secretly and that this was what Nebraska needed to abolish how
does that analysis seem to you now that there's a many years of experience with the single uh unicamera legislature yeah I think there is a George Norris had a a bunch of different transparency impulses uh the vast majority of which are good uh some of them are complicating so all public searches in Nebraska are supposed
to be declared well when you're searching for a new president of the University system that changes the culture quite a lot in ways that takes away a whole bunch of candidates there are lots of people when President Caba mentioned uh George Mason becoming the 67th R1 research University in the country if you are just hypothetically
speaking I'm not naming where Nebraska Falls in that pecking order but if you're research University 30 in the country and you want to get a new president and maybe you think you should reach up and there's a reason why person leading institution 20 should be at Nebraska or person at University 40 who
may think that he or she has a shot to lead a top 10 institution and you're at the 30th institution you want to go grab them um most people are not going to be a party to a search where they might publicly lose and so if you have a lot of opportunities in life the impulse toward transparency and executive Search
is not always a great impulse but the vast majority of what I think Norris wanted to accomplish with shining a spotlight on conference committees I think I think he's been right about a lot of that something else striking about Nebraska a lot of states in the Midwest and the whole country uh the country is now well into economic
recovery but small towns of say below 15,000 population are often having trouble uh there's some of this across the country and I'm not asking you about particular policies but conceptually as an abras what is it you feel you understand about this process of rebuilding or maybe even shuttering up a
declining small town that the rest of us here may not understand as well what what wisdom could you carry to us on this wisdom's too big of a word uh but I I think at the level of analytics we're not thinking at all or we're not thinking nearly um aggressively enough about what's happening as we transition
from what I kind of think of as third stage the third stage economy industrialization to this fourth stage economy um where you've gone from hunter gatherers to agrarianism to industrialization Mass urbanization Mass immigration to this new thing which we don't even know how to talk about it yet right we don't we don't have a real name
for it um the the post-industrial economy is the way of throwing in the towel and saying we don't know what to call this thing that is the it economy the service economy the mobile economy the digital economy but I think it's useful to map those economics on top of sort of local community neighborhoods
you had Nomads you had Villages you had Urban ethnic neighborhoods and you have whatever this Suburbia exurbia mobile thing is and I think lots and lots of our problems are that we don't know what human capital is going to look like in this fourth stage so when you look at a state like mine it's a little easier to
see what that transition looks like but even there I mean in terms of see what the disruption looks like not transition because that implies we know where we're headed and we don't but um Nebraska has 93 counties uh I used to long ago before I was a politician I'm one of five people in the Senate who's never been a
politician before I've never run for anything until I did this and I used to feel really free to just say whatever I thought even when I thought it was witty regardless if it would get me in trouble and I used to joke that we have 93 counties in Nebraska and 12 of them have people it turns out people from the
other 81 counties don't like that kind of joke um but I'm from one of those places and I I think it's kind of fun to think you're from a place that has 80 head of cattle per person but when you when you parse Nebraska's 1.9 million people we have 70 750,000 basically in Metro Omaha we have 250,000 in Lincoln and a few small towns that it's
swallowing up and the vast majority of the rest of the state is essentially built along a spine on I80 or on the Plat River where you have 25,000 person towns that are where um the meat packing plant is where the truck dealership is where the tractor dealership is where the grain elevator is right so there
there's a regional uh Hospital in most of these 25,000 person Downs that's basically the scale and then all the other places are much much smaller so the third largest city in Nebraska we often joke is the University of Nebraska Lincoln football stadium on game day where we have 95,000 people but you fall
from there to we have a 40,000 person town then a bunch of 25,000 and then these communities under 5,000 the vast majority of counties in Nebraska right now are rapidly shrinking but we don't understand how much they're shrinking because we're unable to account for the age migration inside the county in most
of our counties again 70 plus of 93 that are shrinking the county seat is actually growing so think about that the county shrink but the county seed is growing what's really happening is 65 70 and 75y old farmers are moving to the town where they go out to dinner or where they play golf or where the assisted living facilities are because
they're going to age and they're going to retire in the community they're from but technological substitution for labor on these Farms is that we're getting I live in the Bread Basket of the world we're getting more and more egg productivity out of these counties than ever before in human history but with
rapidly diminishing labor inputs and so I don't think we've given much thought at all to what it looks like to think about these towns when you go from being a Class B or Class C school to being a place that might not have many kids at all and so I I don't think we're thinking about the exurbanization of
America as a reclustering around 100 to 250 towns in the country or cities but that's really a lot of what's happening right now so there's no there's no wisdom there but there's analytics because you can see a lot of places in Nebraska that are rapidly going to shrink when this generation dies now you have a PhD in history from yel
University American history and I'm sure you're familiar with Frederick Jackson Turner this idea of a Turner thesis America being shaped by its interaction with the frontier now in the physical sense that Frontier would appear to be closed we not in the middle of the Space Race anymore what today do you see as
the American frontier that's still shaping our dynamism um here I could tap this guy named Tyler Cowan who has an interesting new book uh about a lot of our sapped dynamism at the present moment and so I think the absence of a clearly defined set of strategic choices around the next Frontier is one of the things that leads
to a real worry about declining ambition for lots of folks so I'm sort of mixed on the Turner thesis but the idea of a frontier I think David Brooks does has done some really interesting stuff talking about the way Americans have his torically look to the Future in ways that there's clearly a transition
happening right now where there's enough worry that we have a lot of looking to the Past um the way we talk about um de-industrialization is a pretty good example the vast majority of transformation of industrial economy jobs is because of technology and we're pretending it's because of trade because it's easier to come up with a way to try
to demonize somebody um so I worry that there's not enough looking to the Future and we need a lot more shared Vision about what those big opportunities of things we can build together are so I think it's 2004 when you finish Yale and your dissertation is a copy of it here uh which I enjoyed reading you did not
did you really my goodness I'm sorry uh I like every grad student I wrote a 520 page dissertation because I didn't have time to write a 220 page dissertation that thing is woefully under edited sorry brother but it won two prizes and I I know you don't have perfect recall of all of the details but if you could give us a very broad
sense I do not recall of what you wrote on even even the field your degree was was in well thank you for giving me lots of room to dock uh I wrote on the realignment of domestic politics uh 1950 to 1980 in light of the Cold War uh the title is something like the anti-mine majority named for meline Murray O'Hare
secular left religious right and the rise of Reagan America I think the realignment of social conservatives and a lot of old Democrats into the Republican Party particularly in the South and in the midwest um had many many factors that drove it and if you listen to academic historians usually the story is very quick quickly
reducible to one factor and one factor alone and that's backlash against the civil rights movement and I think there's a whole bunch of structural and personal racism in America that needs to be confronted and some of the realign does relate to backlash the Civil Rights Movement but the story is actually lots
more complicated than that and I don't think we've done a good job of understanding our present moment and how we got to this place by understanding that in the Cold War um Grassroots America looked at Soviet Soviet uh communist expansionism as a threat not just because of centrally planned economics but because of a fear um that
Soviet a Soviet atheism was going to be enforced in certain kinds of ways that might expand into the world and ultimately forcibly secularize lots of different institutions in American life and so for instance one of the the chapters in my thesis is about a letter writing campaign um to the FCC in the
1960s and 1970s that is arguably the largest letter writing campaign in the history of the English language that almost nobody knows anything about more than 30 million people Americans wrote letters uh to the FCC to protest the fact that that meline Murray O'Hare was going to get religious broadcasting
declared illegal in America there was actually no such effort there was there was no mine Murray O'Hare the FCC was never considering making religious broadcasting illegal and yet the ways that people came to believe that that might be true and the way this conspiracy theory took root and led 30 plus million people to write letters
relates to the way School prayer uh prohibition came about in the Supreme Court decisions of 1962 1963 and that has to do with a different interpretation of The Establishment Clause than the way Americans had understood The Establishment Clause if you read first amendment before the 14th Amendment tries to incorporate it not
just against Congress shall make no law but States and localities and local school districts can't as well there's a whole bunch of stuff that happened in American life in the 1950s 60s and 70s that's really quite interesting and was scary to lots and lots of people and I personally have no interest in prayer to
the unknown God in schools in the 1960s for theological reasons particular commitments that I have um abstractions about that don't interest me very much but I have lots of sympathy for why people thought forces well beyond their control were making decisions that affected the local and so I I think the
the realignment that ultimately came to full fruit uh in 1980 has lots of variables that we have to understand against the backdrop of international understandings of the Cold War brought home to local communities in the US and you also show a lot of that realignment had come as early as 1972 so the
southern strategy Catholics lining up behind the Republicans in that year Nixon that was earlier than people thought and that was tied into religious issues right and before before you leave that I just want to say because a lot of the stuff that we might talk about later tonight I think the 1960s still produce a hangover for
almost every fight we have today and if you think about the long 1960s um it is amazing there have only been four truly gigantic landslides in the history of presidential politics in America but I defining a big Landslide as somebody winning more than 60% of the popular vote that's only happened four
times in US history but two of them were LBJ in 64 and then Nixon in 72 that swing in eight years from a landslide one way to a landslide the other is really amazing and you can only understand that if you understand how disruptive the 1960s were in community after Community across the US now just to be clear what's going to
follow is not in any way a question about President Trump but Trump trump is a a kind of data right so he is not in every way a traditional religious conservative it would be fair to say really and given that the Republican party uh elected Trump as their candidate and he then has become president what should this cause us to
rethink about the role of religion in the rise of the right over the last 20 to 30 years does that new data in any way revise previous thesis about whether it's Reaganomics or religion or counter reaction to the 1960s or do you see what I'm asking not really a bit um I don't know that there's any way we could do justice to a
question that big and under a couple of hours but maybe just a few big glosses um I think that both of these political parties are almost completely intellectually exhausted I don't think either party can articulate a vision for America that's five or 10 years futur looking right now so when you ask the
American people do you identify more with the Republican party or the Democratic party and if you don't give them the option to say none of the above 46% of people still interrupt to say none of the above that's stunning right so basically they're 29% Democrat leaning 25% Republican leaning and 46% refuse to answer your question um if
you're of the party of Lincoln as I am that's really scary because our 25% are lots and lots older than the Democrats 29% um and then when you ask you drill down on the 54% who are willing to answer and you say and why are you a Republican why are you a Democrat something like 70% of the people Begin
by talking about why the other party is so much worse than your party right so the these parties don't know what they stand for and they surely can't communicate it and they definitely can't communicate it in a constructive positive Winsome way and so that's the starting point for the election cycle of
2016 and so I think both parties were right for a hostile takeover and if you think about 17 candidates in the Republican primary you went a long way into that cycle before the president now presidents um numbers ever got anywhere near 40% and at that same point um Bernie Sanders is getting 45% of the democratic vote and he's not a Democrat
right so both parties were very ripe for hostile takeover and then I think you have to understand some of what happened in the 2016 cycle uh on the Republican side as partly Legacy of a 2012 moment where Mitt Romney had difficulty closing the deal because of the way Ron Paul was able to stick around and so the party
changed a bunch of the rules so there would be easier consolidation wh why do I say all that um I say that because I think that you have to understand the 2016 primary as one thing on the Republican side and the Republican party is too vacuous of what we stand for right now um and so it was right for a
hostile takeover that happened and then you ended up with what was perceived as a binary choice for a lot of voters between two candidates that were not viewed as very trustworthy and so then you end up with a general election choice that is not a big Vision choice and so I don't know how you would go the next level down and talk in great detail
about you know what the religious components were to a political ideology because I don't think we made a choice about ideology in the 2016 cycle I think we sort of made a choice that was about a lot of folks saying burn the place down and let's just see what happens because I don't like the direction we're
headed now now you men mention in your book I think that you visit Israel each year when you go to Israel what is it the main thing you feel you learn and the main thing you feel you learn about the role of religion in public life I don't think that's why I go uh I think I go because um again one of five
people who's never been a politician before in the Senate I've been there two and a half years and so I do I I don't do a lot of Congressional Delegation trips I've got little kids and I want to be with them as much as I can and I go because it's fun by the way if you're wondering you're more fun than I am uh I
your kids are different ages than mine 27 yeah uh mine are 15 13 and six so when I travel I travel almost exclusively for national security reasons and when we have as many troops deployed as we do in the Midwest and I serve on the armed services committee it said Midwest and that's where I'm from
and we have as many troops deployed in the Middle East as we have um I feel uh East West there's troops out there right it turns out Ohio and Jordan are really [Laughter] similar um I want to be sure I understand what we're working on in terms of developing a national security strategy for post 1989 because we're 28
years since the end of the Cold War like 26 years since the fall of the Soviet Union but now that you've been there a number of times more what is it you understand now that you didn't before well I'm I'm mostly I mean Israel is a place that believes in um in human rights and the rule of law and a whole
bunch of things that a lot of their neighbors don't believe in and so when I'm going to visit troops at different places Israel is just a place that we end up stopping uh coming and going and and have meetings with the Prime Minister and other folks in the in the parliament but um so I'm not there uh for reasons related to religion in
public life I'm there because I don't think we have a national security strategy for an age of cyber and Jihad where if you're like we are when we we teach our kids about the world or we're talking about something on the global stage and a new country's name comes up we get out of globe and you spin it
around and we make our kids find the country we're talking about and look at their neighbors and think about who their trading partners are think a little bit about the culture and the history and the geography um but one of the downsides of that is you look at a globe and it has borders around 200 countries and we act like there are 200
countries in the world that are really similar there are about 140 countries on the globe that have a monopoly on violence Within than their borders and there are about 60 places that are more like Libya or Syria or Iraq or Afghanistan um where there really isn't a monopoly on violence with the
government and so that distinction that most Americans learned after 911 between Al Qaeda and the Taliban is operative in lots of places in the world we were not attacked on 911 by the Taliban we were attacked by al- Qaeda but al- Qaeda is only possible because the Taliban didn't really control their territory and in
these ungoverned spaces you know organizations that are not States but can have a global reach emerge I think we need a strategy for how we think about all these places we don't have a strategy for Syria right now the biggest humanitarian the biggest Refugee crisis since World War II there were 21 million
people in Syria on the begin on the eve of their Civil War today about 11 million of 21 million people have been displaced from their homes half beyond the borders and half basically amassed on their northern and southern borders right Jordan is always in danger of falling right now because of the pressures of the Syrian refugee crisis
into their country the King Abdullah will tell you that there are lots of local communities lots of school districts in Jordan that have more Syrian kids than Jordanian kids in their schools think about what that would be like in the communities where you live if all of a sudden you had a majority of
kids from a different country um so that's really why Israel becomes a stop off point on that there's a lot more we could unpack I think the reason I referenced in the book is because of the 17-year-old kid serving in the IDF running missile installations now you're renowned for sometimes driving for Uber do you prefer Uber pool or Uber
x uh as a writer I'm often Uber X but I'm just regular Uber as a driver but how often do people recognize you uh so I currently have an argument with Senate Ethics Committee so I'm kind of on suspension from Uber uh but um my Uber writing my Uber rating by the way is outstanding it's a 10,000 uh people tell
me it's the best Uber rating anyone has ever had uh better than your AC phenomenal uh it would be better than that what do people tell you when they recognized you what would they say in Uber it's in Uber well I mean first of all I've tended to drive around Nebraska football games yes uh and so I'm often
letting people know that it turns out Uber has a $150 search charge if you vomit in the back of a car uh that's a market mechanism you still got high ratings that's right um people like to know in advance before they get the charge uh when you're picking up people after the football game or after tailgating uh it's amazing how Frank
they'll be if all of a sudden they find they have their Senator as their driver for 9 minutes and uh they'll tell you what they're what they're worried about I I tend to view uh voters very similarly to the way I thought about who my audience should be when I was writing a dissertation which is assume that the
people you're writing for are lot smarter than you are but that they know nothing about your topic right I think it's a useful way to think about complicated policy discussions assume that the voters are a lot smarter than we are um that they're wise but that they're not immersed in the detail dayto day and so you need to figure out how to
telescope in and out at the level of detail you want to talk about and uh I'm very fascinated by work I think it's a fundamental anchor of human identity and I instead of just doing town halls with my constituents I like to work with people um so I do lot of egg labor um partly again I have little kids and I
want them to suffer and so I take them with me to work uh on the farm or uh on a ranch but it's pretty easy in Nebraska to figure out ways to do EG labor it's tough to find ways to work with people who have modern knowledge economy jobs and learn from them and so that's why I want to play in the sharing economy to
learn a lot more about it and I think people understand that we're going through a massive disruption in the nature of work this is unprecedented in human history to have people um who are going to be 40 and 45 and 50 and 55 and get disintermediated not only out of their job and out of their firm but out
of their whole industry that's never happened before Bill Gates's way of talking about it is this is the first massive intragenerational economic disruption other economic disruptions when you had technological substitution creating push from the farm and pull to the city that wasn't you know one 45-year-old farmer laying down his tools
or her tools and moving to the city it was 55 and 60 year olds recognizing that their 15 and 20 year old kids were not going to have the same life they had and they were going to leave and go to the city we're going to have intragenerational work disruptions and a shortening duration of jobs forever more
and that's new and um in the sharing economy is a place where you find people that are actually thinking about that now at age 37 you were president of Midland University in Nebraska I think at the time the youngest University president in this country and there's a common claim that it's an economic
problem for colleges and universities that administrative costs have become too high do you agree with this claim or not I do agree with this claim and what do you feel is the root of that and what do you think is the solution I don't think we have nearly enough uh forms of higher education in the US um I think we
pretend that we have one model of highered we actually have a handful of models but we need dozens and scores of different types of Institutions so first of all I think we should recognize that the the teaching mission of a liberal arts college uh and the research mission of a large University are really really
different things and we should admit that um different faculty have really different strengths and weaknesses and we should admit that um one of the things that I learned and this is not directly on your point of administrative costs but there's sort of an adjacency here um the college that I took over had accounting as its I think fourth largest
major and we used to brag at this liberal arts college that happened to have a pretty strong set of business programs and accounting in particular was large we used to brag look how great we are we have a 40 to1 student ratio in our accounting programs and the University of Nebraska Lincoln the flagship big State University campus
down the road they have a 330 to1 ratio we're 40 to1 they're 330 to1 and we bragged about that a lot turns out there's some data on this and the student experience at 40 to 1 and 330 to1 is just not different at all because 40 to1 is well beyond a seminar feel and so there are five nerds that talk all
the time in a 40 to1 class or in a 330 to1 class and in both cases the feedback loop of the professor so that she or he understands what students are learning or not is not well represented by the five kids who talk all the time and so we started looking at what if you had all online delivery of accounting
classes all iners or hybrid and now let's measure them based on both cost Effectiveness and educational efficacy or Effectiveness as you'd expect that all online is the cheapest hybrid is middle and all in person is the most expensive but counterintuitively at least to me hybrid was the most educationally effective then all in
person then all online well why is that turns out what the hybrid gets you is it gets you high frequency low stakes quizzing where individual students are disagre at and professors figure out what students are bottlenecked on what things you still have an interpersonal relationship you have a place to go to
have the tutorial which will free you from your bottleneck but it turned out the it added lots and lots of value um I don't think you're going to get to that kind of differentiation by program type through the uni the traditional model of just more and more Administration and all faculty being treated the same way
whether you're really primarily a teacher or whether you're primarily a researcher so I want a real pluralization of these forms now before we get to your book there's always a segment in the middle of these called underrated or overrated and I toss something out at you you're free to pass
of course and you tell me if you think it's overrated or underrated so let's start with Stephen Curry he's underrated uh because uh first of all he's the best shooter in the history of a really important game and second of all he's a guy who got KD to come to the team by saying I think Durant said there'll be too many uh
there not enough shots for both of us and Curry said I don't care I'm a point point guard I want my team to I want my team to win I mean the low ego on that guy is breathtakingly important and right now in our Superstar culture we think you're supposed to do what you've always done which is put up the kind of
numbers he put up and he wanted his team to win and he was a contributor I think he's a special special guy Chevy Chase not the town the actor uh I mean let's go with both uh he's underrated uh you did say the comedian the comedian okay all of a sudden I thought you were goinging the question to his critics but oh no his physical
humor is still like every dad everywhere aspires to be able to make the faces he makes to get your kids to laugh uh so he's underrated as a comedian uh turns out most of the people who've worked with him say that he's maybe a complicated guy oh [Laughter] yeah King Lear I mean I think we have to say underrated
because nobody's reading it today so they don't know that they're missing a lot Willa Cather she's a Nebraskan so she's obviously underrated like every other Nebraskan right Raymond Chandler too I don't even need to ask Martin Luther as a political thinker well that's good uh I mean the truth is underrated but I
think just as a thinker he's so underrated I don't want people to start in this 500th anniversary of uh the DOR at vitberg I don't want people to read him through political lenses because that this guy's going through an existential crisis where he actually believes that there's a law and that he's a law breaker and he's scared to
death about eternity so he's not motivated by politics but in an instrumental sense figuring out how to navigate politics is underrated and why do you so admire Margaret Chase Smith I mean mean the speech that she gave uh on the senate floor when McCarthyism was just being tolerated it's a really special speech everybody
should go back and read it I was a courageous move for anybody to make but for a woman to make at that time in that place and she was a republican right from Maine and she was the woman who served longest in the US Senate I think that's right yeah yeah she's I think she's Susan Collins's hero what did chaer teach you about theology
when that Opera with it sh s the drought of March hath pierc it in the rot and bothered every Vine and switch theur of which vertu in gendr is the FL I didn't know you were going to do that well challenged I don't know if there's any I don't know if there's any theology in there but uh I think that um people long
to go on pilgrimage uh and sometimes it's for theological reasons and sometimes they're just kind of aroused we don't I mean this was a she was you know there was all sorts of motives we don't prepare any of these moments if you're wondering now in your book you say something really quite striking to me
this is a book on education and we all know you know the great Classic tretis on education of the 18th century is Russo as Emil and you say you spent 18 months living with this book studying it uh why that book and what did you learn from it um some guy on Twitter a couple days ago sent me an apology because he bought
my book planning to hate read it uh which is a term I've never heard of uh but he wanted to hate read my book and then he said he read The Vanishing American adult and he said it wasn't what he thought it was going to be which was he thought it was going to be some old man screaming get off my lawn which
is just not what the book's about it's a it's a constructive project that our kids are being raised no it's a deep theoretical book it's not a political book right yeah about education in the deepest sense it is 100% not about politics and it's 99% not about policy the little bit that's about policy is that we need to uncouple schooling and
education in our mind so we can pluralize the tools school's one kind of tool we need lots of kind of tools in our education um so it is it is not about um politics or policy but it it's about this distinction between adolescence which is a really special thing and I'll get back to a meal quickly and Perpetual adolescence which
I think is really dangerous and we're drifting into a place where almost all of our kids are being sort of shepher not shepherded through adolescence and therefore they're drifting into per perpetual adolesence and they're ending up stranded and Neverland in Peter Pan is a dystopian hell right I mean
Neverland is not a good place you don't want to get to the place where you're physically an adult and you have no moral sense you have no awareness of History you have no interest in the future and Peter Pan is killing people and he doesn't really care he doesn't remember their names he it's a really dystopian thing per IAL adolesence is
the bad thing adolescence is special we need to figure out how to use adolescence it's a means to an end um so that that's what the book's about and I am an augustinian uh in my sort of anthropology um but rouso is a romantic and I think he's wrong about lots and lots and lots of things but I think he's
really really smart and you have to engage him and you have to engage people who have ideas that are different than yours because you may ultimately be converted to their View and you need to encounter things that are big and challenging and kind of threatening to your worldview or you may
sometimes come to believe you're right and be able to respond to the counterarguments well your argument will be better you'll grow through it and you'll become more persuasive to others through it so I think I think Russo's fundamental anthropological understanding of why we feel that things are broken in our soul
is he's got a reason to blame society for everything we feel is wrong in the world and I think there's a lot of Brokenness deep inside all of us and so that's kind of the augustinian versus uh rovian sense of what's wrong but I think the Emil is is brilliant both because it forces me to wrestle with ideas uh that
I don't agree with or mostly don't agree with um but I think it's also just an incredibly good read so if you've if you've never read the Emil it's about 500 pages of rouso taking the first three of the five books are rouso taking a kid from birth through puberty um this just to show you how horrible a human
being rouso was he actually aband he's a widow widower he abandons his own kids at an orphanage so he'd have more time to write a book about how you should raise kids uh uh and then books four and five are essentially uh taking a boy man and girl woman uh through puberty and into courtship and marriage and so he
does it from each side of the the two genders thinking about what that courtship looks like and I first encountered Russo ail St John's I did a master's program at that kind of great books program at St John's Anapolis and I just fell in love with hating the book and I carried it around for month I I I know what it is experientially I just
didn't have a category for it so I hate I hate read Russo's a meal for 18 months 1997 as you know rouso is quite negative on travel as a way of acquiring useful knowledge he thinks it leads to a a sort of false vanity and a belief that you know things that actually you don't and you like myself you're quite positive on
travel uh make the case for travel as a fundamental form of learning yeah I a fish can't explain to you what water's like because he's never been out of water and I don't think you can really understand where you're from until you go somewhere else and see a different form of social organization and so what
this book is built the first third is sort of stra stage setting um about this new thing called Perpetual adolescence and the last 2/3 is five uh habits that I think we should want our kids to acquire as they come of age and one is learning how to have the eyes to see which come from travel and it's very akin to why you learn a foreign language
I mean you may be learning a foreign language because you're going to need to use it but even if you never use your Spanish or your French or your Latin um it was still really good to go through the process of having to learn a new language and think about its grammatical structure and other vocabulary from
yours because now for the first time you can see your own language it wasn't until I started to learn Spanish that I understood English at all and I think that's what travel is this is not the grand European tour for Rich Kids this is about going 10 miles from your own home and spending time with people in
another neighborhood or this is about going from the built environment where our kids are almost exclusively being raised and going and living in nature for a while and I think you acquire eyes to see where you're from the first time and this is this is something that I first came to see as a little kid um I
live in the same Farm dependent town in in Nebraska one of these 25,000 person towns uh that I grew up in and when I was a little kid we would go fishing in Minnesota and we didn't have any money my dad was a a high school teacher and a football and wrestling coach and we would go stay at this rustic cabin that
my uncle had in Minnesota and we'd go fishing and I thought I was in the middle of nowhere like I thought this was the greatest thing in the world to go fishing with my dad and my uncle and my cousins um and my dad and my uncle always sort of put the kabash on how Wild and and sort of remote and primitive we thought we were because
when they were kids they used to go up into the Northern woods of Canada fishing and it was just a bunch of high school and college boys from Nebraska who would load in a car and drive up into Canada and literally they had canoes sleeping bags uh they had fishing tackle they had fishing poles and they had a few cans of
beans and a can opener as their emergency plan for if they didn't catch enough food uh how they would live and they would just go and to remove Canada and they would talk without any analytical categories to explain it but they would talk about how they first understood social relationships and they first understood the little farm town
that they were from and I'm from um because they could contrast it with being at a place where there was nothing built and I don't think we're helping our kids right now understand the need to get to another place more often so that you have the fresh perspective on where they're from now in 1992 or so you
lived in Europe for about a year where were you mainly so I was in uh Prague uh for the summer of 1992 and then I did a junior year abroad at Oxford in the fall of 92 and then uh December January early February probably uh two-ish months I bought a EUR Rail Pass um back then you could buy I think it was 600 bucks for
60 days uh Limitless train ticket to anywhere in Europe and a buddy of mine and I went and did that for 60 days living on the trains in Europe in the middle of winter and we had no money like our $660 was all we had and we budgeted $6 I think it was $6 a day to live for those two months which basically meant you know we had a
backpack where you'd have peanut butter jelly and mustard and then you would buy baguettes whatever town you got to we'd buy water and we'd buy bread and we didn't have any money that we were going to be able to pay for lodging so we quickly realized that whenever you wanted to be in a town for two or more
days or some European city you'd pick a town that was a 12-hour train ride away as the way that you would be able to sleep and so you would batch towns you would be in a city if you want to be in City a for a few days in City B you go a b a b so that every night you can take a 10 to 12 hour overnight train as a way
to sleep indoors um and we did that for months it was great what was the biggest surprise for you in and near Prague living there well Prague is incredible because it wasn't bombed out and we were there um you know this is two and a half years after the the fall of the wall in Berlin and I'm from a part of Nebraska where
when I was a kid we're parts of Nebraska I live again about an hour outside Omaha and parts of our state are hispanicized rapidly we have a lot of first generation immigration but when I was a kid the town that I'm from was basically 100% German the big cultural divide in town is German Catholic versus German
Lutheran and uh I never really sounds pretty I never I never thought of myself as potentially looking because everybody where I lived sort of looked like I looked and when I was in Prague for the summer of 1992 um PR uh Czech and Slovak republics were going to split in November so it was four months later and
so they had some old currency that was sort of pre uh fall of Communism and then they had a transitional currency and then they had the current Czechoslovakian currency and then they were about to split the country into so if you were a tour tourist it was really easy to get taken because there was a whole bunch of bad money in circulation
that wasn't worth anything and um but you couldn't lose more than $6 a day right well yeah in the summer again this was I was in prog the beginning Summer and the winter was the train travel so maybe I didn't budget well so the beginning summer I might have lived kind of high on the hog and then at the end I
had no lodging for a couple of months but peanut butter and no jelly in Prague we ate really really well uh because that was the beginning of the trip and uh all of these Shuckers who were trying to you know take your money would think that I was a German tourist in Prague for the weekend because the Germans
would use Prague as their playground at this point and so people would come up to me constantly like just you know very serously showing you currency in their hand it was illegal uh to be a private money changer but all these people would just come up to me all the time and in German ask me if I wanted to change
money and I hadn't expected uh to to feel in a place like Prague that there were folks that had this constant immediate East West line having created Eastern Europe as kind of a playground for Western Europeans but I was mistaken as a German all the time now you're an opponent of what you call age segregation in education and I think
more generally in life tell us why I think if you brought people from 300 years ago or 3,000 years ago uh to live among us now if you Dro them out of a time machine I think the first thing that would stun them is just simply our material abundance and our tools and especially our digital tools right we
have we have more built stuff than anybody in human history by you know huge magnitudes and so I don't think you could possibly arrive here and not first be surprised by our material abundance but I think if those folks stayed with us for a while 30 days later that would wear off and I think the thing that
would be most striking to people from other times and places living among us is how age segregated we live it is a really really weird thing to allow our 17year olds to believe that the world is mostly made up of 17y olds right it's it's strange it's not healthy and it's not true and that's the way we raise our
kids they are hyper hyper age segregated and as the father of you know 15 and 13y old girls um I get that the pure slight of a 13 or a 15y old girl really hurts but it's not really enduring if you have any wisdom right if you if if your 13-year-old knows 60 year olds and 75 year olds and they've been through a lot
of life experience another 13 or 15y old girl saying something TR and mean to you like it just it's water off a duck's back if you have any perspective and I don't think we're serving our kids very well by allowing them to live these hyper AG segregated lives and I think that's closely connected to the core uh driver of I think our Perpetual
adolescence category which is that our kids don't know the distinction in their belly they don't feel the distinction between production and consumption they know uh sort of Aging through grades in school as their kind of productive work time and then the rest of life is just different forms of consumption that's
really unsatisfying and it's really unfair to them again this book is not a blame laying book but if I were laying blame in this book I I I would not I would not be blaming Millennials I'm I would be blaming we parents and grandparents that we're not helping think with our kids about the fact that
we're not celebrating scar tis with them and scar tissue is the foundation of Future character and they are able to persevere and they need to develop a work ethic and they just happen to live at the richest time and place in human history and so they live in a life they live a life that's almost entirely separated from productive work
environments and that's never been the case of anybody who's ever grown up before that they didn't grow up around work well one of the most basic things that makes you happy in life is thinking that you're needed my my work our work is needed not you know not does my back hurt at the end of the day or not do I
think I get paid enough money or not is there some annoying person three cubicles away who talks too loudly on his or her phone but when I leave home on Monday morning or whatever day you begin your your work day or work week do I think anybody needs me if you think that if your work matters to somebody if
you have a meaningful way to contribute to your neighbor you're basically going to be happy and if you don't have that you're almost certainly not going to be happy and right now we're raising our teens segregated from work and therefore segregated from any clear sense that they're needed now or going to be needed
in the future and that ends up feeling a lot like cotton candy it's pretty Peter panike and pretty miserable I'm actually a fan of the older 19th century British lancastrian system where when possible you have the somewhat older children teach the younger children and the Elder children also learn through teaching not
just by being students and mix roles that way it gives you a natural way to mix ages where there's some rationale for it I worry also with people aging and going more into nursing homes we will become a more age segregated Society so there's a lot of worry about racial segregation gender segregation but age segregation is hardly mentioned
but if you think about it how old you are is a pretty fundamental fact about your life and I'm very glad to see your book is drawing attention to this issue I hope that gains some traction thanks and it isn't just the older I think you're I want to underscore your point Tyler it isn't just 13y olds being
around 60 and 75 year olds though it should be that because the the pattern of life is you start needing diapers and you end up needing diapers right I mean we we ultimately become dependent again and that means there are a whole bunch of people that need us that they need our help and our kids shouldn't live the
narcissistic 13-year-old consumer experience of thinking there's this sort of Fountain of Youth and if only they could consume more they'll be happy all the data shows that that doesn't actually make you happy and so there are old people who need us um but there are also younger people who need us and it
is a really good way to sort of get outside your own education to think about how you pass along education I do think there's a benefit to our our family structure you know providentially just happens to be 15-year-old girl 13year old girl big gap providential surprise son and uh it it is a gift for my daughters that they have to help
teach my son because it pulls them out of the narcissistic experience of being 13 or 15 needs them they matter and they learn about their own learning by doing that one last Point uh when I was a college President we used to host these sort of dinners for donors at our house we would do these kind of rolling salons
of eight and 10 and 12 people all the time and one of the questions that my wife and I started to ask people and it was fun if you were talking to a 45y old or an 85y old how do you recognize whether or not a kid or a grandkid is mature and one time we were hosting this party and this woman said oh that's easy
for a boy I know for sure if a boy is old enough that I would trust him to be alone with my baby for 90 minutes such that you might have to change a diaper during the time he's there he's a man and if he's not he's still a child there's all these 30-year-old guys around the table start squirming like guess I guess my man cave really is a
place that I escaped to be a little kid again but it was amazing immediately every mom around the table said oh yeah that's it you know if there if there's a if there's a 11 or a 13 or a 15 or a 17 or a 19y old boy and you'd think he could take care of a one-year-old for 90 minutes and not have the Kid die he's
mature if not he's immature before we get to the questions of others two final questions from me when you're hiring staffers or hiring in other capacities such as the university uh obviously we look for people who are smart people with good values people who work hard but what is it you look for in
particular that maybe other employers or other Senators other people don't think carefully enough about I think the only two talents I have uh from a work standpoint are I'm pretty good at sussing out when a strategic Vision vision is missing and building a menu of choices about what strategic choices we should be making
what what do we need to decide for this Corporation this small business this not for-profit this college uh and the second is I think I'm decent at team building and the reason for that is I only hire people who are big cause low ego and that pairing is hard to find yeah great to be smart and of course
there's a minimum threshold of how smart people need to be but fundamentally what I want is people who want to be a part of a cause that's bigger than themselves and they want to do something that matters they they're sort of always asking that deathbed like question when I'm you know if I get the cancer diagnosis at 50 or in my old age at 85
when I look back on my life well I think I spent my 30th year well well it depends on whether or not I was pulling on ores for some cause that's bigger than me and doing it in a way that I didn't care who got the credit and I want people on a team who in that kind of Arista tilian sense distinguish
between deliberation decision and action such that you have a team of people who want to fight really hard when you're deliberating among strategic choices you want people who really are not bashful about trying to lay out pros and cons of both their position and everybody else's position in the room and fight really
really hard but then finally when you pull the trigger and make a decision I want people on a team who don't remember what side they fought for because this was the decision we made and once we made this decision we're going this way and nobody's going to get credit because it was originally their idea or get
blamed because it wasn't their idea we want it to succeed because we're on a team and that that sort of big cause low ego impulse those are the people that are fun to work with too and what's the most final question the most underrated part of American government uh just the American idea I mean fundamentally uh we are blessed to
live in an extraordinary Nation where in 1787 there was sort of a near miraculous stew of ideas that came together to clarify in the drafting of the Constitution um this belief in Universal human dignity we actually believe that 320 million Americans well we actually believe 7.2 billion people on the globe
but our primary responsibility as a government is to these 320 million people we believe that people are created with dignity and their rights don't come to them from government it isn't the benevolence of government that grants you the right to free speech assembly religion press protest or redress of grievances we believe that
these rights are inalienable that's an unbelievable idea and then from that we build a government that exists to secure those rights but government's just a tool the the animating principle is this idea of universal human dignity and it's it's it's intoxicating and we don't celebrate it enough before we get to
questions a big round of applause for Ben sass now these are the rules for questions just to be clear they are my rules they are not the Senator's rules but first no speeches I will cut you off second no partisan questions or statements and third no questions on pending legislation if you ask we will simply
pass over you again those are my restrictions not the Senators I'm so glad I came I didn't know we got those rules but can we get those rul St let's stay let's stay for a while and I'll also take a few questions from the iPad I will alternate the two mics uh feel free to introduce yourself if you wish first person here my
question is you talk a lot about the removal from Millennials from the means of production um Joseph shumer thought that there was going to be the uh cause of socialism that young people just saw the the benefits of capitalism they didn't see the actual production of it um do you think that vision is kind of
coming to pass that socialism is more popular with Millennials than it's been in Generations yeah thanks important question um the Sanders moment obviously led a lot of people to start doing some new analysis about this and it's kind of amazing and don't quote me on this precise stat because I'm I'm sort of
doing it from memory here and it's not something I've cited in public before but I think um I I have a reference to something related to it in the book I think it's something like 42% of Millennials think that socialism is the most just economic system and yet only 14% of Millennials can identify what socialism is as an economic structure so
roughly three times as many think they're pro- socialism as have any real idea what it means because lots of what it means some of it of course sounds great about egalitarian economics and there's lots of that that we could debate and find ourselves on a Continuum not sort of a a truly binary choice on
some aspects of who owns what tools uh in a civilization but some of it just not understand in that that means prohibiting a lot of private transactions that the two individuals involved in the transaction would like to make uh seemingly not necessarily with huge externalities I'm not sure how closely connected that is to the
experience of growing up divorced from labor but I do think we need to recognize how unique it is to live at a time where uh the vast majority of our teens are growing up without having any meaningful work experience and that has never happened before in human history hunter gatherers and Farmers again I
mean historic farming from 10,000 years ago until industrialization not the modern sort of high-tech um egg economics of today but historic um agriculture was like being a hunter gatherer in that you just inherited the calling of mom and dad and grandma and grandpa right it wasn't you didn't make a choice there was no job Choice job
choice I mean some people were called to the clergy and you know law emerged as a kind of formal profession about 200 years ago and there were a few traveling salesmen and some witch doctors as sort of early medicine but by and large it isn't until industrialization 150ish years ago that you have job Choice
that's new but it was a onetime thing you left the farm you moved to the city or you graduated high school and you went to the factory you picked a job one time and you had it until death of retirement what's happening now is we're going to have job change again and again and again and again for your whole life
and duration at a firm there's lots of things in Tyler's book that at a data level um he probably wants to teach me some lessons about the complacency and passivity of certain kinds of job change today but at the macro level what's happening is we have people who are teens who have to make a job choice and
they kind of know intuitively that it's not the one job Choice forever it's just the first one and we don't know how to think about a multi career life we don't have institutions and intellectual categories for thinking about that and so so it creates lots of very understandable anxiety and our policy discussions are decades behind and
thinking about what needs to come next and so I think some of this move towards socialism might just be a security seeking that's sort of an understandable response to the uncertainty of what it's going to mean to be disrupted at 40 and 45 and 50 next question Senator you've been at both sides of the bridge and our
logo bridging academic ideas with policy makers um what do we do well in building that bridge and what do we do poorly where can we improve well um I do so I taught at the Lynden Johnson School uh public policy school at the University of Texas for a handful of years um and I think one of the things that policy schools business
schools law schools are trying to do well um but aren't as good at it as say Med schools are is integrate the fact that there's both theoretical and classroom learning and there's experiential learning and we haven't figured out in most professional schools how to create apprenticeship models where you cycle through different
aspects of what doing this kind of work will actually look like and so there are ways that there are tighter feedback loops at a med school than there are going to be at a policy school so there are things that I don't think we've thought nearly enough about ways that Professional School models should
diverge from traditional um theoretical academic disciplines or Humanities for example um but I really can't blame the policy schools for that fundamentally because I think the bigger problem is that we don't know how to have um a big agenda setting conversation about what policies we should be fighting over I
think um again I we're I'm happy that we're not talking about the president at all tonight like that's not one of the purposes of our discussion but one of the things that I find strange from a whole bunch of folks on the left who are really critical of me is they say you're worried about declining norms and you're
worried about X Y and Z and you've been critical of the president about this that or the other thing or you're concerned about declining public trust but look at your voting record you end up voting with Trump you know 95% of the time or whatever they say what's weird about that critique is it sort of just assumes that we're voting on important
things and that's not true right I mean we're we're not having legislative discussions about big things obviously there are some on the horizon and I'm not trying to lead us down a path of going there but by and large in the last four or five months we're having policy discussions that have a sort of right to
left Continuum but they're about really really small things we're not having any conversation about what it looks like to have a national security strategy for the age of cyber and Jihad again we're 28 years past the end of the Cold War and we still think about National Security primarily as nation state
actors and primarily by traditional War making means when lots of the targets of cyber attacks in the future are going to be civil society not governmental and a lot of the attacking entities are going to be non-state actors not just State actors we're not having any honest discussions about the entitlement crisis
right we're not having any discussions about what it looks like to think about a world where 40 and 45 and 50 year olds are disrupted from their jobs and so we're not talking about big policy we're not talking about anything that's five and 10 years future oriented so how can we blame academics for not knowing how
to help us fit with facilitate those kinds of conversations because it would be stupid for academic programs in a university setting in professional schools to try to remake themselves to come deal with the legislative small ball issue of next Tuesday and that's really all we're dealing with most of the time right now a question from the
iPad why is there so little in your book about sex and I would add as moderator books four and five of rouso andal they're drenched in sex in an 18th century kind of way but might sex was really similar most centuries we don't know do we might one argue that the more one thinks and writes about sex the more you're led
to rouso and conclusions that a certain kind of constraint will prove impossible and then one is pulled away further from Ben sasai conclusions uh but anyway Pi up on any it's a really fair question so um I wanted to stay away from sex 100% And then ultimately I couldn't do it there's three pages in your book of edx
and Page 33 mentions it once uh right now you're kind of creeping me out um I the intergenerational chapter so again the five constructive chapters are about self-consciously developing a work ethic they're about limited consumption uh it's sort of a soft uh apology for stoicism uh they're about
intergenerational ISM they're about learning to travel and they're about becoming actually literate not just functionally literate um but repetitively liberate literate habitually literate I think I think it was Twain I can't remember for certain but I think it was Twain who said the man who chooses not to read has no
advantage over the man who cannot read and right now we live in a society of people who are decreasingly repetitively literate the average American reads 19 minutes a day um and it's age correlated older folks are reading quite a bit more than 19 minutes and younger folks much less than 19 minutes and I think Gutenberg is the
true father of America I think the sinanan of America is mass literacy which led to competitive ideas healthy challenges to Authority a plural Marketplace after the printing press um that then creates a First Amendment culture of free speech press assembly Etc so those are the five chapters the
intergenerational chapter for a while uh I framed as discover the body and I really what I mean by that is that kind of dependency of Youth and then ultimately the dependency again of your declining years and an awareness and honesty about mortality so much of unhealthy utopian status projects in the world are driven by a denial of
mortality like we are mortal you are going to die you have limited options with your life and you want to think a lot about Redeeming the time healthy people think about how can I get more of the crap out of my life that I'm never going to look back and say oh I'm glad I wasted time trying to consume that
frivolous fad for a time uh no commentary on fidget Spinners here but um overrated overrated um but if you if you think of the distinction between childhood and adulthood as dependency and then ultimately becoming independent why adolescence is a glorious gift again it's a concept that's only about two
Millennia old is that we came to believe that you could hit puberty you could become biologically an adult and you don't have to be fully independent immediately you don't have to be emotionally morally financially in terms of household structure or School leaving you don't have to be an adult and independent all on your own immediately
it's a pretty glorious thing to get this kind of 18month to four-year uh Greenhouse phase as you transition from dependent childhood to Independent adulthood but it's impossible to not understand and rouso obviously clearly understands that a whole bunch of the anxiety of this moment and the fact that
your body goes from being a kid to being somebody who's able to reproduce you got to have not just the Apron Strings moment of your six-year-old where you know you kind of realize you can be away from Mom for six or 10 or you know 12 hours a day and not die but you actually have an emotional cutting of the strings
with your parents that you can go from your family of origin to a family of your creation and choice and procreation right that adolescent transition stage is highly wrapped up in sexuality right and I don't think you can think meaningfully about Generations without thinking a little bit about procreation and so even though I 100% wanted to
avoid sex because I just I I think we don't have enough commonality and I didn't want to be drawn into culture wars anywhere in this book Ken Burns has the great phrase that right now we have a whole lot of uh pabus and very very little Unum and if you think of what Ken Burn's work is about jazz and baseball
and Civil War and Lewis and Clark and the Dust Bowl and his new project about to come out on Vietnam one of the things that he's trying to do is give us a common can he's trying to give us some shared experiences so the things we can agree on before we get to policy fights because policy and legislative fights
they just aren't big enough to form your tribe around it's really really lame to think that these parties are that interesting and so I want more things that we can unite around as a people before we get to meaningful and often important policy fights but if you're going to think about those things we can
unite around I don't want to get sucked right back into 1960s Echoes of the culture war and yet I didn't feel like I could do Justice to a chapter on the body and on Generations without saying that sex has purposes and there aren't two and there aren't 92 they're basically three purposes to sex right sex is a a covenant initiation and
renewal ceremony sex gives you a different kind of knowledge of someone you form a kind of bond uh with someone that's different than just a random person on the street sex matters right sex is for procreation and sex is for pleasure and there really isn't much more to it than that and yet those three things
should be differentiated because it's not just another contact sport and I don't think it's helpful to have teenagers not know that sex matters and yet you can kind of understand it like you know when you're old and you look back on your sexuality I bet most people are going to think it was basically reducible to
those three kinds of categories so I felt like I had to talk about it a little bit but I wanted to duck the culture wars as much as possible next question Senator I loved your articulation of the big cause low ego hiring criteria uh because I'm great friends with Charles Drummond and going to his wedding this week good stuff um
but my simple question was where do you Source most of the material for your humorous and witty tweets so uh at Ben SAS is just me uh it's my personal account it's not a a governance thing I have a press office um that's at SAS uh but at SAS is just me and I'm a commuting dad and so my material is really the fact that I've
usually got a six or a 13 or a 15-year-old traveling with me and we're on the road and it feels like just our version of digital era Huck fin so uh I I'm I think I'm the only commuting dad in the Senate um I we live in Nebraska and I come here every week Monday to Friday and most weeks I bring one of my
three kids with me I get I get home on Friday afternoon and my wife tells me which kid annoyed her most last week and they become my date for the next week uh and most of the Twitter material is just that and again there's a tiny little bit of Unum I mean you know I don't have that many Twitter followers but whatever
160,000 or something like that and I I mean that's small for people who are you know doing something big and I'm not yet so I just I'm learning uh how to how to try to have a public conversation about stuff that I think matters um but basically my audience on Twitter is just like 20 buddies of mine right it's it's
like it's my college roommates and it's my dad and uh I'm just telling stories about how ridiculous it is that my six-year-old just lost a shoe in the capital and we we're down a shoe today and it's going to it's going to be rough to get through the whole day uh with that half an inch difference between the
bottom of your foot and the other shoe when you're only this tall it's going to cause some disruption and I'm also we live out in the country and we have a lot of animals some are ours and some are just around our property and there's that great Farm debate about if you put out food and you know that some animals
are recurring they're coming back and now you're kind of feeding them do you allow your kids to name the animals uh because that's the threshold where it becomes a pet and I don't want to admit that I own all these things um but we have these animals in our life and they really do bring you carcass all the time
and it happens it's happened for years and years of my life but I'm still surprised every day when I go outside there's a new dead animal on the stoop and there's some dog or cat that brought it as a gift to me like that's 30% of my Twitter and how many names are there we have three dogs three dogs that's it there's three names they have names my
children sometimes speak at other animals that are around I refuse to repeat any of those names next question this school at uh Char school at Mason uh this has been an unusual experience and it brings to me the question of reform in our political system uh rationality Thinking Out of the Box thinking away from ideology
given the financial cost of running for office do you have suggestions or do you see trends that might allow us to move toward a more rational political system yeah this is the last you have about three minutes so please as you wish anything else you want to add is fine too four minutes then then let's figure
out a way to save the fourth minute to say something that goes back to this shared experience of parenting because it's a really important question but I don't really want to finish on politics so I will try not to use up all the time and then I'll let Tyler give us some way to close but um I can only speak about
it from my experience because I'm new to this and so I have not taken sort of an academic analytic look at the change in um candidate uh selection over decades I I don't really know I would I would want to consult with real with academics who've actually studied it with data but pardon me um I do think that one of the things we
misunderstand about our politics maybe I have two things that I think we misunderstand about our politics one I think most of our political problems are Downstream from culture and I think we keep acting like we'll be able to fix our politics with politics and I don't really think we can because I think our
politics are a mess because we don't understand where we are in economic history and where we are in economic history this transition from industrialization to whatever the digital economy looks like and therefore shorter and shorter average duration of jobs and therefore a transition from Villages and urban ethnic neighborhoods
where there was known dense social networks to this new thing which I think is we we'll have we'll produce new forms of Social Capital but it might take half a century or a century and it's going to be really painful and disruptive as we go through this time I think there's a fundamental crisis of loneliness in our
time that we don't know how to think about the average American had 3.2 friends in 1990 I mean Arista Alan friends people that when you're happy they feel happy and when you're sad they hurt not because they choose it but just because they love you right the way we parent when my daughters or my son when
they hurt I don't make a choice to hurt I just hurt I love them and the average American had over three friends 25 years ago has about 1.8 friends today a having in 25 years 40% of Americans have no Confidant I think there's there we we just we can't make sense of how bad that ache hurts and how much people are
projecting onto politics a hope that we could solve deep crises of the soul and of local community as neighborhoods and mediating institutions are hollowed out and I don't think politics can fix any of that stuff so so one thing we misund understand is that our political problems are Downstream from a cultural
and an economic moment a second thing though that I think we misunderstand is I don't think we've fully grappled and I mean to say this delicately or humbly it sounds kind of harsh especially as we're almost wopping up but I think we have a massive human capital problem in our politics in that um i'
I've worked in nine or t sectors because I've done a lot of Crisis and turnaround stuff and I think we don't have the right kind of people serving right now the vast majority of people in politics are kind and well-meaning but you wouldn't pick them to lead lots of Institutions um through times of Crisis right now there's not a lot of
leadership in our politics that's not a commentary on any specific individual but I think the biggest long-term thought most national politicians have right now is their own re-election moment and that's not long enough we need 10 and 20 and 30y year Visions for the kind of disruption that we're going
through so I let me toss in a new Final question then you can tie it all up okay let's say I'm 20 years old not married not a parent but I expect someday I'll be a parent what kind of life experience should I invest in now so I will become a good parent you can finish what you were saying and then close on that
takeway advice to young people who someday want to be parents yeah um how about we talk afterwards and I'll give you the rest of my thought that is more directly connected to our our primary selection process right now because I don't think I'll be able to get from that more technical answer to this
synthetic helpful place to close um I uh I think Tyler just gave me the hook is what really happened uh he did it delicately but I think he said keep you much longer shut him off turn off the mics we're out of here um I think that you can't possibly become a really good parent without developing empathy I don't know that you have to
have clear cognitive categories to do it there are lots and lots of people who are good parents who are empathetic who maybe couldn't reflect on it but since you're asking the question for people who are advice seeking I think you need to self-consciously think about the cultivation of empathy and the travel
point that you asked is another way of thinking about that is why it's important to become well read Because when you go into books and you go to different kinds of stories and obviously you know you've just written a really important non-fiction book and this is a non-fiction book but one of the reasons
why it's critically important for our teens to read fiction is they need to be transported to other times and places they need to actually be able to see through the lenses of other protagonists and I think one of the the fundamental challenges of the moment we're at is that I think we believe that the digital
moment will necessarily expose us to more and more diverse things and I think what's actually going to happen is that we're going to become more and more siloed and I think there's a real danger of tribalism in being able to at the moment that media is going to disintermediate we're not going to have big common channels anymore we're going
to have more and more Niche channels it will be possible to surround yourself only with people who already believe what you believe and in that world you can create Echo Chambers and when advertisers and marketers and Russians are going to try to surround you with Echo Chambers to only believe what you already believe um it's not going to be
easy to develop empathy it's going to be really easy to demonize the other and come to believe that the Deep problems of my soul and the Deep problems of my mortality could maybe just be solved if I could Vanquish those other really bad people from the field that's not true and you're going to we're going to have
to as a people develop the maturity and the habits of empathy creation and that requires going other times and places both physically and in a literary sense let's have another big round of applause announcements first do subscribe to our podcast series we also have Kareem Abdul Jabar Camille Paglia Peter teal uh many
other interesting people also there is book signing outside this book Ben sass The Vanishing American adult a truly wonderful book uh there's plenty of books that you know people might think are politics books but I describe this book on Twitter as a manual and how not to be complacent than [Applause]